GitHub user unclespode opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/60
Update jquery.couch.js
In the original code, if there was an error doing the long poll, it would
wait 100ms and then try again. If it errors again, it doubles to 200ms. If it
errors again, it
Congrats Dirkjan thats awesome.
On 17 May 2013, at 1:39 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has
elected Dirkjan Ochtman as a CouchDB committer.
Apache ID: djc
IRC nick: djc
welcome :)
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Garren Smith gar...@apache.org wrote:
Congrats Dirkjan thats awesome.
On 17 May 2013, at 1:39 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has
elected Dirkjan
Welcome :)
On 17 May 2013 12:42, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
welcome :)
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Garren Smith gar...@apache.org wrote:
Congrats Dirkjan thats awesome.
On 17 May 2013, at 1:39 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I am pleased to
Friendly bump.
NEWS and CHANGES are still empty.
I'll be calling the vote on 1.3.1 in 12 days, so y'all better get your
changes in pronto! ;)
On 15 May 2013 07:24, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote:
On 15 May 2013 06:17, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 15, 2013
Hi devs,
See this:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/60
Failed — The Travis CI build failed (Details)
It's it's current state, Travis CI is meaningless. It fails 50% of the time
or more.
I'm fed up of the bogus emails it sends me, and I think it's sending the
wrong message to people
I'm in favour of turning it off unless its really easy to fix.
On 17 May 2013, at 3:26 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Hi devs,
See this:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/60
Failed — The Travis CI build failed (Details)
It's it's current state, Travis CI is
This sounds like a great initiative. Anyone interested in coordinating this?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
Date: 17 May 2013 14:11
Subject: Grace Hopper Open Source Day
To: memb...@apache.org memb...@apache.org
Cc: Apache Board bo...@apache.org
I
Welcome :)
On 05/17/2013 04:39 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has
elected Dirkjan Ochtman as a CouchDB committer.
Apache ID: djc
IRC nick: djc
Twitter: @djco
By default, external contributions to
congratulations Dirkjan!
On 17 May 2013 13:39, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has
elected Dirkjan Ochtman as a CouchDB committer.
Apache ID: djc
IRC nick: djc
Twitter: @djco
By
Congrats Dirkjan.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.comwrote:
congratulations Dirkjan!
On 17 May 2013 13:39, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee
has
elected
Let's try to fix it. I've made a start.
On 17 May 2013 14:28, Garren Smith gar...@apache.org wrote:
I'm in favour of turning it off unless its really easy to fix.
On 17 May 2013, at 3:26 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Hi devs,
See this:
So that's a lot better now, except for R16 which we knew..
On 17 May 2013 17:25, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Let's try to fix it. I've made a start.
On 17 May 2013 14:28, Garren Smith gar...@apache.org wrote:
I'm in favour of turning it off unless its really easy to fix.
On 17
So Bob suggested that I raise this topic over here… Attaching the relevant
thread from user@ here.
I suppose this is a feature request to be able to optionally enable the passing
of the document stub as the oldDoc, if exists to the VDU, if the design doc
contains a flag to enable this
I'd prefer to have quality docs in the source code / .rst files if
possible. Wikis are ok for evolving stuff but if it's actually usage of
CouchDB proper, in the source is the way to go. You get history directly
tied to source code / release versions for free too.
I love having the manual
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13660945#comment-13660945
]
Dave Cottlehuber commented on COUCHDB-1784:
---
Looks like I'm still missing
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Jim Klo jim@sri.com wrote:
So Bob suggested that I raise this topic over here… Attaching the relevant
thread from user@ here.
I suppose this is a feature request to be able to optionally enable the
passing of the document stub as the oldDoc, if exists to
oldDoc is null in this case. That matches the case that the doc is
brand new and is surely deliberate? I asked him to post it this here
because I do understand the benefits of it being otherwise and wanted
to see this conversation.
My position is that deleting a document should free that id for
Where are we with merge procedure? What's the workflow we want to see
for master - 1.3.1?
1.3.1 is cut from 1.3.x I assume. But you asked a lot of questions
about how to make it easier to see the differences.
The best I could come up with to satisfy your question would have been
to insist that
yay! congratz!
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has
elected Dirkjan Ochtman as a CouchDB committer.
Apache ID: djc
IRC nick: djc
Twitter: @djco
By
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
oldDoc is null in this case. That matches the case that the doc is
brand new and is surely deliberate? I asked him to post it this here
because I do understand the benefits of it being otherwise and wanted
to see this
Not sure, Randal. Dave was asking similar things on IRC today.
We need to drive that to conclusion. (Unfortunately, I'm not your man for
that. Git is not my wheelhouse.)
On 17 May 2013 19:59, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Where are we with merge procedure? What's the workflow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13660999#comment-13660999
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on COUCHDB-1784:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1493:
--
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
null byte in string data dropped
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1368:
--
Priority: Blocker (was: Minor)
multipart/related document body doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1639:
--
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
doc_to_multi_part_stream does not include
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1639:
--
Priority: Minor (was: Blocker)
doc_to_multi_part_stream does not include
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1639:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.3.1
doc_to_multi_part_stream does not include headers for
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Not sure, Randal. Dave was asking similar things on IRC today.
We need to drive that to conclusion. (Unfortunately, I'm not your man for
that. Git is not my wheelhouse.)
On 17 May 2013 19:59, Randall Leeds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13661038#comment-13661038
]
Dave Cottlehuber commented on COUCHDB-1368:
---
+1 for 1.3.1; arguably the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1368:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.3.1
multipart/related document body doesn't identify which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13661086#comment-13661086
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on COUCHDB-1783:
--
32 matches
Mail list logo
