Re: [RT] Serving Apache Forrest site from live Forrest

2005-05-03 Thread Johannes Schaefer
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: One thing I like about Forrest is that it's not only a static site generation engine, but it's capable of serving the site live. Changes are instantaneous, bandwith is perserved, and dynamic content can be employed. IMHO every Apache project that produces something

[JIRA] Created: (FOR-490) serve multiple sites on a single Forrest instance

2005-05-03 Thread issues
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-490 Here is an overview of the issue: -

Re: Why are navigational element are not static when scrolling long pages?

2005-05-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: My point: Making use of the only purpose we came up with for the current mechanism (being able to have menus longer than the page) will create an extremely user-unfriedly page because opening a menu item at the bottom of such a menu - requires the user to scroll the page

Re: Inkonsistency in implementation of default file and site.xml and what to do about it

2005-05-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Sorry, this needs to be long (and dirty) in a freshly seeded site change site.xml to site label=Demo Site xmlns=http://apache.org/forrest/linkmap/1.0; tab= menu1 label=Menu 1 page1 label=Page 1 href=page1.html/ page2 label=Page 2 href=page2.html/ /menu1 /site

Re: loggin error in last part of static site generation

2005-05-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: in a freshly seeded site?! * [68/1][0/0] 0.281s 22.6Kb samples/linking.pdf * [69/0][0/0] 0.1s 3.2Kb samples/index.pdf Logging Error: Writing event to closed stream. Total time: 0 minutes 24 seconds, Site size: 403.728 Site pages: 59

Re: Is OOo license compatible with ASL?

2005-05-03 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: Ross, would you please take this up on [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the first time that i have heard discussion of this SISSL license. Sure, I'll report back when we have an answer. In the meantime, if anyone is interested in the (alpha) MSOffice plugin I can make it available

Re: Where to change comments to configuration files

2005-05-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: RG Best to change it in all occurances of the file as people could look at RG any of the official Apache docs for guidance. Added info to files in fresh-site and site author. I'd rather not do this in the future but instead prefer for us to agree that we

Re: Why are navigational element are not static when scrolling long pages?

2005-05-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: My point: Making use of the only purpose we came up with for the current mechanism (being able to have menus longer than the page) will create an extremely user-unfriedly page because opening a menu item at the bottom of such a menu - requires the user to scroll the page

Re: Does Forrest delete build/site before adding new files?

2005-05-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: After doing some radical changes in xdocs I noticed that there was still an old index.html in build/site that was not updated because it was no longer part of the site. It should definitely have been removed. It doesn't by default for performance reasons. During development

Re: Why are navigational element are not static when scrolling long pages?

2005-05-03 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Ross Gardler wrote: RG I'd suggest finding the solution, adding it as a configuration option RG and then, if you still want to, take it to a vote to make it the default. Sounds good to me since such a change would only make sense if we get it to work properly. Implementing it as an option

Comment on index.html (Re: Where to change comments to configuration files)

2005-05-03 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Ross Gardler wrote: (about this comment FS !-- Note: No matter what you configure here, Forrest will always try to load FSindex.html when you request http://yourHost/ FS -- ) RG I'm -1 on the current comment as it gives the impression that it *can't* RG be changed. This is bad. If

Re: loggin error in last part of static site generation

2005-05-03 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Ross Gardler wrote: RG http://issues.cocoondev.org/browse/FOR-465 Ooops. Sorry. Time to start reading issues again ... -- Ferdinand Soethe

[JIRA] Commented: (FOR-490) serve multiple sites on a single Forrest instance

2005-05-03 Thread issues
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Johannes Schaefer Created: Tue, 3 May 2005 3:28 AM Body: Here's the link to the Mail: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-devm=111510406905741w=2 -

Re: Daisy plugin

2005-05-03 Thread Steven Noels
On 26 Apr 2005, at 23:29, Ross Gardler wrote: The big advantage of Daisy over other CMS systems is that it compeltely separates the front end from the repository. The access control is done in the repository. However at present, for simplicity, the plugin uses the daisy-wiki interface to

Re: Comment on index.html (Re: Where to change comments to configuration files)

2005-05-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: (about this comment FS !-- Note: No matter what you configure here, Forrest will always try to load FSindex.html when you request http://yourHost/ FS -- ) RG I'm -1 on the current comment as it gives the impression that it *can't* RG be

Re: Does Forrest delete build/site before adding new files?

2005-05-03 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Ross Gardler wrote: RG It doesn't by default for performance reasons. During development it is RG usually not important if the odd file is left hanging and cleaning a RG directory with a few thousand files in it can take quite some time. RG If you want to do a clean build then do 'forrest

Re: Comment on index.html (Re: Where to change comments to configuration files)

2005-05-03 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Ross Gardler wrote: RG But that simply is not correct. It *is* configurable as I have written RG on a number of occasions now. Sorry, I shouldn't respond to messages one by one. That way I missed your solution in 'Re: Inkonsistency in implementation of default file and site.xml and what to do

Re: Comment on index.html (Re: Where to change comments to configuration files)

2005-05-03 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:49 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: Ferdinand Soethe wrote: ... I disagree here. It might have been ok to just leave it before we knew about the inconsistencies it will create if you don't use index.html. As far as I am aware the only inconsistency is that the index

[HEADSUP] viewHelper is now viewHelper.xhtml

2005-05-03 Thread Thorsten Scherler
Hello devs, I am implementing another format for the viewHelper. That forced me to rename the current implementation to viewHelper.xhtml. *You have to* rename the forrest.properties of your projects that are using the view/viewHelper!!! BTW we need to discuss the contracts that we have right

Re: svn commit: r167890 - /forrest/trunk/site-author/content/xdocs/docs/faq.xml

2005-05-03 Thread Ross Gardler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +faq id=defaultFileName + question How can I change the default file name that Forrest will look for when I request a +URL like codehttp://myserver/code or codehttp://myserver/mydir//code? /question + answer +pChange the setting

Re: Comment on index.html (Re: Where to change comments to configuration files)

2005-05-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: RG But that simply is not correct. It *is* configurable as I have written RG on a number of occasions now. Sorry, I shouldn't respond to messages one by one. That way I missed your solution in 'Re: Inkonsistency in implementation of default file and

Re: [HEADSUP] viewHelper is now viewHelper.xhtml

2005-05-03 Thread Diwaker Gupta
Hi Thorsten, What are the main differences between this and the earlier implementations? Thanks, Diwaker On 5/3/05, Thorsten Scherler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello devs, I am implementing another format for the viewHelper. That forced me to rename the current implementation to

Reverting changes

2005-05-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Recently I asked how I should revert a change in SVN, but no-one here was sure how to do it smoothly. I promised to ask on a more appropriate list, however, this recently appeared on the cocoon dev list: Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi: I want revert changes in

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project forrest-forrestbar (in module forrest) failed

2005-05-03 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project forrest-forrestbar has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue