le 02/05/2006 18:53 Ross Gardler a écrit :
David Crossley wrote:
I reckon that we should remove the old 0.60 docs from
site-author.
...
We should also delete them from the forrest website.
...
What do others think?
+1
Users of 0.6 have the docs in their local copies if they need
le 02/05/2006 12:41 Thorsten Scherler a écrit :
El mar, 02-05-2006 a las 09:20 +0200, Cyriaque Dupoirieux escribió:
le 29/04/2006 00:25 Ross Gardler a écrit :
Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
le 21/04/2006 20:44 Thorsten Scherler a écrit :
[SNIP]
To easier recall
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-850?page=all ]
David Crossley closed FOR-850:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Upgraded example config in forrest.properties file.
upgrade photoGallery plugin to use current Dispatcher
David Crossley wrote:
The proposal addresses two separate issues:
A) Remove each mention of Active from guidelines.html
So this will mean that the people who have binding votes
are PMC Members.
Also change the definitions of Unanimous consensus and
2/3
David Crossley wrote:
Please vote on these two proposals:
A) Remove each mention of Active from guidelines.html
+1
B) Remove the separation of active committers from who.html
+1
-David
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Please vote on these two proposals:
A) Remove each mention of Active from guidelines.html
+1
B) Remove the separation of active committers from who.html
+1
Ross
Gav wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 3:47 AM
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: status of skins and dispatcher for 0.8 release
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
Are the broken links in the issue I reported [1]
le 03/05/2006 10:45 Ross Gardler a écrit :
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Please vote on these two proposals:
A) Remove each mention of Active from guidelines.html
+1
+1
B) Remove the separation of active committers from who.html
+1
+1,
Cyriaque,
Ross
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project forrest has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1
Gump wrote:
To whom it may engage...
...
The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were
provided:
-INFO- Failed with reason configuration failed
-ERROR- Bad Dependency. Project: cocoon unknown to *this* workspace
-INFO- Failed to extract fallback artifacts
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project forrest-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 5/3/06, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
The proposal addresses two separate issues:
A) Remove each mention of Active from guidelines.html
So this will mean that the people who have binding votes
are PMC Members.
Also change the
Please vote on these two proposals:
A) Remove each mention of Active from guidelines.html
+1
B) Remove the separation of active committers from who.html
+1
--
Ferdinand Soethe
The following borrows quite heavily from an earlier proposal called
[Proposal] Development process and a stable trunk. I hope I can put
this across more clearly this time.
I'll try to make it short :-)
Different Approaches to Development
---
There are two major
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project forrest has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project forrest-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
The following borrows quite heavily from an earlier proposal called
[Proposal] Development process and a stable trunk. I hope I can put
this across more clearly this time.
I'll try to make it short :-)
Different Approaches to Development
[I'm sipping an excellent yeast brandy while typing this so please
excuse if not everything makes perfect sense :-)]
Ross Gardler wrote:
In open source projects there is a fourth type of user. This one sits
somewhere between your type 1 and type 2, lets call them type one and a
half.
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Ferdinand Soethe escribi??:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Ferdinand Soethe escribi??:
Unfortunately this is not working properly (with the linkrewriter-part
throwing an error in some pages) while it does work when I insert the
same block into the system
19 matches
Mail list logo
