Thanks for your time,
Jules
--
/*
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
* http://www.coredevelopers.net
*/
,
John
--
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jules Gosnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get a feel for how EJB/JNDI clustering will be
implemented
in Geronimo and when it might be implemented.
I remember reading somewhere
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open
side of things - specifically
satisfying dependencies using the beans that are deployed in Geronimo.
Regards,
Rob
Jules Gosnell wrote:
I have just checked in the beginnings of a SpringDeployer (revision
128446).
This requires an updated version of Spring (1.1.3). So, if you tend to
run your
wrist ? :-)
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Rob,
You'll need to refresh your view - I have made a few changes,
including quickly hacked up support for one-level of nested packed jars:
foo.spr/
META-INF/spring.xml
foo/Foo.class
bar.jar
bar/Bar.class
...
This is useful as you can just
it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
to access shared services - or at least
this is my vision.
Rob
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
I think that the integration is really one of contained components,
not the containers themselves. This means that things in the Spring
world need to see things in the J2EE world in Spring
- at least Rob
can get on with his stuff in the meantime ...
Jules
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
with Spring applications natively without needing
all that elephantine J2EE baggage :-)
--
Jeremy
David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 28, 2005, at 3:39 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
From the source:
// I know that this should not be here (in the j2ee package) but,
// until someone who knows
it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
. I will investigate
this more today.
Happy hacking ;-)
Jules
Rob
Jules Gosnell wrote:
I've taken all of the points raised on board and just checked in the
second cut, which splits Spring support into runtime and deploy time
components.
I'm still having trouble getting the Builder spotted
:-)
I am just putting in a placeholder POJOGBean that wraps each POJO, but
the API is simply that of GBean (i.e. has one accessor getPeer()) at the
moment - I have to look into how we can dynamically declare an
interface's metadata to the kernel...
Jules
Rob
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Rob Harrop wrote
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Rob Harrop wrote:
Jules,
The Spring config file does not change when new modules are added, it
is generic enough to support most configuration options. For JMX
metadata we currently use interfaces or source level metadata
(Commons Attributes or Annotations). I am working
David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 2, 2005, at 7:54 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Rob Harrop wrote:
Jules,
The Spring config file does not change when new modules are added,
it is generic enough to support most configuration options. For JMX
metadata we currently use interfaces or source
Jules Gosnell wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 2, 2005, at 7:54 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Rob Harrop wrote:
Jules,
The Spring config file does not change when new modules are added,
it is generic enough to support most configuration options. For
JMX metadata we currently use
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 2, 2005, at 7:54 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Rob Harrop wrote:
Jules,
The Spring config file does not change when new modules are added,
it is generic enough to support most configuration options. For JMX
metadata we currently use interfaces
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
I would like to change the kernel - I don't think there is much value
in Spring support if the first thing we do is to start eroding its
feature set.
Please not at this time - IMHO changes to the kernel now would pose
too much risk to the rest
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
I would like to change the kernel - I don't think there is much
value in Spring support if the first thing we do is to start eroding
its feature set.
Please not at this time - IMHO changes to the kernel now would pose
too much risk
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open
and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
because the
doc at http://cglib.sourceforge.net/apidocs is out of date...
I'll hold off on messing around with this for a while...
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote:
stuff deleted
The plan for integrating component frameworks such as spring is to
write a GBean component that holds the spring object
it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
integration will just have to wait its turn.
Jules
-dain
On Feb 8, 2005, at 1:55 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
So, Guys,
I've given you a few days to look over the minimal kernel patch.
As I understood it we left the thread with two real options :
1) extend the kernel to allow acceptance of an existing
and life-cycle. Anyway,
this is something I believe can wait.
-dain
On Feb 8, 2005, at 1:55 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
So, Guys,
I've given you a few days to look over the minimal kernel patch.
As I understood it we left the thread with two real options :
1) extend the kernel to allow acceptance
that this would involve.
Jules
--
Jeremy
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network
David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 8, 2005, at 4:06 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
I think Jules has a point on this. What about the use of other open
source projects that manage their own private mbean lifecycles, such
as Tomcat?
and not forgetting Jetty :-), which also exposes
are thinking of taking a completely
separate container and integrating it with geronimo. Both are
fighting over the lifecycle stuff: if we can figure that out then
exposing the running components as gbeans will be easy.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 8, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeremy Boynes
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
snip for the sake of clarity on the following points/
To what extent is it necessary for Spring to register the actual
POJOs at runtime? How much can be built before hand and be packaged
into a Geronimo Configuration?
Good question I guess it comes
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
The intent behind GBeans is that they are long running services -
for example, running for the lifetime of an application. Is that how
Spring would be using them or are you trying to create/delete
instances frequently (say on each web request)?
long
it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
Thanks Jeremy - much appreciated
Jules
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeremy,
I've been wondering whether I can do without upgrading cglib for the
whole of Geronimo, just doing it for the Spring module, since we use
it to build a standard 1.3 proxy. The problem is that this is done
and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
I waited a while to see if anyone else had a complete working
build/test cycle that they could drop cglib into - no-one has come back.
