Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-12-07 Thread Noah Slater
Great! On 7 December 2012 07:15, Hans J Schroeder h...@cloudno.de wrote: On Thursday, December 6, 2012, Noah Slater wrote: Hans, cool. I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE, you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then

Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-12-06 Thread Noah Slater
Hans, cool. I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE, you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then upload it to our packages dist dir. [1] (Does this sound sensible? I only propose that Jan build it because he is the guy uploading it. But

Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-12-06 Thread Jan Lehnardt
I’m game. On Dec 6, 2012, at 23:30 , Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Hans, cool. I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE, you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then upload it to our packages dist dir. [1] (Does this sound

Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-12-06 Thread Hans J Schroeder
On Thursday, December 6, 2012, Noah Slater wrote: Hans, cool. I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE, you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then upload it to our packages dist dir. [1] (Does this sound sensible? I only propose

Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-12-04 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On Dec 3, 2012, at 10:59 , Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Can you clarify? COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that

Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-12-03 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Can you clarify? COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB. But AIUI this is

Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-12-02 Thread Noah Slater
On 28 November 2012 15:38, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: It would be really nice if some effort was spent on making it easier to use system versions of dependencies, but I believe that is targeted for the near future? Can you clarify? -- NS

Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-12-02 Thread Noah Slater
Hans, When we cut the 1.3 release in the next few days (we are blocked on one bug) will you be able to co-ordinate with me and Dave to produce an OS X package. I am hoping that you are able to build this from the release artefact, and then we can upload it to our regular dist directory. (I have

Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-12-02 Thread Hans J Schroeder
Great news. The last test build I did went ok. - Hans On Sunday, December 2, 2012, Noah Slater wrote: Hans, When we cut the 1.3 release in the next few days (we are blocked on one bug) will you be able to co-ordinate with me and Dave to produce an OS X package. I am hoping that you are

Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-11-29 Thread Hans J Schroeder
On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote: - are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer? yes, for Mac OS X - alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the maintainer) would be fine - is the link below correct for your platform?

Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-11-28 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
Hi Packagers/Maintainers, Thanks for the efforts you put into wrapping CouchDB! We'd like to sort out any packaging or distribution issues early in our 1.3.0 release cycle. Those of you whom I know of, or are interested, I've BCCd. Could you either reply back to the list (or directly to me if

Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release

2012-11-28 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote: - are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer? Yes, for Gentoo. - alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the maintainer) would be fine - is the link below correct for your platform?