Re: httpd-test negotiation failures.

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Yes, just one other (little) thing... the appropriate .conf sections for the bad resources below would be great! Thanks!!! Sorry, I am 'between machines' right now. I've pruned your comments below so I can print and study them. I'm near-certain this is a behavior change based on the new

Re: httpd-test negotiation failures.

2002-02-04 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Yes, just one other (little) thing... the appropriate .conf sections for the bad resources below would be great! See below for a some verbose expected-received-description output I just added. The conf is this: ## ## mod_negotiation test config

Re: I'd like to release 1.3.24...

2002-02-04 Thread Martin Kraemer
Here's a patch to bail out on ./Configure errors. Sorry about the 3 redirection, but without it, we would have to create an intermediate file (and need to prevent race conditions, need to clean up all that). Also, I added a 21 redirection to Configure's sanity check report (without it, the echo

[PATCH] Re: I'd like to release 1.3.24...

2002-02-04 Thread Martin Kraemer
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:58:25PM +0100, Kraemer, Martin wrote: Here's a patch to bail out on ./Configure errors. Sorry about the 3 redirection, but without it, we would have to create an intermediate file (and need to prevent race conditions, need to clean up all that). Only I forgot to

Re: [PATCH] SSL_* in suexec safe env list

2002-02-04 Thread Martin Kraemer
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 12:37:58PM -0500, Joshua Slive wrote: From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] triple rather then double strncmp: -if (!strncmp(*ep, HTTP_, 5)) { +if (!strncmp(*ep, HTTP_, 5) || !strncmp(*ep, HTTPS, 5) || (no, not like that. not strncmp,

Re: I'd like to release 1.3.24...

2002-02-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
Here's a patch to bail out on ./Configure errors. Sorry about the 3 redirection, but without it, we would have to create an intermediate file (and need to prevent race conditions, need to clean up all that). Let me see look into this... I think there's a clearer way... Also, I added a 21

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_disk_cache.c

2002-02-04 Thread Martin Kraemer
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:06:45PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: static const command_rec disk_cache_cmds[] = { -AP_INIT_FLAG(CacheRoot, set_cache_root, NULL, RSRC_CONF, +AP_INIT_FLAG1(CacheRoot, set_cache_root, NULL, RSRC_CONF, The directory to store

Re: pre-compiled binaries of apache for NextStep or OpenStep

2002-02-04 Thread Ben Hyde
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Not acked. Is this a PMC decision? ... From: Chris Swenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... I noticed you no longer have pre-compiled binaries of Apache for NextStep or OpenStep available on the Apache website. If a group of people (myself included) volunteered

Re: WXP

2002-02-04 Thread Ben Hyde
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: There's a FAQ I'm getting more and more to which I don't know the answer; to wit, does Apache 1.3.* run on Windows XP? What *is* the answer? Not known not to work.

Re: WXP

2002-02-04 Thread Stipe Tolj
Ben Hyde wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: There's a FAQ I'm getting more and more to which I don't know the answer; to wit, does Apache 1.3.* run on Windows XP? What *is* the answer? Not known not to work. at least our Cygwin 1.3 based port of 1.3.x works on Windows XP. So

RE: WXP

2002-02-04 Thread Ryan Bloom
I had 1.3.22 working on one of my XP boxes a few months ago. It is a real pity that I now have multiple XP machines, and just one lonely Linux VM. :-( Ryan -- Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 645 Howard St. [EMAIL

Re: WXP

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:24 AM Ben Hyde wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: There's a FAQ I'm getting more and more to which I don't know the answer; to wit, does Apache 1.3.* run on Windows XP? What *is* the answer? Not known

Connection timed out: read_request_line() failed

2002-02-04 Thread Dwayne Miller
I'm getting this error in my log file when I post a form, but the code looks like it should be ignoring timeout errors. Something is definitely wrong with the handling of the request because it appears that all of the form data is missing. The full error message is... [Mon Feb 04 09:00:03

Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled

2002-02-04 Thread Greg Ames
Ryan Bloom wrote: I think we all agree that once a tarball is public (meaning that non-developers have the *potential* of grabbing it) if there's something wrong with it, we have to bump before we reroll. If it makes it to /www.apache.org/dist/httpd/, then I agree. If the only place

Re: Connection timed out: read_request_line() failed

2002-02-04 Thread Bill Stoddard
POSTs to CGIs look okay in my testing. Can you provide a bit more info about your application? Is it a CGI? Bill I'm getting this error in my log file when I post a form, but the code looks like it should be ignoring timeout errors. Something is definitely wrong with the handling of the

