Yes, just one other (little) thing... the appropriate .conf sections for
the bad resources below would be great!
Thanks!!! Sorry, I am 'between machines' right now. I've pruned your comments
below so I can print and study them. I'm near-certain this is a behavior
change based on the new
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Yes, just one other (little) thing... the appropriate .conf sections for
the bad resources below would be great!
See below for a some verbose expected-received-description output I just
added.
The conf is this:
##
## mod_negotiation test config
Here's a patch to bail out on ./Configure errors. Sorry about the 3
redirection, but without it, we would have to create an intermediate
file (and need to prevent race conditions, need to clean up all that).
Also, I added a 21 redirection to Configure's sanity check report
(without it, the echo
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:58:25PM +0100, Kraemer, Martin wrote:
Here's a patch to bail out on ./Configure errors. Sorry about the 3
redirection, but without it, we would have to create an intermediate
file (and need to prevent race conditions, need to clean up all that).
Only I forgot to
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 12:37:58PM -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
triple rather then
double strncmp:
-if (!strncmp(*ep, HTTP_, 5)) {
+if (!strncmp(*ep, HTTP_, 5) || !strncmp(*ep, HTTPS, 5) ||
(no, not like that. not strncmp,
Here's a patch to bail out on ./Configure errors. Sorry about the 3
redirection, but without it, we would have to create an intermediate
file (and need to prevent race conditions, need to clean up all that).
Let me see look into this... I think there's a clearer way...
Also, I added a 21
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:06:45PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
static const command_rec disk_cache_cmds[] =
{
-AP_INIT_FLAG(CacheRoot, set_cache_root, NULL, RSRC_CONF,
+AP_INIT_FLAG1(CacheRoot, set_cache_root, NULL, RSRC_CONF,
The directory to store
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Not acked. Is this a PMC decision?
...
From: Chris Swenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I noticed you no longer have pre-compiled binaries of Apache for NextStep
or OpenStep available on the Apache website. If a group of people (myself
included) volunteered
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
There's a FAQ I'm getting more and more to which I don't
know the answer; to wit, does Apache 1.3.* run on Windows XP?
What *is* the answer?
Not known not to work.
Ben Hyde wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
There's a FAQ I'm getting more and more to which I don't
know the answer; to wit, does Apache 1.3.* run on Windows XP?
What *is* the answer?
Not known not to work.
at least our Cygwin 1.3 based port of 1.3.x works on Windows XP. So
I had 1.3.22 working on one of my XP boxes a few months ago. It is a
real pity that I now have multiple XP machines, and just one lonely
Linux VM.
:-(
Ryan
--
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
645 Howard St. [EMAIL
From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:24 AM
Ben Hyde wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
There's a FAQ I'm getting more and more to which I don't
know the answer; to wit, does Apache 1.3.* run on Windows XP?
What *is* the answer?
Not known
I'm getting this error in my log file when I post a form, but the code
looks like it should be ignoring timeout errors. Something is
definitely wrong with the handling of the request because it appears
that all of the form data is missing.
The full error message is...
[Mon Feb 04 09:00:03
Ryan Bloom wrote:
I think we all agree that once a tarball
is public (meaning that non-developers have the *potential* of
grabbing it) if there's something wrong with it, we have to bump
before we reroll.
If it makes it to /www.apache.org/dist/httpd/, then I agree. If the only place
POSTs to CGIs look okay in my testing. Can you provide a bit more info about your
application? Is it a CGI?
Bill
I'm getting this error in my log file when I post a form, but the code
looks like it should be ignoring timeout errors. Something is
definitely wrong with the handling of the
The details...
It's a ColdFusion script, so the processing module is mod_coldfusion.so.
The script runs, it just doesn't see any of the form data. And I see
the error logged with every post.
I'm using SSL, so I'm also configured with mod_ssl.
Interesting part is that it seems to be
I'm not familiar with the -n apache2 option, but I was just trying to
figure out why I can't get apache to run as a service. I'm using the -k
start option, a message that it's starting the service appears, but
nothing happens. In the service.c file, I added a line to print the
'Failed to
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting the following message when I try to stop apache after a
stress-test on HPUX (using webstone).. Inspite of the SIGKILL message, the
process does not exit.. A second attempt is successful.. Any clues regarding
what may
Actually, this patch is not the only (or even main) culprit. The switch to use the
shared
scoreboard is fatally broken. I am in the process of keeping the spirit of Ryan's
patch to
only use pre_mpm in the parent and revert back to non shared scoreboard for Windows.
Bill
- Original
Start apache as a service. That seems to make a difference.
Bill
I'm not having this problem. I just started Apache, and killed off the
child process five times on my XP box. Each time, a new child was
created to take its place.
I stopped the child by opening the Task Manager, and
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:01:49PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Actually, this patch is not the only (or even main) culprit. The switch to use the
shared
scoreboard is fatally broken. I am in the process of keeping the spirit of Ryan's
patch to
only use pre_mpm in the parent and revert back
Ahhh, I hadn't tried that yet.
