Re: Apache Gora March board report (draft)

2012-03-07 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
OK so Board report is submitted and Committed @ revision 33866. I think we should progress with replacing offending method's/code in SqlStore with TODO's. This will mean that we can spin a 0.2 RC and put it to bed. Development can continue towards 0.3 with a gora-sql re-write, then addition of

Re: Apache Gora March board report (draft)

2012-03-06 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
+1 from me, Lewis, Looks awesome. RE: gora-sql: what are the next steps there? Is it something the legal committee can help out with? At worst, I'd imagine, we could move gora-sql to a non-released area of SVN and then push forward with an 0.2 that doesn't include it? Cheers, Chris On Mar 6,

Re: Apache Gora March board report (draft)

2012-03-06 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
Hi Chris, We'll in all honesty, I think it's best for me to provide a brief summary. We need to remove our dependency upon and use of the healthmarketscience sqlbuilder libary. Used very little in SqlStore class [0]. The problem I ran into when looking into this was that unfortunately JOOQ

Re: Apache Gora March board report (draft)

2012-03-06 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hey Lewis, Gotcha, no problem. One option is simply to remove the sqlbuilder library and to replace SqlStore with stubbed out methods that throw Exceptions and that simply don't work. Then we ship Gora 0.2, with a note saying don't use SqlStore. Then if folks complain and want to use it, we ask