Re: Updated GORA-174 HBase information - unions

2013-02-15 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
Hi Renato On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:10 PM, dev-digest-h...@gora.apache.org wrote: This is a part I am not understanding very well. You guys are saying that legacy data is a problem, but why is this a problem if we haven't been supporting Avro Union in the past? This is a new feature, not an

Re: Updated GORA-174 HBase information - unions

2013-02-12 Thread Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo
Hi, 2013/2/10 Alfonso Nishikawa alfonso.nishik...@gmail.com: Hi Renato, So what you are proposing is to store and extra index at the beginning of the actual value? or does HBase do this automatically? What about if bytes were being written? couldn't some type of corruption happen and make

Re: Updated GORA-174 HBase information - unions

2013-02-10 Thread Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo
Hi Alfonso, 2013/2/7 Alfonso Nishikawa alfonso.nishik...@gmail.com: Hi all, I updated GORA-174 issue info about HBase backend at [0]. Any thoughts? So what you are proposing is to store and extra index at the beginning of the actual value? or does HBase do this automatically? What about if

Re: Updated GORA-174 HBase information - unions

2013-02-10 Thread Alfonso Nishikawa
Hi Renato, So what you are proposing is to store and extra index at the beginning of the actual value? or does HBase do this automatically? What about if bytes were being written? couldn't some type of corruption happen and make this unusable? The extra byte at the beginning of the actual

Updated GORA-174 HBase information - unions

2013-02-07 Thread Alfonso Nishikawa
Hi all, I updated GORA-174 issue info about HBase backend at [0]. Any thoughts? I think now is better expressed. If no one think is wrong, I will implement solution-1 and solution-2(this means maybe quite work, so do we maintain it? -I vote yes). I had to restore my git server, but in this case