Ryan
--
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
San Francisco, CA
-Original Message-
From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:50 AM
Couple of problems noticed in a few minutes of testing
1. apache -k restart -n apache2 is broken. hangs forever and a new child process is
never
started.
2. If I kill off the child process (by attaching and
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 12:01 PM
Actually, this patch is not the only (or even main) culprit. The switch to use the
shared
scoreboard is fatally broken. I am in the process of keeping the spirit of Ryan's
patch to
only use pre_mpm in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
martin 02/02/04 05:57:40
Modified:.configure
src Configure CHANGES
Log:
Fix the longstanding bug that errors (returned by src/Configure)
would not be noticed by the top level configure script.
That was bad for
Modified:.CHANGES STATUS
server/mpm/perchild perchild.c
server/mpm/prefork prefork.c
server/mpm/worker worker.c
Log:
Not being able to bind to a socket is a fatal error. This makes all
MPMs treat it as such. We now print a
Aren't the APIs in apache HEAD significantly different preventing PHP
4.1 from being used? I gathered that you -must- use PHP42 HEAD.
Thank you,
David
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
I've been using PHP 4.1.1 and things seem to be okay for me (on HPUX).. I'm
using PHP 4.1.1
This got sent to me privately a long time ago, but got
lost in the maze of twisty little passages that is my mail.
It's against 1.3, but if approved I'll bring it forward to
2.0. I've reworked the original patch from Tullio Andreatta
to apply against HEAD.
The patch adds the IgnoreCase keyword
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:51:59PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 02/02/04 10:51:59
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
Brrr... it's frigid in Chicago today! Hope FirstBill doesn't mind if
I speak for us both here.
Revision ChangesPath
1.453 +7 -5
++1 for 2.0 [just saw such a complaint this week.]
-0 for 1.3
Forewarned that
o abc
o Abc
o Bcd
o bcd
o xyz
o Xyz
is equally possible with this patch, it doesn't sort by case at all.
When you look at 2.0, you will notice most of these cosmetics can be
controlled by the query string. A
This was with the worker MPM.. I initially suspected the latency - 'waited
for about 5 minutes, and then nothing happened till I issued a kill -9
command. I'll try again today, and will probably post the stack trace of the
parent process when it happens.
Thanks
-Madhu
-Original Message-
In theme with the broken module being allowed in ap_directory_walk()
and ap_file_walk(), find_ct() of mod_mime.c needs the following change
to allow a missing filename to pass through to the handlers. I am pretty
sure that DECLINED is the correct return, but I don't think it matters.
Index:
Greg Ames wrote:
I just noticed that autoindex listings from apache.org no
longer display the folder icon for directories. You see
a '?' icon instead. The Rodent tells me there's some kind
of magic type that mod_autoindex uses to figure this out.
Not debugged yet.
As an unsubstantiated
From: Victor J. Orlikowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ugh. Behind on mail.
My fault; needed it for cadaver for testing... ;)
Victor: You need a little context on your mail. I don't know about others,
but I have no idea what you are replying to.
Joshua.
My apologies.
The context was to provide a semi-humorous reply to the breakage I
caused Jeff by installing Expat on the AIX box we use.
Been a while since the mail, been a while since I posted last.
Grrr. ;)
Victor
--
Victor J. Orlikowski | The Wall is Down, But the Threat Remains!
Just a heads up: There are multiple bug reports that claim that the new
mod_proxy is messing up when multiple set-cookie headers are present, which
prevents some sites like hotmail from working correctly. Anyone who is
interested should check the bug database.
Joshua.
Victor J. Orlikowski wrote:
Ugh. Behind on mail.
My fault; needed it for cadaver for testing... ;)
Why do I feel like I just entered an episode of 6 Feet Under? :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does apache2 need in httpd.conf to properly shunt php files through
the php engine before serving them?
Apparently it needs more than just Load libphp4.so
Note, I'm using php 4.1.1 with httpd_2_0 HEAD.
Thank you,
David
This question should be directed to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list
You need to add the following:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
Daniel
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 05:20:25PM -0500, David Ford wrote:
What does apache2 need in httpd.conf to properly shunt php files through
the php engine
Would anybody mind if --with-module created a symbolic link in the
modules/foo/ directory to the specified module? Right now, we copy the
module to that directory, which means that if you edit the .c file, it
gets out of sync with the version in the original directory. If you
have the .c file
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 04:11:38PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 05:18:19PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jerenkrantz02/02/03 09:18:19
Modified:modules/proxy proxy_ftp.c
Log:
Make sure we include time.h if it is there. (Other mojo may be needed for
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: Dwayne Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: 2.0.31 on Windows
I tracked down my problem with not being able to run Apache as a
service. The ServerRoot param was not set correctly. It was
Since it sounds like Win32 is busted (I'd say it'd be fine to
say that .31 is beta but doesn't work on Win32, but wrowe doesn't
like that), how about just taking the .31 tree, tagging *that* as
.32, and carefully bumping files that resolve issues into .32 and
the RM can carefully decide which
Since it sounds like Win32 is busted (I'd say it'd be fine to
say that .31 is beta but doesn't work on Win32, but wrowe doesn't
like that),
IMNSHO, .31 should be released as a beta, with the understanding that it
doesn't work on Win32. That is a PITA, but it wouldn't be the first
time that a
I finally had time to review this patch, and I have some comments.
