Is anyone of you aware of a paper or blog describing the internals of the
couchdb storage?
I remember there was a eerie of blog post but can't remember the address.
Anyway if anyone have some informations about it I'm interested.
- benoit
A bit old, but may be useful:
http://web.archive.org/web/20110903011752/http://horicky.blogspot.com/2008/10/couchdb-implementation.html
http://ayende.com/blog/3608/more-couchdb-reading-btree-lookup
http://ayende.com/blog/3609/more-couchdb-reading-btree-query-modify
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Sun, Oct 20,
Also there was good discussion about quite recently:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@couchdb.apache.org/msg18257.html
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
A bit old, but may be useful:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
Also there was good discussion about quite recently:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@couchdb.apache.org/msg18257.html
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com
wrote:
A bit
Author: djc
Date: Sun Oct 20 09:50:51 2013
New Revision: 3298
Log:
Add 1.5.0-rc.3 dir
Added:
dev/couchdb/source/1.5.0/rc.3/
On 20 October 2013 11:33, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also there was good discussion about quite recently:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@couchdb.apache.org/msg18257.html
--
,,,^..^,,,
On
Author: djc
Date: Sun Oct 20 09:52:27 2013
New Revision: 3299
Log:
Add 1.5.0-rc.3 files
Added:
dev/couchdb/source/1.5.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.5.0.tar.gz (with props)
dev/couchdb/source/1.5.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.5.0.tar.gz.asc (with props)
Dear community,
I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.5.0-rc.3, with a number of
documentation-related fixes.
Changes since last round:
*
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.5.x
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Andy Wenk a...@nms.de wrote:
On 20 October 2013 11:33, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
My goal for now is to document all the algorithmm used in a pseudo lang
like I did for the replicator. Then maybe write a simple implementation
so
people
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
But I just created the couchdb_internals repo to handle changes on this
content. Feel free to join me ;)
Why not just do it in the docs? Seems a little more accessible,
centralized and integrated.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Hi all,
It came to my mind that a some people are asking how the couchdb internals
are working. Some for implementing alternatives, some to start start to
hack on couchdb and others for pure curiosity.
I have started a repository to collect the docs about it:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nlwrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com
wrote:
But I just created the couchdb_internals repo to handle changes on this
content. Feel free to join me ;)
Why not just do it in the docs?
I think this could/should live in the manual (i.e. the docs we ship with
CouchDB). Just put it at the back, or in a developers section.
On 20 October 2013 12:34, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl
wrote:
On Sun,
Benoit,
Any way to get commit messages or notifications sent to the mailing list?
As a community, we've promised to have all major activity happen on the
mailing list. Usually, this would apply to code. But I think you could say
the same about the development documentation. If there is
Sig: OK
Hashes: OK
Diff: OK
Virus check: OK
Manual inspection: OK
Build: OK
Tests: OK
Futon: OK
+1
Thanks for preparing this, Dirkjan!
On 20 October 2013 11:54, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.5.0-rc.3, with a number of
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Benoit,
Any way to get commit messages or notifications sent to the mailing list?
was about to set it up.
As a community, we've promised to have all major activity happen on the
mailing list. Usually, this would apply
I think if we're documenting CouchDB internals, and other dev topics
relating to CouchDB, then it's fine for that stuff to live inside the
CouchDB manual. We host it online, so people can access it without having
to download CouchDB itself.
Also, you can edit ReST directly from Github. So
+1
sig: ok
md5/sha: ok
distcheck: ok
verify: ok
Tested on Ubuntu 13.10. Futon, Fauxton and documentation all present
and working.
On 20 October 2013 10:54, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.5.0-rc.3, with a number of
thanks Benoit - super cool!
I think this should be in the documentation. Why not opening an extra topic
called CouchDB internals in http://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/ . One
could also think about placing it in
http://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/intro/overview.html but imho it should be
more
On 20 October 2013 11:54, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.5.0-rc.3, with a number of
documentation-related fixes.
Changes since last round:
*
On 20 October 2013 13:32, Andy Wenk a...@nms.de wrote:
(1)
while running make distcheck, there are a lot of Tex warnings
(like Underfull \hbox) - not sure if this is an issue ...
