Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages

2010-08-31 Thread Gunnar Thielebein
Hi, Regarding enhancements I stumbled about an issue I noted some time ago with ignore list behavior. When new filter rules are applied to (or remove from) ignore list you still need to add/unversion appropriate files manually. How hard would it be to implement some enhancement to run

Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages

2010-08-31 Thread P.Marek
Hello Gunnar! Regarding enhancements I stumbled about an issue I noted some time ago with ignore list behavior. When new filter rules are applied to (or remove from) ignore list you still need to add/unversion appropriate files manually. Well, it's the behaviour of subversion and git (and,

Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages

2010-08-31 Thread Gunnar Thielebein
On 31/08/10 15:45, Philipp Marek wrote: Hello Gunnar! Regarding enhancements I stumbled about an issue I noted some time ago with ignore list behavior. When new filter rules are applied to (or remove from) ignore list you still need to add/unversion appropriate files manually. Well, it's

Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages

2010-08-31 Thread P.Marek
Hello Gunnar! But the work begins if files needs to be sorted out because of privacy or bloating the repo etc. I think fsvs behavior can, because of its clueness and different use case, be different in that area. Comparing to svn the fsvs ignore list is also more centric then some sporadic

Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages

2010-08-31 Thread Gunnar Thielebein
On 31/08/10 17:10, P.Marek wrote: Hello Gunnar! But the work begins if files needs to be sorted out because of privacy or bloating the repo etc. I think fsvs behavior can, because of its clueness and different use case, be different in that area. Comparing to svn the fsvs ignore list is