Re: make

2016-03-30 Thread Eli Stevens (Gmail)
Personally, I think that the project would benefit from having the OS packagers get pulled in towards the project more (ideally, producing .rpm and .deb etc. as part of the release process). To that end (and as previously mentioned), we've contracted with Dave Cottlehuber to produce Ubuntu

Re: make

2016-03-30 Thread Andy Wenk
Just a question from aside. Are there plans to integrate multi language docs? I know that we always wanted to work on that but we never found a solution to do it right. I am also +1 on your way to do it Jan … Cheers Andy -- Andy Wenk Hamburg - Germany RockIt! GPG public key:

Re: make

2016-03-30 Thread Joan Touzet
Agreed, good enough for now. - Original Message - > From: "Jan Lehnardt" > To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org Developers" > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 3:57:01 PM > Subject: make > > Hey all, > > last year I endeavoured to make the 2.0 build

make

2016-03-30 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hey all, last year I endeavoured to make the 2.0 build system to behave as close to 1.x as possible. We’re 80% there, but the remaining 80% prove hard, of course. Without going too much into the details, the missing parts are the integration with all the different operating systems. Stuff

Re: Replication with <2.0, third party servers, and Automerging conflicts

2016-03-30 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Heya Michael, thanks for taking the time to write this up! Could the same* be achieved by taking _revs out of the _rev calculation? *minus the variable digest/signature idea, which could be discussed separately. My question would be: how often does the “same doc, but different _revs

Re: db/_all_conflicts

2016-03-30 Thread Adam Kocoloski
> On Mar 30, 2016, at 6:26 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> >> On 29 Mar 2016, at 20:14, Adam Kocoloski > > wrote: >> >> Neat stuff. Years ago I actually committed this feature to the codebase >> using a table scan and then

Re: db/_all_conflicts

2016-03-30 Thread Jan Lehnardt
> On 29 Mar 2016, at 20:14, Adam Kocoloski wrote: > > Neat stuff. Years ago I actually committed this feature to the codebase using > a table scan and then Damien backed it out because of the scalability > concern. Glad to see we’re approaching it in a more considered

Re: [NEWS] Your links for the CouchDB Weekly News?

2016-03-30 Thread Rohit Agarwal
Blog submission for Open source Spark connector that could also work with CouchDB: https://developer.ibm.com/clouddataservices/2016/03/09/introducing-spark-cloudant-connector/ Regards, Rohit Agarwal From: Jenn Turner To: undisclosed-recipients:; Date: