Re: include_atttachments=true include_docs=true

2012-08-01 Thread Alexander Shorin
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote: Included docs are processed only on query not on indexation so it shouldn't be a problem and will never raise an error in the query servers anyway. It still consumes some RAM when fetching the results but people should

Re: include_atttachments=true include_docs=true

2012-08-01 Thread Robert Newson
The attachment data would be streamed, not fully materialized into memory, so the difference is the size of an attachment chunk (which is under 8k iirc). B. On 1 Aug 2012, at 08:46, Benoit Chesneau wrote: Hi, I'm tempted to add support for an optional `include_attachments` query parameter

[jira] [Created] (COUCHDB-1519) Allow validate_doc_update.js to be aware if the update went through an update function before

2012-08-01 Thread Damjan Georgievski (JIRA)
Damjan Georgievski created COUCHDB-1519: --- Summary: Allow validate_doc_update.js to be aware if the update went through an update function before Key: COUCHDB-1519 URL:

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1519) Allow validate_doc_update.js to be aware if the update went through an update function before

2012-08-01 Thread Robert Newson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13426510#comment-13426510 ] Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-1519: I'm -1 on this because these two

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1519) Allow validate_doc_update.js to be aware if the update went through an update function before

2012-08-01 Thread Damjan Georgievski (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13426521#comment-13426521 ] Damjan Georgievski commented on COUCHDB-1519: - The two mechanisms will stay

Re: Docs, second try

2012-08-01 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
snip, hopefully a summary. Situation: Our docs are sucky, fragmented and what there is needs some attention (wiki, couchbase, guide). Couchbase has kindly donated DocBook[1] format API docs, and the tools to manage that. Woot! We don't have a clear understanding of what we are trying to produce

Re: Docs, second try

2012-08-01 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@muse.net.nz wrote: Do we have a concensus now to go for RST python nirvana? If we do, a proposed plan forward, with Dave and Robert N.: - Keep the docs branch as it is, with DocBook docs - Iterate on the Sphinx docs in the docs branch (for

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1519) Allow validate_doc_update.js to be aware if the update went through an update function before

2012-08-01 Thread Robert Newson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13426534#comment-13426534 ] Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-1519: So this request is better described as

Re: Docs, second try

2012-08-01 Thread Noah Slater
Dirkjan, Texinfo is important because we are using Autotools, and it expects texinfo so it can install info pages. Autotools comes with a toolchain which will convert texinfo into other formats for you, for free. The user doesn't need anything installed locally on their machine. This is why I

Re: Docs, second try

2012-08-01 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: What is Pytohn nirvana? Is that related to the Sphinx effort I checked out towards the end of this thread? Sphinx is written in Python, but I'm not sure why Dave mentioned the Python nirvana. You don't need to write any

Re: Docs, second try

2012-08-01 Thread Noah Slater
That's fine. Just get the Sphinx makefile working enough to generate the docs in the current working directory. Then merge your docs branch to master. At that point, I will convert your makefile into an Autotools makefile, and hook it up with all the right stuff. Sounds like we have consensus, and

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1519) Allow validate_doc_update.js to be aware if the update went through an update function before

2012-08-01 Thread Damjan Georgievski (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13426833#comment-13426833 ] Damjan Georgievski commented on COUCHDB-1519: - Having the request object in

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1519) Allow validate_doc_update.js to be aware if the update went through an update function before

2012-08-01 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13426848#comment-13426848 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1519: -- Sometimes you update a document