Diwaker Gupta wrote:
Its still very much under development and needs a lot of polishing
still. So I'll appreciate any comments and feedback :)
Nominated for the understatement of the year :-)
This skin is a really nice piece of design work and a great addition
to what we can offer our
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
Hmm. Sounds ok, except I haven't got a name for my skin as of now :(
Creative minds please come forth. I'm inclined to call it
minimalistic :D
How about 'no-nonsense'
--
Ferdinand Soethe
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
[views] Survival guide and setup
Let me know whether you have problems. After the setup steps you should
see the design because it is now the default.
Thanks, will try that today.
--
Ferdinand Soethe
Hi everyone,
I'm working on a new skin using views/viewHelper. Its nothing
fantastic. Just has the following goals:
o minimalistic, yet functional view
o use as few images as possible (read none, apart from the txt/pdf icons)
o render reliably across majority of browsers.
You can check it out
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 12:10 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on a new skin using views/viewHelper. Its nothing
fantastic. Just has the following goals:
o minimalistic, yet functional view
o use as few images as possible (read none, apart from the txt/pdf icons)
o
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
I like it. Actually since we dropped the css support on a contract base
we need a default.css for the viewHelper.xhtml. That is the only reason
why I have not deleted the css stuff out of the contracts.
Something with the above mentioned goals would work great for us
I *really* like it. Especially if it is using views. Fantastic!
Thanks :)
Some observations:
http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker/articles/index.html The first bullet in
the lists (not the TOC) have a blank line.
http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker/articles/why-forrest.html (and many
other
I am +1 to use your skin as dev version for views this will allow to
concentrate on the contracts and not the css.
Can we use yours? Then I do not have to worry anymore about tweaking the
scale-dev and finally got rid of the css-overhead.
Sure!
For submitting a skin with view/viewHelper
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 15:10 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
I am +1 to use your skin as dev version for views this will allow to
concentrate on the contracts and not the css.
Can we use yours? Then I do not have to worry anymore about tweaking the
scale-dev and finally got rid of the
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
Some observations:
http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker/articles/index.html The first bullet in
the lists (not the TOC) have a blank line.
http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker/articles/why-forrest.html (and many
other pages) there is a change in font towards the end of Take One.
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 15:10 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
I reckon a new element in the forrest.properties would be the best. e.g.
view.xhmtl.skin.name=minimalistic
or
view.xhmtl.skin.name=scale
As long as it is not added to the default properties, that would serve
to
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 23:01 +0100, Shaun Evans wrote:
I like it too, and I'm glad to see that there is some progress that is
visible to end users! I would like to continue to maintain scale-dev but
I have ran into problems with view/viewHelper, namely the lack of a
getting started guide.
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 16:19 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
Actually something is terribly wrong with the recent versions of
Firefox. They don't render the skin correctly. I have validated the
XHTML on validator.w3.org and apart from the namespace issue, the skin
validates *perfectly*.
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 00:10 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 15:10 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
I reckon a new element in the forrest.properties would be the best. e.g.
view.xhmtl.skin.name=minimalistic
or
view.xhmtl.skin.name=scale
As long as
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 02:40 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
I hope I fixed it in trunk (e.g. txt-link.ft):
I just committed.
hopes that is better now. ;-)
salu2
--
thorsten
Together we stand, divided we fall!
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 16:19 -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
Actually something is terribly wrong with the recent versions of
Firefox. They don't render the skin correctly. I have validated the
XHTML on validator.w3.org and apart from the namespace issue, the skin
validates *perfectly*.
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 21:55 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on a new skin using views/viewHelper. Its nothing
fantastic. Just has the following goals:
o minimalistic, yet functional view
o use as few images as possible (read none, apart
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 03:43 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 21:55 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on a new skin using views/viewHelper. Its nothing
fantastic. Just has the following goals:
o minimalistic, yet
Wow, too many mails in a flurry! :)
I can't reply to all of them, but let me just say 'perfecto! muy bien
señor!!' :)
This thread has become quite long, I think I'll start a new one for
the rest of my mail.
I recommend you to make an update of your production site. ;-)
Done!
--
Diwaker
19 matches
Mail list logo
