Richard S. Hall wrote:
Unless I am missing something, this bundle contains code from the OSGi
Alliance, but does not include them in the NOTICE file...
:( yes, you're right - do you think that this is a showstopper and I
should cut a new release?
I would be in favour of that...
regards,
+1
regards,
Karl
On Jan 31, 2008 8:59 PM, Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
- richard
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
I've compiled the release candidate for our first official configadmin
release (1.0.0) and put it up here:
+1
regards,
Karl
On Jan 31, 2008 9:02 PM, Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
- richard
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
I've compiled the release candidate for our first official eventadmin
release (1.0.0) and put it up here:
+1
regards,
Karl
On Jan 31, 2008 9:05 PM, Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
- richard
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
I've compiled the release candidate for our first official metatype
release (1.0.0) and put it up here:
+1
regards,
Karl
On Jan 31, 2008 9:12 PM, Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
- richard
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
I've compiled the release candidate for our first official SCR release
(1.0.0) and put it up here:
Time to call the vote on the Felix 1.0.3 framework and main release as
well as the bundlerepository 1.0.2.
* +1 votes from Stuart McCulloch, Karl Pauls, Carsten Ziegeler, Felix
Meschberger, Emil Ivov, Marcel Offermans, Guillaume Nodet, Alex
Karasulu, Alin Dreghiciu, Richard S. Hall, Didier
Hi folks,
I've compiled a minor fix to the org.osgi.service.obr sub-project.
This fixes a problem I discovered recently where the ${pom.groupId}
field in the dependency list was being interpreted wrongly by Maven
when using the OBR plugin with a parameter of -DgroupId=example
To see this in
Hi,
Shouldn't org.osgi.service.obr be a bundle not a plain jar? I know
that is included into org.apache.felix.bundlerepository bundle but why
it should not be a stand alone bundle?
Something related (maybe) is that org.apache.felix.bundlerepository:
1. exports org.osgi.service.obr package
On Feb 1, 2008 1:19 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Niall / Stuart,
thanks for your answers. It looks like the usage patterns
of OSGi in the Apache and Eclipse communities are just
a bit different: Apache focuses on packages whereas Eclipse
focuses on Bundle granularity
Hello Niall / Stuart,
thanks for your answers. It looks like the usage patterns
of OSGi in the Apache and Eclipse communities are just
a bit different: Apache focuses on packages whereas Eclipse
focuses on Bundle granularity for Re-use.
That's why we don't explicitly import all exported
+1
Minor nit, the NOTICE file in the JAR is different than the NOTICE file
in the project...this may be the case with other releases too...we
should probably have them be the same.
I could just copy it from the subproject root to the resource directory
and commit, but did we decide on a way
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Unless I am missing something, this bundle contains code from the
OSGi Alliance, but does not include them in the NOTICE file...
:( yes, you're right - do you think that this is a showstopper and I
should cut a new release?
Probably easier.
On Feb 1, 2008 4:07 PM, Stuart McCulloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/02/2008, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to add bnd 0.0.236 to the maven repo so I can try
out these new features with Felix's bundle plugin?
On 01/02/2008, Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Minor nit, the NOTICE file in the JAR is different than the NOTICE file
in the project...this may be the case with other releases too...we
should probably have them be the same.
whoops, forgot to remove the leftover NOTICE and
On 01/02/2008, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to add bnd 0.0.236 to the maven repo so I can try
out these new features with Felix's bundle plugin?
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/biz/aQute/bndlib/
FYI, this is already in progress - Carlos Sanchez is sorting out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on FELIX-459 started by Stuart McCulloch.
BND: allow customization of the uses clause in the generated Export-Package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stuart McCulloch resolved FELIX-459.
Resolution: Fixed
Updated pom to use bndlib 0.0.236 and deployed new snapshot
On Jan 30, 2008 11:31 AM, Stuart McCulloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01/2008, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Niclas,
The problem is (a) the generous synchronisation of Log4J and (b) locking
used by stuff used for class loading. In our projects we regularly face
Anyhow (see bellow) my vote is +1 as the changes does not influence
the discussion bellow.
Alin
On Feb 1, 2008 7:23 PM, Stuart McCulloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/02/2008, Alin Dreghiciu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Shouldn't org.osgi.service.obr be a bundle not a plain jar? I know
19 matches
Mail list logo
