Re: Begging your pardons,

2001-12-30 Thread Randy Kobes
- Original Message - From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:55 PM Subject: Begging your pardons, but is anyone familiar with the following failure cases on win32? modules\access..FAILED tests 4, 20-21, 24, 26, 28,

Re: Begging your pardons,

2001-12-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Randy Kobes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 12:30 PM From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:55 PM but is anyone familiar with the following failure cases on win32? modules\access..FAILED tests 4, 20-21, 24, 26, 28,

Re: [PATCH] mod_proxy truncates status line

2001-12-30 Thread Graham Leggett
Adam Sussman wrote: Mod_proxy truncates the status line returned by the proxied server. One character gets snipped off of the end of the status line. Are you 100% sure the buffer is big enough to do this? If the buffer is of size len the zero will be written past the end of the buffer.

Re: Oh dear...

2001-12-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Try starting the server with another server already running on the same ports. It'll die saying no listening ports available, right? That's cool. useful even. What's not is what it says next. [Fri Dec 28 20:39:26 2001] [alert] no listening sockets

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/mappers mod_negotiation.c

2001-12-30 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Another side issue that I notice; we should _REALLY_ be presenting MULTIPLE CHOICES rather than serving the smallest file. The smallest file -hack- is exactly that, someone worthless for reasons debated on this list many times. If you are referring to the past

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/mappers mod_negotiation.c

2001-12-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 10:14 AM William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Another side issue that I notice; we should _REALLY_ be presenting MULTIPLE CHOICES rather than serving the smallest file. The smallest file -hack- is exactly that,

One more before .30?

2001-12-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
There are still issues with PATH_INFO/QUERY_STRING on redirected (multiviewed) ap_lookup_sub_req_dirent CGI's that I'd like to tackle. It may be an API change, so the sooner the better. The lookup file/dirent schema is really cool, except that it doesn't give us a graceful point to insert the

Logs and logs and logs [oh my!]

2001-12-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
I believe Daniel brought this up (or at least he pointed it out to me) that we go way overboard with logging directives; * Syntax: * *TransferLog fn Logs transfers to fn in standard log format, unless *a custom format is set with LogFormat *LogFormat

RE: Logs and logs and logs [oh my!]

2001-12-30 Thread Joshua Slive
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Isn't it time to drop TransferLog and CookieLog? +1 We can accomplish the same by allowing that LogFormat provides the default for the CustomLog directive, in the absense of an optional [format] arg. I haven't looked in detail, but

httpd.conf Qs

2001-12-30 Thread Dale Ghent
Hey, I have two questions here: 1) I'm working on making sure that directives in the Apache 1.3.x httpd.conf are sync'd to the 2.0 httpd.conf. Can anyone confirm a need for this? If so, I'll send a patch that does this. 2) Quite a while ago, Martin committed PNG format analogs of the GIFs in

Re: Logs and logs and logs [oh my!]

2001-12-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 11:53 AM From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Isn't it time to drop TransferLog and CookieLog? +1 We can accomplish the same by allowing that LogFormat provides the default for the CustomLog

RE: Logs and logs and logs [oh my!]

2001-12-30 Thread Lars Eilebrecht
According to William A. Rowe, Jr.: Isn't it time to drop TransferLog and CookieLog? +1 ciao... -- Lars Eilebrecht - Just give me the coffee... [EMAIL PROTECTED] - and no one will get hurt.

RE: Logs and logs and logs [oh my!]

2001-12-30 Thread Joshua Slive
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I agree it's simplest, but under my proposal, we lost no functionallity. If we agree nobody uses the 'default' format TransferLog, then I'm fine with your suggestion. But I rather guess this is too radical, and some users probably

Re: httpd.conf Qs

2001-12-30 Thread Eli Marmor
Dale Ghent wrote: Hey, I have two questions here: 1) I'm working on making sure that directives in the Apache 1.3.x httpd.conf are sync'd to the 2.0 httpd.conf. Can anyone confirm a need for this? If so, I'll send a patch that does this. httpd.conf of 2.0 is not backward compatible with

Re: httpd.conf Qs

2001-12-30 Thread Dale Ghent
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Eli Marmor wrote: | Dale Ghent wrote: | | Hey, I have two questions here: | | 1) I'm working on making sure that directives in the Apache 1.3.x | httpd.conf are sync'd to the 2.0 httpd.conf. Can anyone confirm a need | for this? If so, I'll send a patch that does this.

Re: Logs and logs and logs [oh my!]

2001-12-30 Thread Marc Slemko
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Isn't it time to drop TransferLog and CookieLog? We can accomplish the same by allowing that LogFormat provides the default for the CustomLog directive, in the absense of an optional [format] arg. And if we offer a built-in (or

Re: Logs and logs and logs [oh my!]

2001-12-30 Thread Sander van Zoest
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: And if we offer a built-in (or default-config'ed) 'cookie' format, of %{Cookie}n \%r\ %t, then it's a two bit change to turn a CookieLog into a CustomLog file cookie command. I added the %{COOKIE_NAME}C to 2.0 for logging a simple cookie. This

RE: httpd.conf Qs

2001-12-30 Thread Joshua Slive
From: Dale Ghent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] What I'm more-or-less referring to are the Language-related stuff and IfModule containers (as well as bringing up some of the more informative comments and such from 1.3.) Apache 2.0's httpd.conf is based off of 1.3.9's, and there have been a

Re: [PATCH] mod_proxy truncates status line

2001-12-30 Thread Adam Sussman
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 02:58:16PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: Adam Sussman wrote: Mod_proxy truncates the status line returned by the proxied server. One character gets snipped off of the end of the status line. Are you 100% sure the buffer is big enough to do this? If the buffer

Asking, for good measure...

2001-12-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
if is there any valid reason to process arguments in mod_include in series, as we do? An example patch of a more flexible set tag is attached, for illustration. It further unsets the variable, if there is no value. Any reason not to introduce this? Bill handle_set.patch Description:

Just for kicks...

2001-12-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
the follow SSI illustrates the versitility of the new regex features of mod_include. Throw it in a HEADER.html, turn on the INCLUDES filter, and play :) form Show me a select name=F option !--#if expr=$QUERY_STRING = /F=0/ --selected !--#endif -- value=0 Plain

Re: Asking, for good measure...

2001-12-30 Thread Brian Pane
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: if is there any valid reason to process arguments in mod_include in series, as we do? An example patch of a more flexible set tag is attached, for illustration. It further unsets the variable, if there is no value. Any reason not to introduce this? Bill The