David Crossley wrote:
Ron Blaschke wrote:
Ron Blaschke wrote:
I've started to look at things, and were able to look at the Cocoon
profiler things with forrest run in site-author/.
Here's a short, edited, sample:
body-index.html
NN Components(Role)Average time
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Thanks to David for the overview. IMO we should modularize this whole
discusion in different topics. The lenght of the thread scream for
SoC. :-)
Thank to Thorsten that kindly shared with the rest of us (that are not
participating on lenya-dev) the discussion
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-tuesday.html
6 September starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
The main topic for the day is internal structure XHTML2.
Also an ever-present task to clean up our Issue Tracker.
The main communication medium is still the
Dear committers,
Disclaimer:
I wrote this mail original to the PMC list, because it is directed to
committers only, and David, as PMC Head, asked me to post it to the dev
list. It is *not* addresses to devs nor user, it it addressed *only* to
*committers*. If you are not a committer I am *not*
The post mentioned in this issue asks for an XHTML 2.0 document, and to then
have it
validated against RelaxNG.
I can create a sample document and style sheet no problem, in fact I already
have*, but
without a schema in place, the document does not render the stylesheet, and
of course
I can
I have put up a basic xhtml sample document at
http://apache.minitutorials.com/xhtml2.html
I am basically just adding the whole list in order at the moment,
once all in and all working, then we can put all these into a
sample forrest document and use a style sheet of our own.
I guess this is
On 9/3/05, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
addi wrote:
Ok, I am not a PMC member nor committer so ignore/listen as you like.
That makes no difference. You are a community member
and we each listen to each other. By the way, when it
comes time to vote on this topic, then please do:
Hello infrastructure team,
I would like to ask whether it is possible to create a virtual list for
forrest and lenya. Like described in
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11200413271r=1w=2
If we make a virtual list (which I prefer) that posts mails on both
developer lists with added [lefo] in
forrest seed using views broken index.source.xml
Key: FOR-662
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-662
Project: Forrest
Type: Bug
Components: Views
Versions: 0.8-dev
Environment: Any
I just did svn update; build clean; build; forrest seed-basic; and
don't see this problem. Is your configuration unique? Have you svn
update/build clean/build and are working with the trunk?
--tim
On 9/3/05, kevin (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
forrest seed using views broken index.source.xml
Some tweaking with sublists can do the trick, although I actually never
used sublists..
http://www.ezmlm.org/faq/FAQ-14.html
Mvgr,
Martin
Leo Simons wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:41:23PM +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Hello infrastructure team,
Hi Thorsten!
I would like to ask
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:41:23PM +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Hello infrastructure team,
Hi Thorsten!
I would like to ask whether it is possible to create a virtual list for
forrest and lenya. Like described in
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11200413271r=1w=2
If we make a
Tim Williams wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
addi wrote:
Ok, I am not a PMC member nor committer so ignore/listen as you like.
That makes no difference. You are a community member
and we each listen to each other. By the way, when it
comes time to vote on this topic, then please do:
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 11:14 -0400, Tim Williams wrote:
I just did svn update; build clean; build; forrest seed-basic; and
don't see this problem. Is your configuration unique? Have you svn
update/build clean/build and are working with the trunk?
--tim
Yes default forrest and all updated.
On 9/3/05, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 11:14 -0400, Tim Williams wrote:
I just did svn update; build clean; build; forrest seed-basic; and
don't see this problem. Is your configuration unique? Have you svn
update/build clean/build and are working with the trunk?
A couple questions on this one...
o) export-link-vt.xml
- why is the filename xml instead of ft?
o) It appears that the sitemap entry that might make this work may
have been committed to the resume plugin but not the views stuff?
The second one appears to be causing FOR-662. I'll try to look
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 16:55 -0400, Tim Williams wrote:
On 9/3/05, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 11:14 -0400, Tim Williams wrote:
I just did svn update; build clean; build; forrest seed-basic; and
don't see this problem. Is your configuration unique? Have you svn
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 17:50 -0400, Tim Williams wrote:
A couple questions on this one...
o) export-link-vt.xml
- why is the filename xml instead of ft?
org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.view/resources/views/default.fv
Has the answer:
!-- You can group elements to a template and call it
Tim Williams wrote:
o) It appears that the sitemap entry that might make this work may
have been committed to the resume plugin but not the views stuff?
The second one appears to be causing FOR-662. I'll try to look more
into the second one tonight -- a simple cut-n-paste across xmap
entries
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
It seems we prefer to kill a momentum that arises (and that somebody had
a hard time to start) by starting a debate on principles. Latest example
is the lenya forrest integration momentum (which should be the base for
DOCO). What happend to the Commit-then-review method
[CC'd to Forrest]
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
came across
http://freetts.sourceforge.net/
the first demo of cocoon that I ever did in public was a hello world
page in html, pdf, svg and voicexml, with the little merlin dude
speaking 'hello world' to the audience (got a standing ovation for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-572?page=comments#action_12322595 ]
Ross Gardler commented on FOR-572:
--
No idea if this is any use, just spotted a reference to it on Cocoon user list:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-662?page=all ]
Thorsten Scherler updated FOR-662:
--
Summary: content-source-xml-link contract breaks 'forrest site' (was:
forrest seed using views broken index.source.xml)
problem:
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 17:50 -0400, Tim Williams wrote:
A couple questions on this one...
o) export-link-vt.xml
- why is the filename xml instead of ft?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-devm=112129152002511w=2
export-link.vt.xml that is the same move like Ross *.source.xml.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-662?page=all ]
Thorsten Scherler closed FOR-662:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Team work fixed that bug :)
content-source-xml-link contract breaks 'forrest site'
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-662?page=all ]
Thorsten Scherler reopened FOR-662:
---
I reopened this bug as example on how to analyse and resolve issues.
content-source-xml-link contract breaks 'forrest site'
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-662?page=all ]
Thorsten Scherler resolved FOR-662:
---
Resolution: Fixed
...but the issue is resolved. Sorry for the spam. :(
content-source-xml-link contract breaks 'forrest site'
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-662?page=comments#action_12322601 ]
Tim Williams commented on FOR-662:
--
A small portion of this remains unfortunately. The current solution doesn't
work for the plugin docs. I think this source stuff needs some
I just noticed how we are doing the pluginDocs. Having an app-wide
reserved or special URI does not seem clean to me. My initial
reaction is that we should keep them to a very minimum for system
things that can be turned off (e.g. profiler.html) as opposed to
docs.
Is there a reason why we use
29 matches
Mail list logo
