On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
All,
It's been a while since we released and I want to change this now. I
propose making a 1.3.x branch from today's master
(66529378dd06342929e04772370f3509cbe786a5) and building 1.3.0 there.
As I understand, the
On 24 October 2012 09:01, Jason Smith j...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
All,
It's been a while since we released and I want to change this now. I
propose making a 1.3.x branch from today's master
All,
It's been a while since we released and I want to change this now. I
propose making a 1.3.x branch from today's master
(66529378dd06342929e04772370f3509cbe786a5) and building 1.3.0 there.
As I understand, the principal outstanding issues blocking the 1.3.0
release are;
1) Randall Leed's
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Can I get some votes on my proposal to branch today please?
Yes, please!
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
All,
It's been a while since we released and I want to change this now. I
propose making a 1.3.x branch from today's master
(66529378dd06342929e04772370f3509cbe786a5) and building 1.3.0 there.
As I understand, the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
2) The CORS patch. This has been around for a very long time but has
not reached our repository in any form. Earlier this month I proposed
that if it does not appear in usable form by the end of the calendar
month, it
On Oct 23, 2012, at 18:42 , Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
All,
It's been a while since we released and I want to change this now. I
propose making a 1.3.x branch from today's master
(66529378dd06342929e04772370f3509cbe786a5) and building 1.3.0 there.
As I understand, the
... to get the other things out and move to the plan of regular
releases we promised so many months ago.
On 23 October 2012 17:51, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
All,
It's been a while since we released and I
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
All,
It's been a while since we released and I want to change this now. I
propose making a 1.3.x branch from today's master
Appreciate you are busy, and appreciate even more getting the code out
tomorrow. My point remains that we should be time-based not
feature-based now, it's no harm to bump to 1.4.
That said, CORS in 1.3 would be awesome.
On 23 October 2012 17:53, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Branching would free master for commits that are not destined to go in 1.3.
The reason to branch is to get some focus and momentum around the
1.3.0 release. And it seems to be working.
B.
On 23 October 2012 18:01, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:51 PM,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
... to get the other things out and move to the plan of regular
releases we promised so many months ago.
In other worlds we do the inverse though ...
- benoit
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Branching would free master for commits that are not destined to go in 1.3.
The reason to branch is to get some focus and momentum around the
1.3.0 release. And it seems to be working.
B.
Let's reformulate , why not
On Oct 23, 2012, at 19:03 , Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
... to get the other things out and move to the plan of regular
releases we promised so many months ago.
In other worlds we do the inverse though
I'm happy to defer branching until 11/5 as long as we're clear that
anything not on master by that date will not appear in the 1.3
release.
After 1.3, I want us to execute on the roadmap process we discussed in
Dublin (documented here:
https://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Roadmap_Process) where we
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
I'm happy to defer branching until 11/5 as long as we're clear that
anything not on master by that date will not appear in the 1.3
release.
agree.
After 1.3, I want us to execute on the roadmap process we discussed in
16 matches
Mail list logo