Perhaps, it's time to remind the steps to give it a shot ;) I remember
it wasn't clear if it's 2.0.2 or 2.1.0
, and
will keep posting as we add new functionality.
Cheers,
Jules
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core
it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
and am available. I think my only time
constraints are Friday afternoon and a Wednesday night session I'm
moderating at 1700.
excellent - I'll come back to the list as soon as I have a venue.
Jules
Cheers
Matt
Jules Gosnell wrote:
It looks like I am going to make it to Dublin afterall.
I
-
Hash: SHA1
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Matt - I don't think that the problem was with sponsorship, but rather
exclusion... (maybe I've misunderstood something?). Covalent are simply
providing a room and beer. The invitation is open to the entire
community and you will be driving the meeting
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Matt - I don't think that the problem was with sponsorship, but rather
exclusion... (maybe I've misunderstood something?). Covalent are simply
providing a room and beer. The invitation is open
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Matt - I don't think that the problem was with sponsorship, but rather
exclusion... (maybe I've misunderstood something?). Covalent are simply
providing a room and beer. The invitation is open
oops - just found this one in my wadi-dev folder...
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Jules,
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Jules its great you'll make it over here. I haven't really followed
clustering since it was withdrawn from the Incubator so my apologies
for not being current
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Are you going to provide a call in line so people not at the
conference can participate?
I'll look into it.
Would anyone be interested in using such a feature ?
Me depending when
Jeff Genender wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Are you going to provide a call in line so people not at the
conference can participate?
I'll look into it.
Would anyone be interested in using such a feature ?
I would likely be interested too depending on time.
OK
,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Cayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Are you going to provide a call
an hour
earlier, but then I will be sleepy.
-dain
On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Are you going to provide a call in line so people not at the
conference can participate?
I'll look into it.
Would anyone
be happy to try to set something up - Has
anyone run a skype conference with 4 or 5 participants before ? Would
you like us to try?
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I was planning on attending the CeltiXFire BOF at 2100 Dublin time.
2200 is good from my perspective
Here are the final details :
Thursday, 6:00pm, O'Connell Meeting Room, Suite 110
Room, Soda and coffee provided courtesy of Covalent.
See you there,
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote:
It looks like I am going to make it to Dublin afterall.
I think this will be a good chance for anyone
just to say that we have managed to sort out a phone conference setup -
thanks to Matt for this
check out the thread - Clustering BOF in Dublin, Meeting Logistics
see/hear you all there,
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Here are the final details :
Thursday, 6:00pm, O'Connell Meeting Room
Guys,
They are taking down the network here in the next 5 mins or so and I am
only half way through the write up - so I am going to ask you all to
bear with me until I get home tomorrow.
Sorry to keep you all waiting,
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote:
It looks like I am going to make
Here is the promised report on the Geronimo Clustering get-together
held on thursday (6:00pm-8:00pm) in Dublin:
Attendees:
In the room :
Aaron Mulder
Alan Cabrera
Filip Hanik
Greg Wilkins
Jan Bartel
Jeremy Boynes
Jules Gosnell
Mark Brewer
Matt Hogstrom
Paul Buck
Phil Robinson
Rainer Jung
of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
Greg Wilkins wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 7/12/06, Jules Gosnell
Greg Wilkins wrote:
However, in another sense, Jetty need not delegate this task, since the
object returned in these cases is managed by WADI, but created by a
Factory that is injected at startup
:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 7/12/06, Jules Gosnell
Greg Wilkins wrote:
However, in another sense, Jetty need not delegate this task, since the
object returned in these cases is managed by WADI, but created by a
Factory that is injected at startup time. This factory might
Jules Gosnell wrote:
I pressed 'send' without counting to 10 first on the last response. Sorry.
The thread seems to be getting nowhere fast - probably my fault - let me
try an alternate tack.
here is how I would like to see it work.
The Interception Contract :
The container provides
Greg Wilkins wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
I pressed 'send' without counting to 10 first on the last response. Sorry.
No probs - no offence taken.
I've obviously done a bad job of explaining myself so far. Is this
clearer ?
Actually no - I preferred the slightly pissed off version
call
unbind and bind during a replace.
cheers
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 4:09 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Sorry, was referring to this thread. Seems like it's winding down
and just looking for a clear idea of what the current thinking is.
Hi David - allow me to wind it up again :-)
I am
Hi Hiram :-)
Hiram Chirino wrote:
On 3/9/06, *Jules Gosnell* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3)
I think that you are completely omitting one of the key players from
this API. The Invocation. The goal of successful Session management is
that Invocation
it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:59 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Sorry, was referring to this thread. Seems like it's winding down
and just looking for a clear idea of what the current thinking is.