Log:
This patch restores most of Ryan's patch (11/12/2001) to remove the
client_socket from the conn_rec. Diffs from Ryan's patch include:
- rename the create_connection hook to install_transport_filters
- move
From: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 5:52 PM
Since it sounds like Win32 is busted (I'd say it'd be fine to
say that .31 is beta but doesn't work on Win32, but wrowe doesn't
like that),
IMNSHO, .31 should be released as a beta, with the understanding that
From: Dwayne Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 5:13 PM
Which Win32 OS are you using, exactly?
I'm on Windows 2000, build 2195, SP2
Win2000/XP have NULL stdin/stdout/stderr handles...
the create_process() invokes ap_open_stderr_log() which in turn invokes
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote:
Would anybody mind if --with-module created a symbolic link in the
modules/foo/ directory to the specified module? Right now, we copy the
module to that directory, which means that if you edit the .c file, it
gets out of sync with the version in the
I guess I'm alittle confused... I don't see any errors related to NULL
file handles. And the thing about the ServerRoot starting with a /, it
seems that the process found the config file okay, so wouldn't it also
know what the ServerRoot should be?
And why doesn't Apache complain about the
I made a mimimal set of changes to mod_disk_cache.c so that I could
simply try out the current mod_disk_cache functionality. This patch
fixes a few core dumps related to usage of the apr_pstrcat method and
some minor compiler warnings.
Index: modules/experimental/mod_cache.c
I know that there have been lots of changes in .32-dev since .31 was
tagged that have challenged the stability of the current tree. If
we took .32 and made it as close to .31 as we could but with the
*minimum* required changes to make .32, we could be close to a real
beta. (This seems to
Perhaps I'm just really dense, but I don't see where (in the
mod_auth_digest.c code in httpd-2.0 HEAD) the following variable:
static apr_rmm_t *client_rmm = NULL;
ever gets initialized before it is used in the 5 calls to:
apr_rmm_malloc(client_rmm, ...);
and the
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Greg Ames wrote:
I just noticed that autoindex listings from apache.org no
longer display the folder icon for directories. You see
a '?' icon instead. The Rodent tells me there's some kind
of magic type that mod_autoindex uses to figure this out.
Not debugged
Committed. Thanks Joe.
Bill
I made a mimimal set of changes to mod_disk_cache.c so that I could
simply try out the current mod_disk_cache functionality. This patch
fixes a few core dumps related to usage of the apr_pstrcat method and
some minor compiler warnings.
Index:
* On 2002-02-04 at 22:07,
Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say:
After the group spends enough time pounding on a release to call it GA,
there is no reason why we cannot take the code and reversion it a 2.1.0
and start treating that as the stable branch. It may be
* On 2002-02-04 at 22:07,
Paul J. Reder [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say:
Perhaps I'm just really dense, but I don't see where (in the
mod_auth_digest.c code in httpd-2.0 HEAD) the following variable:
static apr_rmm_t *client_rmm = NULL;
ever gets
From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:39 PM
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Greg Ames wrote:
I just noticed that autoindex listings from apache.org no
longer display the folder icon for directories. You see
a '?' icon instead. The Rodent tells me
According to Roy T. Fielding:
And, personally, I have always hated the stupid alpha/beta/GA distinction.
Our release process became constipated on the day that was added.
I tend to agree.
And our users get (or area already) confused by this release process.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
Recognize that rmm_malloc returns apr_rmm_off_t's into an apr_rmm_t...
you need to port all of the calls to deref through apr_rmm_baseaddr_get(),
but be careful, don't store dereferenced real addresses in the rmm itself!
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:18 PM
I think it's a bug. The sub-directory can be password-protected. Does it
mean that mod_autoindex won't display it, since it'll fail to run the
sub-request?
By design, for better or worse [feel free to
Hi All,
It's that problem again, this time with apache_1.3.23 on linux (rh7.2).
I am building it with php4 and most of other modules. Here's my config:
#! /bin/sh
EAPI_MM=SYSTEM
export EAPI_MM
INCLUDES=-I/usr/include/db1 -I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.0/include -I/usr/local/include
\
I'm seeing the same thing with the prefork mpm under linux with lots of load.
Possibly it
is something outside of the mpms themselves? The processes definitly don't go away
until
you kill them with SIGKILL a few times. One thing I noticed is that, under load,
processes
seem to spend a lot
62 matches
Mail list logo