RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c

2002-02-25 Thread Ryan Bloom
RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: + +* With AP_MODE_EXHAUSTIVE in the core, it is finally clear to me + how the Perchild MPM should be re-written. It hasn't worked + correctly since filters were added because it wasn't possible to

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c

2002-02-25 Thread Ryan Bloom
RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: + +* With AP_MODE_EXHAUSTIVE in the core, it is finally clear to me + how the Perchild MPM should be re-written. It hasn't worked + correctly since filters were added because it wasn't

[BUG] [Apache 2] configure options get discarded

2002-02-25 Thread Thom May
Using a clean checkout of Apache2 (also tested with the 2.0.32-alpha tarball) it appears that most of the Directory and file names options get overwritten when configure invokes APACHE_LAYOUT() This is because no check is made to see whether --enable-layout has been passed to configure before the

RE: 2.0.32 + PHP 4 CVS

2002-02-25 Thread Austin Gonyou
I don't know if you saw the further description of this, but it seems it's a glibc/gcc problem. The issue only comes when compbining PHP with apache2 though as a .so. this is MPM independant so far. On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 16:05, NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: what is the issue exactly

incorrect getopt(3) usage in apache (fwd)

2002-02-25 Thread Marc Slemko
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:44:18 -0700 From: Peter Valchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: incorrect getopt(3) usage in apache Index: os/netware/getopt.c === RCS file:

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c

2002-02-25 Thread Ryan Bloom
RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: + +* With AP_MODE_EXHAUSTIVE in the core, it is finally clear to me + how the Perchild MPM should be re-written. It hasn't worked + correctly since filters were added because it wasn't possible to +

[PATCH] TPF-specific addition to main/http_main.c and modification to os/tpf/os.c

2002-02-25 Thread David McCreedy
This patch adds a small, TPF-specific section to http_main.c to interface with a new TPF operating system feature. (I used diff -ru9 because the normal diff -ru3 would not uniquely identify the code being changed in http_main.c.) Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thank

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c

2002-02-25 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 11:29:30PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: + +* With AP_MODE_EXHAUSTIVE in the core, it is finally clear to me + how the Perchild MPM should be re-written. It hasn't

[PATCH] Make the path to the conf file be configurable

2002-02-25 Thread Thom May
Hi. Currently the location of the conffile is hardcoded with: AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(SERVER_CONFIG_FILE, conf/$progname.conf This means that setting $sysconfdir or using a layout doesn't affect where apache2 looks for it's main conffile. This patch alters the define to use $sysconfdir/$progname.conf;

ProxyRemotePatch directive

2002-02-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'm thinking about adding the below draft to the CVS (after full review/test). There have been times with this functionality would have been pretty useful :) Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c === RCS file:

Re: [PATCH] Make the path to the conf file be configurable

2002-02-25 Thread Aaron Bannert
As long as we can ensure that the default $sysconfdir is $prefix/conf, I am +1 in concept. -aaron On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 05:50:20PM +, Thom May wrote: Hi. Currently the location of the conffile is hardcoded with: AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(SERVER_CONFIG_FILE, conf/$progname.conf This means

Re: ProxyRemotePatch directive

2002-02-25 Thread Chuck Murcko
Yes, I like this. Less late night calls. +1. It could eventually log the failed rule. Chuck On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 01:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I'm thinking about adding the below draft to the CVS (after full review/test). There have been times with this functionality would

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c

2002-02-25 Thread Sander van Zoest
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Brian Pane wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: + +* With AP_MODE_EXHAUSTIVE in the core, it is finally clear to me + how the Perchild MPM should be re-written. It hasn't worked +

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ssl mod_ssl.h ssl_engine_dh.c ssl_engine_init.c ssl_engine_kernel.c ssl_engine_rand.c ssl_scache_dbm.c ssl_scache_shmcb.c ssl_scache_shmht.c

2002-02-25 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 04:23:04AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @@ -154,18 +155,21 @@ RAND_seed(stackdata+n, 128); nDone += 128; -#if XXX_SBENTROPY_SOLVED /* - * XXX: This is entirely borked,

