RE: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source

2007-04-13 Thread Gav....
-Original Message- From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 13 April 2007 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source David Crossley wrote: David Crossley wrote: Brian M Dube wrote: The same steps produce

Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source

2007-04-13 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: Brian M Dube wrote: The same steps produce the same error on Linux. However, it appears the scope is not limited to the dispatcher. Any plugin that provides Java source will fail. Plugins in trunk are built in $FOO_PLUGIN/build, where the compiled code will end up. This

Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source

2007-04-13 Thread Ross Gardler
Gav wrote: -Original Message- From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 13 April 2007 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source David Crossley wrote: David Crossley wrote: Brian M Dube wrote: The same steps produce

Whiteboard plugins (Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source)

2007-04-13 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: There are various other such plugins, but no developer is asking for them to be deployed. The trouble is that if we don't deploy these, then people will get strange errors when they try and we will need to answer lots of mail lists questions. I know that there are warnings

Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source

2007-04-13 Thread David Crossley
Gav wrote: Yep, Dispatcher does a forrest run and forrest ok for me too in trunk. I still get my ant test fail however. I tried to ant test the glossary plugin in trunk and that fails too, missing a todo.xml file. I am using forests own packaged Ant. This is the same as issue

Re: Whiteboard plugins (Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source)

2007-04-13 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: David Crossley wrote: There are various other such plugins, but no developer is asking for them to be deployed. The trouble is that if we don't deploy these, then people will get strange errors when they try and we will need to answer lots of mail lists questions. I know

Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source

2007-04-13 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: David Crossley wrote: David Crossley wrote: David Crossley wrote: Perhaps the Ant target deploy target, that makes the plugin available for download, does not pack the built jar into the zip file. Thanks again for your valuable input.

RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source (Re: RC1 Fails on dispatcher)

2007-04-12 Thread Brian M Dube
Ross Gardler wrote: Gav wrote: -Original Message- From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 April 2007 6:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RC1 Fails on dispatcher (Re: calling all developers, test release candidate) Ross Gardler wrote: Olivier Parent

Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source

2007-04-12 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: Brian M Dube wrote: The same steps produce the same error on Linux. However, it appears the scope is not limited to the dispatcher. Any plugin that provides Java source will fail. Plugins in trunk are built in $FOO_PLUGIN/build, where the compiled code will end

Re: RC1 fails when plugins provide Java source

2007-04-12 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: David Crossley wrote: Brian M Dube wrote: The same steps produce the same error on Linux. However, it appears the scope is not limited to the dispatcher. Any plugin that provides Java source will fail. Plugins in trunk are built in $FOO_PLUGIN/build, where