David,
since you are here - a few SFSB questions...
what
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 6:54 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:59 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Is it possible for one client to pass the handle of an SFSB to
another ? Does the spec touch on this ? Does it ever happen ?
I know that per spec, the client identity
David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 14, 2006, at 12:55 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:59 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Sorry, was referring to this thread. Seems like it's winding
down and just looking for a clear idea of what
decided yet on exactly how I want to implement this in WADI
Jules
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open
over there re:
session management.
I look forward to seeing you over there,
Jules
Filip
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
gentlemen, not a committer here, but wanted to share some thoughts.
in my opinion, the Session API should not have to know about
clustering
it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
of thing that I am looking for,
thanks,
Jules
On 5/3/06, Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to kick off a thread about the monitoring of clustered
deployments...
There is a section in the 1,000ft Clustering Overview
(http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO
David Blevins wrote:
On May 3, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
I'd like to kick off a thread about the monitoring of clustered
deployments...
There is a section in the 1,000ft Clustering Overview (http://
opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/
Clustering
David Blevins wrote:
On May 4, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
On May 3, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
I'd like to kick off a thread about the monitoring of clustered
deployments...
There is a section in the 1,000ft Clustering Overview (http
:)
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers
-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe
,
so
feel free to jump in on this.
Jeff
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core
operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
Guys,
Interest in clustering seems to be growing rapidly, along with
requirements from various areas. I thought it would be useful to get
everyone with an interest together in one place to answer peoples'
questions about Geronimo clustering status and to canvas you all for
expectations,
,
Jules
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Jules Gosnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 8:35 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: ApacheCon Geronimo Clustering Huddle: 10:00am Wednesday,
Hackathon Area.
Guys,
Interest in clustering
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 11:53, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Jules,
Sorry for the late reply and thanks for all the info!!! It's awesome.
I have more questions if you don't mind. Not very organized so bear
with me :(
no problem.
Answers are greatly
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 11:53, Jules Gosnell wrote:
, whether there is other suitable Geronimo or ASF-licensed code
available, or whether we will need to write our own WADI-
autodiscovery classes
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 11:53, Jules Gosnell wrote:
, whether there is other suitable Geronimo or ASF-licensed
code available
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 17:25, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 11:53, Jules Gosnell wrote
it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
to
be roughly the same and include the element in geronimo-web-1.0.xsd?
I think some form of adjustment here will be the sensible way forward.
Thanks for the pointers,
Jules
hope this helps
david jencks
On Jan 4, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Aaron, David, or anyone in the know
clustering configs to be
roughly the same and include the element in geronimo-web-1.0.xsd?
hope this helps
david jencks
On Jan 4, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Aaron, David, or anyone in the know :-)
Maybe you can help me with this:
I have a WADI demo webapp.
To get it running
via this mechanism
(I'm not sure whether the standalone mechanism for session manager
selection has been exposed for TC or not).
Thoughts ?
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Well... is it possible to make this not specific to WADI? Perhaps
make it a generic clustering
server-wide resources ?
Jules
--
Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe
on with.
Jules
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
On 1/5/06, *Rajith Attapattu* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jules Gosnell [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:55 AM
To: [EMAIL
discussions on the list to flesh out
the relevant areas. I'm not sure of the best way of making this document
available so that everyone can contribute - but we can worry about that
when we have one.
Do you have a pet clustering area ? Have we discussed it ?
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote
Jeff Genender wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Guys,
are we not going back around the per-app/per-container argument here ?
You need to support both per container and per app. Thats the way the
Tomcat clustering works today and it allows for the most flexible
ability to choose what
Jeff Genender wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Guys,
are we not going back around the per-app/per-container argument here ?
You need to support both per container and per app. Thats the way the
Tomcat clustering works today and it allows for the most flexible
ability to choose what
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Jules, I think you are spot on with a summary at this point. At
least in my conversations a person's view of clustering is influenced
by which aspect of clustering they are intersted in. I think a short
doc would be really helpful here. Were you
of external and incubated projects.
Which areas interest you the most - web, ejb, jndi, deployment,
management/monitoring, pojo... ?
Let us know and I will hook you up :-)
Jules
Cheers,
-Ryan
On 1/12/06, *Jules Gosnell* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jules Gosnell
organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
.
regards,
Jules
Jeff
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Here is a list of outstanding issues associated with this work:
- ActiveMQ's shutdown hook seems to trigger when Geronimo is shutdown,
removing AMQ before WADI - WADI doesn't like this. I have added a
property to the node.sh script which
for implementation. I would appreciate that you please
involve the Apache way and open discussions on the lists before doing
this sort of thing in the future.
Again, I will CC the G lists to make this clear, that I would like this
change backed out.
Jeff
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Here is a list
see inline - I ommitted one further technical benefit of my approach:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Hi Jules.
A few comments. First, you made changes without discussing them on the
dev lists.
There has been lots of discussion over the past week or two on both
geronimo-dev
solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it.
/**
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
*www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training Support.
**/
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