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ssl mod_ssl.h ssl_engine_dh.c ssl_engine_init.c ssl_engine_kernel.c ssl_engine_rand.c ssl_scache_dbm.c ssl_scache_shmcb.c ssl_scache_shmht.c

2002-02-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:55 PM 2/25/2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Why was the XXX_SBENTROPY_SOLVED define removed? I believe we wanted to avoid using scoreboard as an entropy source because it isn't very random. Therefore, I think we should just remove this code altogether. Or, am I missing something? --

Re: [PATCH] Pass all revelant build variables to sub-builds

2002-02-25 Thread Thom May
* Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Hi, when configuring apache2 using a layout, the necessary variables are not passed to the configure processes for apr, apr-util and pcre. This is a patch to correct this: It moves the parsing of the layout to before the configure processes for srclib

daemontools/foreground support in 1.3.*

2002-02-25 Thread Michael Handler
hi, guys. i've posted this patch for foreground/supervise support in the 1.3.* tree four times since january fifth (when the thread for support for this in 2.0 started), and i haven't heard word one back from anyone with commit access... i'd really like to see this (very simple) feature

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ssl mod_ssl.h ssl_engine_dh.c ssl_engine_init.c ssl_engine_kernel.c ssl_engine_rand.c ssl_scache_dbm.c ssl_scache_shmcb.c ssl_scache_shmht.c

2002-02-25 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 05:14:34PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote: If that's the agreement, then fine, I'll nuke it. It certainly caused me quite a bit of headache to get it to work in the first place, and I was definitely uneasy about the assumptions it was making about the layout of the

Re: daemontools/foreground support in 1.3.*

2002-02-25 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 05:26:44PM -0500, Michael Handler wrote: hi, guys. i've posted this patch for foreground/supervise support in the 1.3.* tree four times since january fifth (when the thread for support for this in 2.0 started), and i haven't heard word one back from anyone with commit

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ssl mod_ssl.h ssl_engine_dh.cssl_engine_init.c ssl_engine_kernel.c ssl_engine_rand.c ssl_scache_dbm.cssl_scache_shmcb.c ssl_scache_shmht.c

2002-02-25 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 01:55 PM 2/25/2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Why was the XXX_SBENTROPY_SOLVED define removed? I believe we wanted to avoid using scoreboard as an entropy source because it isn't very random. Therefore, I think we should just remove this

Re: daemontools/foreground support in 1.3.*

2002-02-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: IMHO, 1.3 should be in bug-fix mode only. No new features - as witnessed by our addition of AcceptMutex which screwed up 1.3.23 on Solaris. If you need this functionality, why not use 2.0 and help us get 2.0 to be GA? My SNAFU with no -lpthread

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c

2002-02-25 Thread Brian Pane
Ryan Bloom wrote: RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: + +* With AP_MODE_EXHAUSTIVE in the core, it is finally clear to me + how the Perchild MPM should be re-written. It hasn't worked + correctly since filters were added because it wasn't possible

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c

2002-02-25 Thread Austin Gonyou
I agree that documentation should cover this, but it should also be displayed in the ./configure if someone chooses that, to say, display a warning at the end of the configure or some such thing. At least there'd be an I told you so in there. On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 19:31, Joshua Slive wrote:

Re: seg fault in core_filters_type

2002-02-25 Thread Ian Holsman
Bill Stoddard wrote: I added an AddOutputFilterByType INCLUDES .shtml to my httpd.conf file. Then started hitting this segfault because r-content_type is NULL. I do not have an AddType for .shtml. Any ideas on the best way to handle this w/o segfaulting? I don't know why it is segfaulting..

Re: seg fault in core_filters_type

2002-02-25 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 03:46:56PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote: I added an AddOutputFilterByType INCLUDES .shtml to my httpd.conf file. Then started hitting this segfault because r-content_type is NULL. I do not have an AddType for .shtml. Any ideas on the best way to handle this w/o

thought I'd share this one with you.

2002-02-25 Thread Ian Holsman
we just came across this little gem. if your error page is dynamic (remote proxy'd page in our case) and it returns a 500 error you will go into a endless loop (and eat CPU) ..Ian