Are you building from the dist tarball? The TeX stuff should not be
running, as the PDFs are supplied pre-built.
On 20 October 2013 14:19, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 20 October 2013 13:32, Andy Wenk a...@nms.de wrote:
(1)
while running make distcheck, there are a lot of Tex warnings
(like Underfull \hbox) - not sure if this is an issue ...
Are you building from the dist tarball?
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
Is anyone of you aware of a paper or blog describing the internals of the
couchdb storage?
I remember there was a eerie of blog post but can't remember the address.
Anyway if anyone have some informations about it I'm interested.
-
Could you past the full output somewhere, and give details of your system,
and the version of autoconf, automake, and make?
On 20 October 2013 14:32, Andy Wenk a...@nms.de wrote:
On 20 October 2013 14:19, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 20 October 2013 13:32, Andy Wenk a...@nms.de
+1 to have this information in docs. One good docs to describe all the couch! (:
P.S. I'll submit new replication protocol definition for review a bit
later today.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Garren Smith gar...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Benoit,
This is a great idea. I also
+1
Ubuntu 13.04
Erlang R15B01
gpg: OK
md5sum: OK
sha1sum: OK
diff: OK
./configure: OK
make distcheck: OK
make install: OK
verify installation: OK
2013/10/20 Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org
Could you past the full output somewhere, and give details of your system,
and the version of autoconf,
+1 Gentoo Linux ; Erlang R16B01 ; Spidermonkey 1.8.5
P.S. One missed bit: license information still broken (Noah, have
you fixed it? Because I didn't). Have we decide that this is non
critical? Just to be sure that everything is fine.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Dirkjan
+1 Windows 8, Erlang 14B04.
I'll try building an Erlang 16 Windows release next...
After Windows installation, the View Readme tickbox doesn't work properly:
it throws up a command prompt, wich then disappears, but no README file.
Not a showstopper though.
On 20 October 2013 16:15, Alexander
There are some issues with the LICENSE and NOTICE fine, but we are
compliant from a legal perspective now, so this is till a non-blocking bug
IMO. I have it on my TODO list to fix before the next release.
On 20 October 2013 17:15, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 Gentoo Linux ;
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S. One missed bit: license information still broken (Noah, have
you fixed it? Because I didn't). Have we decide that this is non
critical? Just to be sure that everything is fine.
IIUC, Noah needed more time to fix up
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
There are some issues with the LICENSE and NOTICE fine, but we are
compliant from a legal perspective now, so this is till a non-blocking bug
IMO. I have it on my TODO list to fix before the next release.
Do we have an
+1 for Windows 8, Erlang R16B02.
Nick
On 20 October 2013 16:34, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
There are some issues with the LICENSE and NOTICE fine, but we are
compliant from a legal perspective now, so
Hi All
I would like to participate in the Release Test vote, is it possible to request
a key in order to verify the release signature?
Jacob.
On 19 Oct 2013, at 22:55, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
That would be fantastic!
On 19 October 2013 23:53, Jacob Clark
Noah, here is the output of my make distcheck
https://gist.github.com/andywenk/7073586
On 20 October 2013 18:29, Nick North nort...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for Windows 8, Erlang R16B02.
Nick
On 20 October 2013 16:34, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 5:31
On 20 October 2013 20:13, Jacob Clark iamjacobcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
I would like to participate in the Release Test vote, is it possible to
request a key in order to verify the release signature?
Jacob.
On 19 Oct 2013, at 22:55, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Jacob, find
Yet another Windows build, with another Erlang version:
+1 Windows 8, Erlang R15B03-1
On 20 October 2013 19:45, Andy Wenk a...@nms.de wrote:
Noah, here is the output of my make distcheck
https://gist.github.com/andywenk/7073586
On 20 October 2013 18:29, Nick North nort...@gmail.com
There's actually a vote thread going on right now. The testing page should
have the instructions you need to run through the tests (including info on
how to request keys). Give it a go, and if you get stuck, shout!
On 20 October 2013 20:13, Jacob Clark iamjacobcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
I
37 matches
Mail list logo
