Summarising ...
http://f.a.o/docs_0_60/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.6
http://f.a.o/docs_0_70/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.7
http://f.a.o/docs_0_80/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.8
There will no longer be the current version at f.a.o/docs/
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Author: cheche
Date: Wed Jun 15 12:53:39 2005
New Revision: 190796
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=190796view=rev
Log:
Add a config selector so the i18n transformer only works whrn i18n is true
We are in a code freeze. This looks like a
Monday, June 13, 2005, 5:33:36 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Ron Blaschke wrote:
Sunday, June 12, 2005, 11:38:26 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Ron Blaschke wrote:
I am wondering if I made a mistake, and the URL should refer to the
directory only, like the others do, i.e.
Ross Gardler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: cheche
Date: Wed Jun 15 12:53:39 2005
New Revision: 190796
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=190796view=rev
Log:
Add a config selector so the i18n transformer only works whrn i18n is
true
We are in a code freeze. This looks like a
I haven't had time to dig into this in detail, but I hope someone
familiar with plugins will help me fill in the missing pieces.
I tried to build some site with the new 0.7rc1, which contains
simplified docbook documents. The site built successfully, but the
pages were empty (shouldn't this
Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
What are the issues that make fixing FOR 363 so difficult that it
appears not be slated for fixing in the 0.7 release?
Thanks,
Dick Hollenbeck
I personally think that this was not been review properly. yesterday I
had moved all the issues with no components so they
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-363?page=all ]
Juan Jose Pablos updated FOR-363:
-
Attachment: for-363.patch
Patch to allow other to review in a standard way.
figure-elements within aggregated pdf-pages are not displayed
Ron Blaschke wrote:
My current guess is that the name simplified-docbook collides with
the versioned plugins naming, so that docbook is interpreted as a
version number, and there is no plugin simplified.
That is correct. In fact I added a warning to the docs saying plugin
names cannot have a
Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: cheche
Date: Wed Jun 15 12:53:39 2005
New Revision: 190796
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=190796view=rev
Log:
Add a config selector so the i18n transformer only works whrn i18n is
true
We are in a code
Ross Gardler wrote:
Ron Blaschke wrote:
My current guess is that the name simplified-docbook collides with
the versioned plugins naming, so that docbook is interpreted as a
version number, and there is no plugin simplified.
That is correct. In fact I added a warning to the docs saying
Ross Gardler wrote:
Ron Blaschke wrote:
My current guess is that the name simplified-docbook collides with
the versioned plugins naming, so that docbook is interpreted as a
version number, and there is no plugin simplified.
That is correct. In fact I added a warning to the docs saying
Thread moved to dev list, please direct replies there.
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Roland Becker wrote:
system: w2ksp4
java: jdk1.5.0_03
1. download 0.7rc1
2. unpack
3. set environment
4. cd mysite
5. forrest seed
6. forrest
X [0]
Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Ron Blaschke wrote:
My current guess is that the name simplified-docbook collides with
the versioned plugins naming, so that docbook is interpreted as a
version number, and there is no plugin simplified.
That is correct. In fact I added a
Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
What are the issues that make fixing FOR 363 so difficult that it
appears not be slated for fixing in the 0.7 release?
Thanks,
Dick Hollenbeck
I personally think that this was not been review properly. yesterday I
had moved all the issues
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Next important milestones are:
* Create release candidate #2 if there have been changes
on Friday 2005-06-17 at 22:00 UTC [2]
[2]
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?day=18month=06year=2005p1=48p2=176p3=240p4=224p5=213
With
Ross Gardler wrote:
There is a typo in the patch:
match=section/document//figure[starts-with(@src,
'my-images')]|img[starts-with(@src, 'my-images')]
.
/|\
|
fixed thanks!
I've not tested the solution, but it looks sensible.
if no one has other
Ross Gardler wrote:
Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Ron Blaschke wrote:
My current guess is that the name simplified-docbook collides with
the versioned plugins naming, so that docbook is interpreted as a
version number, and there is no plugin simplified.
That is correct.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-363?page=all ]
Juan Jose Pablos updated FOR-363:
-
Attachment: for-363.patch
added proper patch.
figure-elements within aggregated pdf-pages are not displayed
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
plugin name=org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.view
type=internal
author=Apache Forrest Project
-
website=http://forrest.apache.org/docs/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.view;
+
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-363?page=comments#action_12313841 ]
Dick Hollenbeck commented on FOR-363:
-
I applied the Jun/05 5:03 PM patch to current 0.7 (snap shotted via svn update
as of yesterday), and it does not seem to fix this
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-545?page=comments#action_12313880 ]
David Crossley commented on FOR-545:
The six documents are generated twice (for docs_0_70 and docs_0_60) so that is
12 extra minutes on the build time. I will move these
On 6/16/05, Tim Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tested the RC1 and found no major issues. Some trivial things I saw were:
-- Tab not highlighting
I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bug but I found it odd that
clicking on the Versioned Docs tab doesn't highlight that tab --
meaning
Tim Williams wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
I've tested the RC1 and found no major issues. Some trivial things I saw
were:
-- Tab not highlighting
I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bug but I found it odd that
clicking on the Versioned Docs tab doesn't highlight that tab --
meaning
Tim Williams wrote:
I've tested the RC1 and found no major issues. Some trivial things I saw were:
-- Tab not highlighting
I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bug but I found it odd that
clicking on the Versioned Docs tab doesn't highlight that tab --
meaning you click on it and
If ever you wonder that ASF services might not be responding,
then browse to http://www.apache.org/dev/ and see the link
Public Host Service Status. This is particularly useful
if ever the mail servers are in trouble.
The ASF infrastructure@ people know about any issues, through
alerts to IRC,
25 matches
Mail list logo
