I've uploaded all of the stuff to dist, so we should now be ready for
release in ~24h. Observing our release timing, I'll probably release
in about 32 hours.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Woo, thanks Dirkjan!
On 8 April 2014 11:03, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
I've uploaded all of the stuff to dist, so we should now be ready for
release in ~24h. Observing our release timing, I'll probably release
in about 32 hours.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
--
Noah Slater
woot! thanks a lot Dirkjan ...
Cheers
Andy
On 8 April 2014 11:07, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Woo, thanks Dirkjan!
On 8 April 2014 11:03, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
I've uploaded all of the stuff to dist, so we should now be ready for
release in ~24h. Observing
Since the vote passed shouldn't we have 1.5.1 tarballs available? I
didn't think that the official packages should hold up releasing the
source version. This is especially useful for other release folks
building updates for distros, etc.
Wendall
On 04/03/2014 02:28 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
Wendal, we tend to wait if it's only going to be a short period. Has
more impact.
On 4 April 2014 18:19, Wendall Cada wenda...@apache.org wrote:
Since the vote passed shouldn't we have 1.5.1 tarballs available? I didn't
think that the official packages should hold up releasing the source
So the tarball can't be generated and signed, pushed without announcing?
Shouldn't an official signed tarball be what the official packages are
built from? That was my understanding. Otherwise, the packages are being
build from git, and may not match the release. Or is the assumption made
that
The packages aren't official. :) They're provided as conveniences by
members of the community. So they can be prepared however. It's good
practice to prepare it from the tarball we voted on though!
On 4 April 2014 18:52, Wendall Cada wenda...@apache.org wrote:
So the tarball can't be generated
On 02 Apr 2014, at 22:27 , Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 19:18 , Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
I count 6 +1 votes, so the vote has passed. I'll attempt to do the
release tomorrow.
On 03 Apr 2014, at 20:30 , Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 22:27 , Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 19:18 , Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
I count 6 +1 votes,
Hey Jan,
sigs ok
verify installation ok
+1
Cheers
Andy
On 3 April 2014 21:40, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On 03 Apr 2014, at 20:30 , Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 22:27 , Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 19:18 , Dirkjan
Following Jan's lead, the 1.5.1 Windows binaries for R14B04 and R16B02 are
also available on Dropbox:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hvpohcey3og9wm6/setup-couchdb-1.5.1_R14B04.exe
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ee79wtzgvfss169/setup-couchdb-1.5.1_R14B04.exe.md5
Installs fine, old DBs still visible, install verifies.
It didn't automatically open in my browser, though (FF, beta channel).
I might have disabled that in a previous release? Not sure if that
was even possible. The checkbox in the menu was unchecked.
+1
Eli
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:30
On 03 Apr 2014, at 22:45 , Eli Stevens (Gmail) wickedg...@gmail.com wrote:
Installs fine, old DBs still visible, install verifies.
It didn't automatically open in my browser, though (FF, beta channel).
I might have disabled that in a previous release? Not sure if that
was even possible.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
I count 6 +1 votes, so the vote has passed. I'll attempt to do the
release tomorrow.
I kind of always forget this step, but we should probably have
binaries for this?
On 02 Apr 2014, at 19:18 , Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
I count 6 +1 votes, so the vote has passed. I'll attempt to do the
release tomorrow.
I kind of always forget this step, but we should probably have
I have Windows ones for Erlang R14B04, but won't be able to build R16 until
tomorrow evening. I'll do that unless anyone else gets in first. I'm also
not quite sure what needs to be done with them, but I'm sure it won't be
too hard to figure out.
Nick
On 2 April 2014 21:27, Jan Lehnardt
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
Please remember that rc.1 is an annotation. If the vote passes,
these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.5.1.
I count 6 +1 votes, so the vote has passed. I'll attempt to do the
release tomorrow.
Cheers,
Cheers Dirkjan! :D
On 1 April 2014 18:37, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
Please remember that rc.1 is an annotation. If the vote passes,
these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.5.1.
I count 6 +1
On 27 Mar 2014, at 22:39 , Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.5.1-rc.1.
Changes since last round:
*
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.5.x
We encourage the whole community to
Windows 8.1, Erlang R14B04.
Hashes OK
Javascript tests all passed (the Windows build cannot run the etap tests,
so can't check the large attachments failure)
+1
On 28 March 2014 04:49, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
Copy it here too:
Gentoo Linux Erlang R16B02, SM 1.8.5: all
Hi,
I have tested on Mac OS 10.9.2
hashes ok
application is running locally
+1 with also ignoring the failed 04-replication-large-atts.t test
Cheers
On 28 March 2014 09:11, Nick North nort...@gmail.com wrote:
Windows 8.1, Erlang R14B04.
Hashes OK
Javascript tests all passed (the Windows
+1
md5, sha, sig, ish OK
diff vs src OK
debian 7 x64
OTP R16b03-1 (via esl solutions)
SM 1.8.5 (via cloudant)
LGTM thanks everybody for this!
A+
Dave
On 28 March 2014 09:57, Andy Wenk andyw...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I have tested on Mac OS 10.9.2
hashes ok
application is running
Dear community,
I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.5.1-rc.1.
Changes since last round:
*
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.5.x
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
artefacts so that any critical issues can be
+1
All tests pass. Fedora 20 x86_64
Wendall
On 03/27/2014 02:39 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.5.1-rc.1.
Changes since last round:
*
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.5.x
We encourage the
Copy it here too:
Gentoo Linux Erlang R16B02, SM 1.8.5: all tests passed
FreeBSD 9 Erlang R15B03, SM 1.7.0: all tests passed
FreeBSD 10 Erlang R16B02, SM 1.7.0: replication test failed due to
1986 issue. Expect the same results for OSX 10.9.2
Hashes ok.
+1 (ignoring the issue, we don't have the
25 matches
Mail list logo