Re: Connection timed out: read_request_line() failed

2002-02-04 Thread Dwayne Miller
The details... It's a ColdFusion script, so the processing module is mod_coldfusion.so. The script runs, it just doesn't see any of the form data. And I see the error logged with every post. I'm using SSL, so I'm also configured with mod_ssl. Interesting part is that it seems to be

Re: 2.0.31 on Windows

2002-02-04 Thread Dwayne Miller
I'm not familiar with the -n apache2 option, but I was just trying to figure out why I can't get apache to run as a service. I'm using the -k start option, a message that it's starting the service appears, but nothing happens. In the service.c file, I added a line to print the 'Failed to

Re: 2.0.31 shutdown after heavy load

2002-02-04 Thread Greg Ames
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: Hi, I'm getting the following message when I try to stop apache after a stress-test on HPUX (using webstone).. Inspite of the SIGKILL message, the process does not exit.. A second attempt is successful.. Any clues regarding what may

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker worker.c

2002-02-04 Thread Bill Stoddard
Actually, this patch is not the only (or even main) culprit. The switch to use the shared scoreboard is fatally broken. I am in the process of keeping the spirit of Ryan's patch to only use pre_mpm in the parent and revert back to non shared scoreboard for Windows. Bill - Original

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker worker.c

2002-02-04 Thread Bill Stoddard
Start apache as a service. That seems to make a difference. Bill I'm not having this problem. I just started Apache, and killed off the child process five times on my XP box. Each time, a new child was created to take its place. I stopped the child by opening the Task Manager, and

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker worker.c

2002-02-04 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:01:49PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote: Actually, this patch is not the only (or even main) culprit. The switch to use the shared scoreboard is fatally broken. I am in the process of keeping the spirit of Ryan's patch to only use pre_mpm in the parent and revert back

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker worker.c

2002-02-04 Thread Ryan Bloom
Ahhh, I hadn't tried that yet. Ryan -- Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED] San Francisco, CA -Original Message- From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,

Re: 2.0.31 on Windows

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:50 AM Couple of problems noticed in a few minutes of testing 1. apache -k restart -n apache2 is broken. hangs forever and a new child process is never started. 2. If I kill off the child process (by attaching and

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker worker.c

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 12:01 PM Actually, this patch is not the only (or even main) culprit. The switch to use the shared scoreboard is fatally broken. I am in the process of keeping the spirit of Ryan's patch to only use pre_mpm in the

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src Configure CHANGES

2002-02-04 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: martin 02/02/04 05:57:40 Modified:.configure src Configure CHANGES Log: Fix the longstanding bug that errors (returned by src/Configure) would not be noticed by the top level configure script. That was bad for

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker worker.c

2002-02-04 Thread Ryan Bloom
Modified:.CHANGES STATUS server/mpm/perchild perchild.c server/mpm/prefork prefork.c server/mpm/worker worker.c Log: Not being able to bind to a socket is a fatal error. This makes all MPMs treat it as such. We now print a

Re: Ongoing 2.0.31 and php hiccups

2002-02-04 Thread David Ford
Aren't the APIs in apache HEAD significantly different preventing PHP 4.1 from being used? I gathered that you -must- use PHP42 HEAD. Thank you, David MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: I've been using PHP 4.1.1 and things seem to be okay for me (on HPUX).. I'm using PHP 4.1.1

[PATCH] Caseless sorting for mod_autoindex

2002-02-04 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
This got sent to me privately a long time ago, but got lost in the maze of twisty little passages that is my mail. It's against 1.3, but if approved I'll bring it forward to 2.0. I've reworked the original patch from Tullio Andreatta to apply against HEAD. The patch adds the IgnoreCase keyword

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

2002-02-04 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:51:59PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wrowe 02/02/04 10:51:59 Modified:.STATUS Log: Brrr... it's frigid in Chicago today! Hope FirstBill doesn't mind if I speak for us both here. Revision ChangesPath 1.453 +7 -5

Re: [PATCH] Caseless sorting for mod_autoindex

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
++1 for 2.0 [just saw such a complaint this week.] -0 for 1.3 Forewarned that o abc o Abc o Bcd o bcd o xyz o Xyz is equally possible with this patch, it doesn't sort by case at all. When you look at 2.0, you will notice most of these cosmetics can be controlled by the query string. A

RE: 2.0.31 shutdown after heavy load

2002-02-04 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
This was with the worker MPM.. I initially suspected the latency - 'waited for about 5 minutes, and then nothing happened till I issued a kill -9 command. I'll try again today, and will probably post the stack trace of the parent process when it happens. Thanks -Madhu -Original Message-

