[X] +1 : release ApacheDS 2.0.0-M21
Regards
Felix
[X] +1 Release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M33
Regards
Felix
Building by mvn clean install I get the following error using tag
1.0.0-M32 (using JDK 1.7 or 1.8):
Running org.apache.directory.api.util.GeneralizedTimeTest
Tests run: 48, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.114
sec <<< FAILURE! - in
Am 08.06.2015 um 20:01 schrieb Stefan Seelmann:
On 06/08/2015 07:09 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
On 06/08/2015 07:00 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 08/06/15 18:41, Felix Knecht a écrit :
The building itself not, but unzipping and running works without any
problem, it even takes over the old
On 06/08/2015 07:00 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 08/06/15 18:41, Felix Knecht a écrit :
The building itself not, but unzipping and running works without any
problem, it even takes over the old configuration.
It seems to me that the application start takes a bit longer then the
former
The building itself not, but unzipping and running works without any
problem, it even takes over the old configuration.
It seems to me that the application start takes a bit longer then the
former milestone, but this is just my impression (us usual newer things
are expected to be better faster
+1
Great works
Regards
Felix
On 06/07/2015 10:55 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi all,
after almost 2 years I'm very pleased to present a new release of Apache
Directory Studio.
There are 69 resolved issues.
* Many of them are related to the migration of the build system to Tycho.
* Another
laptop (which has an SSD). But I think I
saw that before on a machine with spindle HDD. Maybe it has to do with
too many fsync when writing to disk?
Kind Regards,
Stefan
On 03/24/2015 06:44 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
Hi
Just for the record. Looks like this is the test taking much longer
+1
Interesting thing to me when using 'clean install':
- JDK 1.7 takes 4m30s to build successful
- JDK 1.8 takes 48s to build successful
Is this huge time difference between different JDK versions
reproduceable by anyone else?
Regards
Felix
On 03/22/2015 04:40 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi
Just for the record. Looks like this is the test taking much longer in
JDK 1.7:
Running org.apache.directory.mavibot.btree.PersistedBTreeBrowseTest
Browse Forward for 9 = 4320
Browe backward for 9 = 5125
Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 2, Time elapsed: 235.79
sec - in
[X] +1 Release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M28
Builds on Fedora 21-64 Java 1.7.0-55
Regards
Felix
What about: Argos ?
Sorry, but I could only find the a German wikipedia entry:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argos_(Riese)
On 01/05/2015 04:14 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys,
I created a new thread dedicated to this task, no need to polute one
which is not related.
So we currently
+0
Sorry, no PC near me and it's hard to do any tests on my mobile ;-)
I wish you all a Merry X-mas and a happy New Year
Regards
Felix
On 12/24/2014 08:03 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the 27th milestone of the 1.0.0 LDAP API/Shared, 1.0.0-M27.
We have added a
[X] +1 : release ApacheDS 2.0.0-M18
Built on Linux-64 Java 8 all tests passing
Thanks
Felix
On 11/14/2014 12:47 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
A second attempt to get an ApacheDS 2.0.0-M18 release !
We have discovered some critical bugs on the previous release, when it was
tested with
[X] +1 Release Mavibot 1.0.0-M6
Build in linux-64 Java 8, test are passing
Felix
On 11/12/2014 12:37 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
This is the sixth release of Apache Mavibot, the MVCC BTree in Java !
This release contains a full support for bulkload for persisted btrees,
eitehr with
[X] +1 Release JDBM 2.0.0-M3
Build on linux-64 Java 8, test are passing.
Felix
On 11/12/2014 02:30 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
This is the third release of Apache JDBM, the BTree implementation we currently
use for ApacheDS.
There is no fix in it but the packaging (which changes from
+1 Builds and tests run through smoothly.
Thanks and regards
Felix
On 11/07/2014 02:47 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
a second attempt to get it released, after a bug has been fixed in the
sort control grammar.
This is a vote for the 25th milestone of the 1.0.0 LDAP API/Shared,
[X] +1Yes, accept it and make it a subproject of Directory
Regards
Felix
Builds and Tests are running smooth for me.
[X] +1 Release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M24
On 07/29/2014 06:35 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the 24th milestone of the 1.0.0 LDAP API/Shared,
1.0.0-M24.
It's a bug fix release.
It contains a few bug fixes, plus a security fix
+1
Regards
Felix
On 06/29/2014 06:02 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
This is the first release of Apache Mavibot, the MVCC BTree in Java !
This milestone is the fifth step toward a complete MVCC implementation. The
main added features are :
- bulk load implementation
- subtrees handling
+1
Regards
Felix
On 06/30/2014 07:32 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the 23th milestone of the 1.0.0 LDAP API/Shared,
1.0.0-M23.
It's a bug fix release.
It contains a few bug fixes and improvements, and some feature added by Lucas
(Templating for LdapConnection) :
Bugs
+1
Thanks and regards
Felix
On 06/30/2014 04:44 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
it's time for a new release of ApacheDS, version 2.0.0-M17.
Still a bug fix release, but we added the bulk_loader feature in a separate
module.
The list of fixed bugs and improvments is the following :
Bugs
.
The problem is just that we get used to it that this never happend
before IIRC.
Thanks
Felix
On 04/21/2014 10:58 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
The order in which elements are stored in a HashMap has changed in JDK 8...
Le 4/20/14 6:39 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit :
Le 4/20/14 5:20 PM, Felix
[X] +1 Release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M22
Builds with JDK1.7 without errors.
Just because I was curious:
When building with (I think we're still on JDK1.6 or 1.7) JDK1.8 (linux
64-bit) I get following integration test failure
Tests run: 37, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
[X] +1 Release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M21
Looks good to me.
Thanks
Felix
[X] +1 Release Mavibot 1.0.0-M4
Looks good to me.
Thanks
Felix
[X] +1 : release ApacheDS 2.0.0-M16
Looks good to me.
Thanks
Felix
[X] +1 Release Mavibot 1.0.0-M2
Source builds fine from tag and from dist with JDK 1.6 and 1.7.
Regards
Felix
On 10/29/2013 10:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
This is the second release of Apache Mavibot, the MVCC BTree in Java !
This milestone is an improvement on the way we handle
On 08/15/2013 11:00 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
I think I have fixed the issue (MAVIBOT-6), but if Felix can check that
I have not added too much things in the pom tat would be great !
Thanks for quick patch :-)
I'll find some time to verify it today afternoon/evening. But are you
sure
:
Le 8/15/13 7:39 AM, Felix Knecht a écrit :
As Kiran already mentioned, it builds only with JDK 1.7. Could it be
that Mavibot was build using JDK 1.7?
Running
org.apache.directory.server.core.partition.impl.btree.mavibot.MavibotRdnIndexTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
there...
Le 15 août 2013 11:23, Felix Knecht fel...@apache.org
mailto:fel...@apache.org a écrit :
On 08/15/2013 11:00 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
I think I have fixed the issue (MAVIBOT-6), but if Felix can
check that
I have not added too much things
Builds with JDK 1.6, 1.7 on Linux
[X] +1 Release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M20
Regards
Felix
As Kiran already mentioned, it builds only with JDK 1.7. Could it be
that Mavibot was build using JDK 1.7?
Running
org.apache.directory.server.core.partition.impl.btree.mavibot.MavibotRdnIndexTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.034
sec FAILURE! - in
[X] +1 Release Mavibot 1.0.0-M1
Regards
Felix
[X] +1 : make Mavibot a Directory Subproject
Regards
Felix
Tested on linux 64bit
[X] +1 : Release Apache Directory Studio 2.0.0-M8 (2.0.0.v20130628)
Thanks
Felix
[X] +1 Release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M19 and ApacheDS 2.0.0-M14
Thanks
Felix
[X] +1 Release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M18
Thanks
Felix
Build, tests and tar.gz passes/run for me
[X] +1 : release ApacheDS 2.0.0-M13
Thanks
Felix
Sorry, I don't have any time to test.
[X] +/- 0 : I don't care
Regards
Felix
[X] +1 : release ApacheDS 2.0.0-M12
Felix
[X] +1 Release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M17
Felix
No problems with unzipping this time.
[X] +1 : Release Apache Directory Studio 2.0.0-M6 (2.0.0.v20130308)
Thanks
Felix
On 03/09/2013 07:08 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
Hi,
Here's a proposal for a new release of Apache Directory Studio.
Here are the release notes:
*Bug*
-
of this because this time we're using the latest version of
the maven-assembly plugin. I don't know...
Anyways, I regenerated the tar.gz distributions by hand tonight and replaced
them online.
They should be fine now.
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
On 1 févr. 2013, at 21:07, Felix Knecht fel
[X] -1 : No, don't release Apache Directory Studio 2.0.0-M5
I'm feeling very sorry to say that I have the permission problem again
on both *.tar.gz (x86, x86_64) :-(
Anyway enjoy your vacation!
Regards
Felix
x86:
tar:
ApacheDirectoryStudio-linux-x86-2.0.0.v20130131/configuration/config.ini:
[X] +1 : Release Apache Directory Studio 2.0.0-M4 (2.0.0.v20130125)
Thanks
Felix
[X] -1 : No, don't release Apache Directory Studio 2.0.0-M4 (2.0.0.v20130123)
- I downloaded the *.tar.gz file.
- gunzip it as regular linux user
- untar it as regular linux user
and get a bunch of permission denied errors, see below. I even can't
changed to the untared directory nor remove it
[X] +1 : release Apache Directory LDAP API 1.0.0-M15 and ApacheDS 2.0.0-M10
For Linux Dist the apacheds.sh script isn't executable (from downloaded
*.tar.gz). This was/is also already the case for ApacheDS-M9. IMO we
should try to get the executable flags set in the tar.gz - at least for
... That part hasn't moved
much since the latest released version.
I'm investigating...
Thanks for the heads up, Felix!
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
On 24 janv. 2013, at 22:06, Felix Knecht fel...@apache.org wrote:
[X] -1 : No, don't release Apache Directory Studio 2.0.0-M4
(2.0.0.v20130123)
- I
[X] +1 | Release Apache Directory LDAP API/Shared 1.0.0-M14,
Note that the correct svn tag is M14 instead of M13. Probably just a
copy/paste problem.
- SVN tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M14/
Regards
Felix
On 12/21/2012 05:28 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if the failing test is a problem of mine:
[felix@www 2.0.0-M9]$ mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 09:44:56+0100)
Maven home: /etc/alternatives/mvn
Java version: 1.7.0_07, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/jdk1.7.0_07/jre
Default locale: en_US,
[X] +1 | Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M8
Thanks
Felix
[X] +1 | Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M7
Regards
Felix
[X] +1 | Release Apache Directory LDAP API/Shared 1.0.0-M12,
Thanks and regards
Felix
[X] +1 | Release Apache Directory Studio 2.0.0-M3 (2.0.0.v20120224),
as well as Apache Directory LDAP API/Shared 1.0.0-M11, ApacheDS JDBM
(2.0.0-M1) and ApacheDS 2.0.0-M6
Good job!
Just one small issue that could be fixed later:
The apacheds-2.0.0-M6/bin/apacheds.sh (in the
[X] +1 : Make JDBM a separate project
Regards
Felix
[X] +1 | Release Apache Directory Studio 2.0.0-M2 (2.0.0.v20120111), as well as
Apache Directory LDAP API/Shared 1.0.0-M10 and ApacheDS 2.0.0-M5
Good job!
Felix
[X] +1 | Release Apache Directory Studio 2.0.0-M1 (2.0.0.v20120111)
Thanks
Felix
[X] +1 | Release Apache Directory Studio Maven Plugin 1.0.5
Documentation looks good now, thanks for fixing it.
Regards
Felix
Hi Pierre-Arnaud
The (IMO) main part of the documentation has not been generated - the
'GOALS' part
(http://directory.apache.org/studio-plugin/gen-docs/1.0.5/plugin-info.html)
- fixed by commit (1214811). If it doesn't matters as the plugin is
mainly used by ourself I'm +1, but it would be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13166246#comment-13166246
]
Felix Knecht commented on DIRSERVER-1678:
-
Hi Pierre-Arnaud
It should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13165849#comment-13165849
]
Felix Knecht commented on DIRSERVER-1678:
-
Done for Basic User's Guide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13165852#comment-13165852
]
Felix Knecht commented on DIRSERVER-1678:
-
Todo:
- Fix the internal links
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13164181#comment-13164181
]
Felix Knecht commented on DIRSERVER-1678:
-
Done for Advanced User's Guide
Move wiki pages to svn
--
Key: DIRSERVER-1678
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1678
Project: Directory ApacheDS
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M4
Reporter: Felix Knecht
Hi guys,
since I bumped up the project's plugin version, we have Jenkins failures.
This is dur to a bug in the maven-felix-plugin 2.3.5
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3037) which uses a method
available only in Java 6.
Here we have 3 options :
- switch to Java 6 on Jenkins
On 11/21/2011 09:06 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to release a new project pom (version 25).
+1
We could even update parent pom from
org.apache/apache-9.pom - apache-10.pom I think, but this can also be
done in a later release.
Thanks
Felix
Changes [1]: Bumped up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Knecht updated DIRSHARED-122:
---
Attachment: sign.patch
maven-gpg-plugin signs attached artifacts. By default
(http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13142421#comment-13142421
]
Felix Knecht commented on DIRSHARED-122:
IMO it does, you need to have a look
Following changes have been made up to now:
- Refactored maven-skin to single project james-skin (and released)
- Merged pluginManagement section from other projects including
configuration
- Simplified site/reporting switch
- Merged weare.xml document into pom.xml
- Updated to latest plugin
Sorry, wrong list ...
On 10/21/2011 06:10 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
Following changes have been made up to now:
- Refactored maven-skin to single project james-skin (and released)
- Merged pluginManagement section from other projects including
configuration
- Simplified site/reporting switch
On 10/19/2011 07:06 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
I have spent my day switching the LDAP API documentation from confluence
to the new system Stefan has tested. It works like a charm !
I have created a PDF from the files you can find in
*https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Knecht resolved DIRSERVER-1664.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1178145view=rev
except
Hi
ApacheDs and probably also Shared has in many locations file operations
like File.[delete|mkdir|...] where the return value (true|false) is
unchecked. In Java-1.7 exists static methods for this in
java.nio.file.Files [1] where an IOException is thrown if the operation
fails, in Java-1.7
On 10/01/2011 06:32 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 10/1/11 4:32 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
Hi
ApacheDs and probably also Shared has in many locations file
operations like File.[delete|mkdir|...] where the return value
(true|false) is unchecked. In Java-1.7 exists static methods
%28java.io.File%29
Le 1 oct. 2011 18:42, Felix Knechtfel...@apache.org a écrit :
On 10/01/2011 06:32 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 10/1/11 4:32 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
Hi
ApacheDs and probably also Shared has in many locations file
operations like File.[delete|mkdir|...] where the return
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M4
Reporter: Felix Knecht
Assignee: Felix Knecht
Fix For: 2.0.0-M4
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Knecht resolved DIRSERVER-1658.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M4
Fixed in http://svn.apache.org
abstain
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Felix Knechtfel...@apache.org wrote:
On 09/10/2011 08:23 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 9/10/11 7:50 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
On 09/10/2011 12:45 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 9/9/11 10:21 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
I can't build the tagged source
On 09/10/2011 08:23 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 9/10/11 7:50 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
On 09/10/2011 12:45 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 9/9/11 10:21 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
I can't build the tagged source (Revision 1167253) because of failing
test cases when doing a checkout (of course
Fix performance findings by findbugs
Key: DIRSERVER-1658
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1658
Project: Directory ApacheDS
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Felix Knecht
On 09/09/2011 05:08 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
while running mvn site-reploy, I get this trace :
I haven't tried yet, but Issue MDEP-187 seems to show a workaround
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-187
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-98
...
