[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Pauls resolved FELIX-463.
--
Resolution: Invalid
No. It doesn't work like this. You still need to make the packages your bundles
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stuart McCulloch reopened FELIX-463:
Re-opening, because I think we need to at least clarify the spec: it appears to
suggest we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stuart McCulloch updated FELIX-463:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Critical)
reducing priority, as there are other ways to do this (ie.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12558971#action_12558971
]
Karl Pauls commented on FELIX-463:
--
After re-reading the spec, I happen to agree. We should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12559020#action_12559020
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-463:
-
Hmm, as m_bootPkgs also contains the
Cannot retrieve service to be unbound in unbind method taking ServiceReference
--
Key: FELIX-464
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-464
Project: Felix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12559035#action_12559035
]
Lucas Galfaso commented on FELIX-463:
-
R 4.1 of the standard has a flow describing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger closed FELIX-464.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0
Fixed in Rev. 612093 and deployed new SNAPSHOT
Hello,
I have a test case in Apache Tuscany which fails intermittently when run
along with a lot of other OSGi-based tests under Felix.
I have three bundles A, B and C with distinct packages contained inside
them.
BundleA exports PackageA.
BundleB imports PackageA.
I use the system
Strange.
Off the top of my head I can think of two ways for this to happen:
1. PackageA is actually available from more than one place.
2. Felix' service filtering test has a bug in it.
Perhaps you could add some debugging printlns to your code to determine
which class loaders are being
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-463:
--
Attachment: bootdelegation.patch
Re: Felix does not start with bootdelegation=*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12559085#action_12559085
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-463:
-
To me it looks good.
Re: Felix does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12559081#action_12559081
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-463:
---
How about my attached patch? It just checks
The IP clearance for Felix' Deployment Admin contribution is
successfully closed.
Thank you to those who looked into it.
- richard
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Could someone check IP clearance on the following contribution:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-deployment-admin.html
The vote for releasing the version 1.0.2 of our parent pom
passed successfully with
seven +1 votes from
Carsten Ziegeler
Stuart McCulloch
Niclas Hedhman
Felix Meschberger
Stefano Lenzi
Richard Hall
Karl Pauls
No other votes were cast.
I'll continue with uploading the release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12559162#action_12559162
]
Karl Pauls commented on FELIX-463:
--
To me too.
Re: Felix does not start with
It seems that some of these issues are arguments against Apache process,
so I am not sure what to say about that.
Further, I am not really certain about what is being said here. This
thread seems to imply that if we did rm -rf framework in our trunk
directory, then it would be possible for
Richard,
I dont think this is the problem in the filtering test because I can see
from the logs that the class used by the service object is different from
the class used by the bundle when the lookup is done. I have a list of print
statements taken from a segment of code in Tuscany when the
Is it possible that the class has been loaded from the bundle before
this test by a different thread? It looks like we could have a
visibility issue because the classloader is created lazily outside of
a any synchronized block...
regards,
Karl
On Jan 15, 2008 9:07 PM, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL
Karl,
Yes, I think it is possible that the class was loaded from the bundle on
another thread, because there is a bundle listener which does some
processing when the bundle moves to resolved state. Should I avoid
classloading in other threads, or is it something that can be fixed in
Felix?
Rajini,
I just commited a patch that should fix the visibility issue (if that
was the cause of your problems). Could you re-run your tests on the
current trunk and see whether that fixes the issue for you?
Alternatively, you can just use the deployed snapshot of the current
trunk from maven (in
Hi Carsten,
The vote on Commons FileUpload 1.2.1 has problems and it seems likely
that there will be a new RC since the issues are resolved by the
latest release of our parent pom. I've added OSGi parameters to its
pom in case the RM does cut another RC:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sahoo closed FELIX-463.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I updated my workspace from trunk and it now works. I am closing the issue per
mail from Richard
Clearly, not everything need be or can be developed at Felix, but the
implication that we might as well accept that Felix bundles will only
be used by Felix users seems awfully counter to all of the concepts
for which OSGi stands.
I'd totally agree here.
Whilst most Felix member use the
On Jan 16, 2008 3:06 PM, Rob Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
That's one reason I've always been reluctant to see the Felix Http Service
adorned or extended with features beyond the standard. I can see how
beneficial such extensions are, but they then mean bundles and
applications using
25 matches
Mail list logo