[PATCH] mod_mime.c

2002-02-04 Thread RCHAPACH Rochester
In theme with the broken module being allowed in ap_directory_walk() and ap_file_walk(), find_ct() of mod_mime.c needs the following change to allow a missing filename to pass through to the handlers. I am pretty sure that DECLINED is the correct return, but I don't think it matters. Index:

Re: more minor 2.0.31 breakage

2002-02-04 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Greg Ames wrote: I just noticed that autoindex listings from apache.org no longer display the folder icon for directories. You see a '?' icon instead. The Rodent tells me there's some kind of magic type that mod_autoindex uses to figure this out. Not debugged yet. As an unsubstantiated

RE: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-04 Thread Joshua Slive
From: Victor J. Orlikowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Ugh. Behind on mail. My fault; needed it for cadaver for testing... ;) Victor: You need a little context on your mail. I don't know about others, but I have no idea what you are replying to. Joshua.

RE: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-04 Thread Victor J. Orlikowski
My apologies. The context was to provide a semi-humorous reply to the breakage I caused Jeff by installing Expat on the AIX box we use. Been a while since the mail, been a while since I posted last. Grrr. ;) Victor -- Victor J. Orlikowski | The Wall is Down, But the Threat Remains!

new mod_proxy + multiple set-cookie

2002-02-04 Thread Joshua Slive
Just a heads up: There are multiple bug reports that claim that the new mod_proxy is messing up when multiple set-cookie headers are present, which prevents some sites like hotmail from working correctly. Anyone who is interested should check the bug database. Joshua.

Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled (take 2)

2002-02-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: Ugh. Behind on mail. My fault; needed it for cadaver for testing... ;) Why do I feel like I just entered an episode of 6 Feet Under? :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Apache2 and php

2002-02-04 Thread David Ford
What does apache2 need in httpd.conf to properly shunt php files through the php engine before serving them? Apparently it needs more than just Load libphp4.so Note, I'm using php 4.1.1 with httpd_2_0 HEAD. Thank you, David

Re: Apache2 and php

2002-02-04 Thread Daniel Lopez
This question should be directed to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list You need to add the following: AddType application/x-httpd-php .php Daniel On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 05:20:25PM -0500, David Ford wrote: What does apache2 need in httpd.conf to properly shunt php files through the php engine

--with-module annoyingness

2002-02-04 Thread Ryan Bloom
Would anybody mind if --with-module created a symbolic link in the modules/foo/ directory to the specified module? Right now, we copy the module to that directory, which means that if you edit the .c file, it gets out of sync with the version in the original directory. If you have the .c file

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/proxy proxy_ftp.c

2002-02-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 04:11:38PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote: On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 05:18:19PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jerenkrantz02/02/03 09:18:19 Modified:modules/proxy proxy_ftp.c Log: Make sure we include time.h if it is there. (Other mojo may be needed for

Re: 2.0.31 on Windows

2002-02-04 Thread Dwayne Miller
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: From: Dwayne Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:57 PM Subject: Re: 2.0.31 on Windows I tracked down my problem with not being able to run Apache as a service. The ServerRoot param was not set correctly. It was

Thoughts on 2.0.32

2002-02-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
Since it sounds like Win32 is busted (I'd say it'd be fine to say that .31 is beta but doesn't work on Win32, but wrowe doesn't like that), how about just taking the .31 tree, tagging *that* as .32, and carefully bumping files that resolve issues into .32 and the RM can carefully decide which

RE: Thoughts on 2.0.32

2002-02-04 Thread Ryan Bloom
Since it sounds like Win32 is busted (I'd say it'd be fine to say that .31 is beta but doesn't work on Win32, but wrowe doesn't like that), IMNSHO, .31 should be released as a beta, with the understanding that it doesn't work on Win32. That is a PITA, but it wouldn't be the first time that a

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker worker.c

2002-02-04 Thread Ryan Bloom
I finally had time to review this patch, and I have some comments. Log: This patch restores most of Ryan's patch (11/12/2001) to remove the client_socket from the conn_rec. Diffs from Ryan's patch include: - rename the create_connection hook to install_transport_filters - move

Re: Thoughts on 2.0.32

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 5:52 PM Since it sounds like Win32 is busted (I'd say it'd be fine to say that .31 is beta but doesn't work on Win32, but wrowe doesn't like that), IMNSHO, .31 should be released as a beta, with the understanding that

Re: 2.0.31 on Windows

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Dwayne Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 5:13 PM Which Win32 OS are you using, exactly? I'm on Windows 2000, build 2195, SP2 Win2000/XP have NULL stdin/stdout/stderr handles... the create_process() invokes ap_open_stderr_log() which in turn invokes