[INFO] Configured Artifact:
I can't build the tagged source (Revision 1167253) because of failing
test cases when doing a checkout (of course starting also with an empty
local maven repository). See files.
[felix@asgard apacheds-m3]$ svn info
Path: .
URL: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds/tags/2.0.0-M3
On 09/10/2011 12:45 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 9/9/11 10:21 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
I can't build the tagged source (Revision 1167253) because of failing
test cases when doing a checkout (of course starting also with an
empty local maven repository). See files.
H...
I just checked
[X] +1 Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M3
Regards
Felix
Hi
Sorry, but to me this vote looks quite messy:
- We talking about the 8th milstone (as mentioned also in the subject),
but in mail text you're talking about 1.0.0-M7
- The (new ?) vote is started in the mail thread of [VOTE] Release of
Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M2 and Shared/Ldap API
On 08/31/2011 09:08 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
On 30 août 2011, at 15:32, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
Hi,
we just had a private convo with Pierre-Arnaud about coding rules. We are not
following exactly the same type of rules in Studio and in ADS, which is quite
normal. There
Hi Pierre-Arnaud,
On 08/31/2011 10:33 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
Hi Felix,
On 31 août 2011, at 10:07, Felix Knecht wrote:
On 08/31/2011 09:08 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
On 30 août 2011, at 15:32, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
Hi,
we just had a private convo
[X] +1 Release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M7 and Apache Directory Server
Thanks
Felix
[X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M6
Regards
Felix
Please cast your votes:
[X] +1 - Move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory
Studio sub-projects
Regards
Felix
[X] +1 - Merge the DIRSHARED and DIRAPI spaces in JIRA
Avoid the disorder of having a JIRA space and no project.
Regards
Felix
Hi all
I just read following snippet in the user ML
The user documentation for Studio is
written in Docbook and under version control in SVN [2]. For the
server we also started to move the user documentation to Docbook and
SVN, but I'm not sure what's the state here. I think it needs to be
[X] +1 Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M1
Regards
Felix
[X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M5
Regards
Felix
On 06/10/2011 08:16 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
we already discussed this topic two weeks ago, but now, I think we should
really move on.
Yesterday, I did a bug parade and started to fix issues. We have now 197 of
301 issues fixed, which is a HUGE number
of fixed issues. Add to
, at 07:59, Felix Knecht wrote:
I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5 is needed
[1] and the the artifacts to be released seem to be compiled with Java 1.6 (at
least the included MANIFEST.MF files are indicating so).
If it doesn't matters we should at least think about
I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5 is
needed [1] and the the artifacts to be released seem to be compiled with
Java 1.6 (at least the included MANIFEST.MF files are indicating so).
If it doesn't matters we should at least think about prerequisiting Java
1.6 for
On 04/20/2011 08:16 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 4/20/11 7:19 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
Hi Emmanuel
Thanks for big effort and preparing a release.
I'm not sure if it's a problem or not: The maven-metadata.xml doesn't
contains former releases. This may prevent e.g. using tab completion
[+1] Release Shared 1.0.0-M3
And let's trust in Nexus to update the maven-metadata.xml
1 - 100 of 1156 matches
Mail list logo
