IfModule mod_ssl.c
Include conf/httpd-ssl.conf
/IfModule
Bill
Definitely +1 on the above.
- Original Message -
From: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:56 PM
Subject: RE: SSL configuration
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Better yet...
DirectoryIndex index.html
index.html.cgi
index.html.ssi
where cgi is set via AddHandler, ssi is set via AddFilter.
That is a really good demonstration. Neither .cgi nor .ssi offers any
hint to mod_negotiation of what it aught to do.
From: Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:44 AM
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Better yet...
DirectoryIndex index.html
index.html.cgi
index.html.ssi
where cgi is set via AddHandler, ssi is set via AddFilter.
That is a really good
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:03 PM
This is looking more and more like config funkiness as opposed to a serious
code defect. Unless I see something to change my mind, I am not inclined to
attempt to fix this in the 1.3 code base.
Whatever. I
When I was fixing mod_usertrack in 2.0, I was referring back to the
1.3 behavior and discovered two bits;
1. we waste a ton of time expanding dates that don't need expanding
2. there is still the 'millenial hack' that should be unneccessary now
Any opinions on committing this patch for
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:01:54PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
IMHO, if we have unpredictable behavior due to directory -contents-,
then mod_negotiation is broken.
+1 (me too).
Although I have no clue what the proper solution to this, I'm kind
of sure that if we are choosing based off
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:07:46PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's bitten several folks. It's been written up on bugtraq as an outstanding
case. There are a dozen variations of cause and effect. But whatever, you are
the RM, and nobody can veto a release.
Pardon my ignorance, but
Hi,
Here's a sample version of httpd-ssl-std.conf that may be added into
the CVS tree. It'd be great if somebody could pl. review and commit it.
Thx
-Madhu
IfModule mod_ssl.c
Listen @@Port@@
Listen 443
AddType application/x-x509-ca-cert .crt
AddType application/x-pkcs7-crl.crl
#
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The directory CONTENTS cannot be construed as a config error.
If we can agree on some scheme to handle examples, such as the above,
then I could begin to have some confidence. If we can't -clearly-
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:15:36PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
-Original Message-
From: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Hi,
Here's a sample version of httpd-ssl-std.conf that may be added into
the CVS tree. It'd be great if somebody could pl. review and commit it.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Prefer html shtml php jsp cgi
In the words of many administrators, It shouldn't be this hard to
understand.
In the words of many developers, too. -- justin
Come on folks. Is this all really necessary?
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:04 PM
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:07:46PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's bitten several folks. It's been written up on bugtraq as an outstanding
case. There are a dozen variations of cause and effect.
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:02 PM
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:01:54PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
IMHO, if we have unpredictable behavior due to directory -contents-,
then mod_negotiation is broken.
+1 (me too).
Although I have
The web page Using Apache With Novell NetWare 5
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/netware.html) currently classifies Apache for NetWare as
experimental. With the release of NetWare 6, Apache 1.3 installs by default as part
of the NetWare 6 configuration environment. This underlines Novell's
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 09:20:41PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
We should fix the configure script so that it automatically adds the LoadModule
line, just like it did in 1.3.
This patch fixes the problem described in the STATUS file whereby modules
that are compiled-in by default would not be
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:20 PM
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:15:36PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
In my opinion, there is way too much text in here. Why don't we start by
creating a good set of docs for mod_ssl (currently there are none in the
If you will consider the language from README-WIN32.TXT;
Apache on Win32 should be considered initial-release quality code.
It has not been subjected to the same stresses on its stability and
security that the Unix releases have enjoyed, so there is a greater
possibility of undiscovered
Thanks for the review comments. I agree that the comments are a bit more for
a experienced user, and probably just right for a new-user. I can certainly
reduce the details, and point the user to the docs. for more information.
(Can we point them to the existing documentation at www.modssl.org
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but why can't someone veto a release if they feel
it is the wrong time to do so? -- justin
We have a mess of rules/traditions that act to prevent
obstructionism and push people toward constructive
argument and constructive actions. Releasing is
-Original Message-
From: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Thanks for the review comments. I agree that the comments are a
bit more for
a experienced user, and probably just right for a new-user. I can
certainly
reduce the details, and point the user to the docs. for more
when i tried ti compile the apache on sol 5.8
i386 i started with ./configure and found this error i tried to touch the
file name as he said but nothing happend i got the same message
any help?