Re: --with-module annoyingness

2002-02-04 Thread Sander van Zoest
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote: Would anybody mind if --with-module created a symbolic link in the modules/foo/ directory to the specified module? Right now, we copy the module to that directory, which means that if you edit the .c file, it gets out of sync with the version in the

Re: 2.0.31 on Windows

2002-02-04 Thread Dwayne Miller
I guess I'm alittle confused... I don't see any errors related to NULL file handles. And the thing about the ServerRoot starting with a /, it seems that the process found the config file okay, so wouldn't it also know what the ServerRoot should be? And why doesn't Apache complain about the

[PATCH] mod_disk_cache.c mod_cache.c

2002-02-04 Thread Joseph Wayne Norton
I made a mimimal set of changes to mod_disk_cache.c so that I could simply try out the current mod_disk_cache functionality. This patch fixes a few core dumps related to usage of the apr_pstrcat method and some minor compiler warnings. Index: modules/experimental/mod_cache.c

versioning process

2002-02-04 Thread Roy T. Fielding
I know that there have been lots of changes in .32-dev since .31 was tagged that have challenged the stability of the current tree. If we took .32 and made it as close to .31 as we could but with the *minimum* required changes to make .32, we could be close to a real beta. (This seems to

Wondering what I'm missing...

2002-02-04 Thread Paul J. Reder
Perhaps I'm just really dense, but I don't see where (in the mod_auth_digest.c code in httpd-2.0 HEAD) the following variable: static apr_rmm_t *client_rmm = NULL; ever gets initialized before it is used in the 5 calls to: apr_rmm_malloc(client_rmm, ...); and the

Re: more minor 2.0.31 breakage

2002-02-04 Thread Stas Bekman
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Greg Ames wrote: I just noticed that autoindex listings from apache.org no longer display the folder icon for directories. You see a '?' icon instead. The Rodent tells me there's some kind of magic type that mod_autoindex uses to figure this out. Not debugged

Re: [PATCH] mod_disk_cache.c mod_cache.c

2002-02-04 Thread Bill Stoddard
Committed. Thanks Joe. Bill I made a mimimal set of changes to mod_disk_cache.c so that I could simply try out the current mod_disk_cache functionality. This patch fixes a few core dumps related to usage of the apr_pstrcat method and some minor compiler warnings. Index:

Re: versioning process

2002-02-04 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
* On 2002-02-04 at 22:07, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say: After the group spends enough time pounding on a release to call it GA, there is no reason why we cannot take the code and reversion it a 2.1.0 and start treating that as the stable branch. It may be

Re: Wondering what I'm missing...

2002-02-04 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
* On 2002-02-04 at 22:07, Paul J. Reder [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say: Perhaps I'm just really dense, but I don't see where (in the mod_auth_digest.c code in httpd-2.0 HEAD) the following variable: static apr_rmm_t *client_rmm = NULL; ever gets

Re: more minor 2.0.31 breakage

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:39 PM Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Greg Ames wrote: I just noticed that autoindex listings from apache.org no longer display the folder icon for directories. You see a '?' icon instead. The Rodent tells me

Re: versioning process

2002-02-04 Thread Lars Eilebrecht
According to Roy T. Fielding: And, personally, I have always hated the stupid alpha/beta/GA distinction. Our release process became constipated on the day that was added. I tend to agree. And our users get (or area already) confused by this release process. ciao... -- Lars Eilebrecht

Re: Wondering what I'm missing...

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Recognize that rmm_malloc returns apr_rmm_off_t's into an apr_rmm_t... you need to port all of the calls to deref through apr_rmm_baseaddr_get(), but be careful, don't store dereferenced real addresses in the rmm itself! - Original Message - From: Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: more minor 2.0.31 breakage

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:18 PM I think it's a bug. The sub-directory can be password-protected. Does it mean that mod_autoindex won't display it, since it'll fail to run the sub-request? By design, for better or worse [feel free to

mod_rewrite.h:133:18: ndbm.h: No such file or directory

2002-02-04 Thread Jie Gao
Hi All, It's that problem again, this time with apache_1.3.23 on linux (rh7.2). I am building it with php4 and most of other modules. Here's my config: #! /bin/sh EAPI_MM=SYSTEM export EAPI_MM INCLUDES=-I/usr/include/db1 -I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.0/include -I/usr/local/include \

Re: 2.0.31 shutdown after heavy load + core dumps on heavy load

2002-02-04 Thread Adam Sussman
I'm seeing the same thing with the prefork mpm under linux with lots of load. Possibly it is something outside of the mpms themselves? The processes definitly don't go away until you kill them with SIGKILL a few times. One thing I noticed is that, under load, processes seem to spend a lot