"Creating MakefileCreating Configuration.apaci
in srcConfiguration.tmpl is more recent than
OK, I'm running into what seems to be a poorly documented quirk for
DocumentBuilder.
Using the document builder, I am parsing out and XML file, which is never
more than 1 element deep with attributes.
However, after I set all the attribute values, I need to create extra
elements and append them
with current cvs all httpd-test ssl tests hang, stacktrace is same for
all...
(gdb) where
#0 0x401c91de in __select () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40047ab0 in __DTOR_END__ () from /home/dougm/ap/prefork/lib/libapr.so.0
#2 0x40039fa4 in apr_recv (sock=0x827902c, buf=0x8284638 , len=0xbfffd1f4)
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:02:46AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:01:54PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
IMHO, if we have unpredictable behavior due to directory -contents-,
then mod_negotiation is broken.
There was nothing unpredictable about it before.
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:52:16PM +0200, Mohamed Aly wrote:
when i tried ti compile the apache on sol 5.8 i386 i started with ./configure and
found this error i tried to touch the file name as he said but nothing happend i got
the same message
any help?
Creating Makefile
Creating
This is one of those 'light bulb comes on' posts.
The mod_mime bug of not correctly handling unknown file name extensions essentially
renders all the negotiable variants equivalent! mod_negotiation does the right thing
and
serves up the smallest of the equivalent variants!
Bill
On Tue, Oct
From: Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:43 PM
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:02:46AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Although I have no clue what the proper solution to this, I'm kind
of sure that if we are choosing based off file size, that is wrong.
There
I've yanked the following two items from 1.3's STATUS. Both are now
incorporated in 2.0.
* Proposed API Changes:
- r-content_language is for backwards compatibility... with modules
that may not link any longer without some minor editing. The new
field is r-content_languages. Heck
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:08 PM
This is one of those 'light bulb comes on' posts.
The mod_mime bug of not correctly handling unknown file name extensions essentially
renders all the negotiable variants equivalent! mod_negotiation does the right
According to Rodrigo Parra Novo:
I'm sending the (rather simple) patch attached. It would be nice if
someone from the Apache team could take a look at the patch, and tell me
if anything is still missing. It would be also nice if (hopefully) this
patch could be added to the current
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 02:56 pm, Rodrigo Parra Novo wrote:
necessary steps to to port Apache to a new architecture. Is there a
document with the same function for Apache 2.0?
Not yet, but it looks like you have found them all already.
Through a bit of searching/grepping, I've found
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
Do you see the same error with worker mpm also ?.. Infact, I was debugging a
simular problem that I faced today morning when running stress (with worker
mpm).
i've only tested with prefork, but the problem doesn't look mpm
When Expat was added to Apache a couple years ago, part of the impetus was
to make XML parsing a standard feature for the web server -- modules could
count on it being present for their use.
So now the question arises, who is using the Expat that is included with
Apache 1.3? Was the goal of
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Mark J Cox wrote:
What we ought to do is to first decide what the XML output is going to
look like (it'll be a pain to change this later), then it doesn't really
matter if it's a patch to mod_status or a new module.
http://www.awe.com/mark/dev/mod_status_xml/example.xml
Boo,
First I'll twack myself for the fact that I didn't look at the openssl
version any sooner...
This is prolly at least one nice for the archives for other donkeys
hitting their heads against this brick...
I wanted a newer version than the 2.0.16 beta's to experiment some more
with Apache
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:51:09AM -0400, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
wrote:
I'm running into all sorts of filter problems. The initial client request is
itself not received completely.. For ex., the apr_bucket_read
(ssl_engine_io.c:218) returns 20 bytes when the client has sent
Hi Mark,
I wrote an example sometime in July/Aug but didn't get around to porting
it to 2.0. Here is what we have so far
http://www.awe.com/mark/dev/mod_status_xml/
I've tested your module on Linux, NetWare and Win32, and used Mozilla 0.9.4 to diplay,
here's what I get:
- on Linux and
37 matches
Mail list logo
