Hi,
Patch is attached to prevent line wrapping/munging.
I encountered this:
Line 396: return !!(cmd-limited (AP_METHOD_BIT methnum));
^^
Is that a typo or intentional?
Sander
config.patch
Description: Binary data
From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 March 2002 11:42
Hi,
Patch is attached to prevent line wrapping/munging.
I encountered this:
Line 396: return !!(cmd-limited (AP_METHOD_BIT methnum));
^^
Is that a typo or intentional?
I also forgot to
Hi,
More formatting/style/readability stuff.
Patch attached yadda yadda yadda.
Sander
connection.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
More detab.
Patch attached
Sander
error_bucket.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
Yet more detab.
Patch attached.
Sander
gen_test_char.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
More detab, etc.
Can this go? Was there a future purpose to this call,
or was it old code commented out?
Line 320: /*free(lr);*/
Patch attached.
Sander
listen.patch
Description: Binary data
At 05:29 PM 3/4/2002, you wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Rather than an option to not register a cleanup, perhaps a function to
kill the cleanup would be more generally useful.
apr_file_kill_cleanups(apr_file_t *file);
You still have a problem with the
Hi,
More detab, etc.
Patch attached.
Sander
log.patch
Description: Binary data
Christian Gross wrote:
Now here is another question What do all of you use as a development
tool?
gcc, gdb, and vi Jeff keeps telling me I should learn emacs, but I'm a bass
player and we're notoriously slow
Greg
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Solaris fixes were required to fix a hang in getaddrinfo().
Yeah, looked at the archive and patched the whole baby before posting...
Didn't change the behavior...
When I had the same symptom as Pier
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
More detab
Patch attached
Sander
I have only one reservation about this series of detab patches:
they'll break the one big pending change that I know of: Cliff's
bucket free list diffs It might be easier to get the bucket free
list changes applied first, and then
This bug report has come up before. Anyone mind if I commit a change
to 1.3 to fix this?
-aaron
- Forwarded message from Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: config/10040: Wrong file suffix for Swedish languge documents
To: [EMAIL
I tried posting this patch February 4, but it must have gotten lost in the
shuffle of 2.0.32,
so here it is again. We found this with Tomcat.
In theme with the broken module being allowed to leave r-filename
as NULL in ap_directory_walk() and ap_file_walk(),
the find_ct() of mod_mime.c needs
Greg,
Please do not mix function change with code style changes.
Bill
gregames02/03/05 07:46:21
Modified:server core.c
Log:
fix Directory ~ blah containers.
also, eradicate a few nefarious tabs which were found lurking in the vicinity.
Submitted by: Rob
At 5:53 PM -0800 3/4/02, Greg Stein wrote:
CONTENT: Filters of this type are valid for the time that this
content is used to satisfy a request. For simple requests,
this is identical to PROTOCOL, but internal redirects
and sub-requests can change
The mail with the attachement bounced because it was 100k.
If anyone wants it, please holler. It wasn't all simple
find-replace, so better not wait until conflicts arise ;)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 March 2002 14:00
To:
Title: Problems writing a module
I've got serious problems with the cmd struct. When I try to use it, if I have a struct to fill (in this case named solconf) , I get garbage even if I try to let fields empty. And If i use a linked list, I cannot make the one for the request destroy when the
I disagree with this patch. If we are getting failures on locks
then we have a bug somewhere and I'd rather not see us cover up
the problem by decreasing the verbosity.
-aaron
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:18:07PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick 02/03/05 13:18:07
Modified:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:23:30PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick 02/03/05 13:23:30
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
axe the entry on graceful restart problems with worker
I was too stupid to read the code to determine that the accept mutex
failure log messages
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I disagree with this patch. If we are getting failures on locks
then we have a bug somewhere and I'd rather not see us cover up
the problem by decreasing the verbosity.
Here is the sequence of events:
1) a thread in child process A is waiting on
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:53:23PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Here is the sequence of events:
1) a thread in child process A is waiting on semaphore
2) graceful restart triggered
3) parent process cleans up the semaphore
4) that thread in child process A gets a failure (EIDRM) from the
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:23:30PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick 02/03/05 13:23:30
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
axe the entry on graceful restart problems with worker
I was too stupid to read the code to
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:53:23PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Here is the sequence of events:
1) a thread in child process A is waiting on semaphore
2) graceful restart triggered
3) parent process cleans up the semaphore
4) that thread in
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 05:07:38PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:53:23PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Here is the sequence of events:
1) a thread in child process A is waiting on semaphore
2) graceful restart
Haven't had much time to think about this today, but I did discover that the XTHREAD
support in win32 apr_file io is seriously broken. apr_file_open(APR_XTHREAD) on Windows
should -not- be creating the overlapped structure and the io completion event. If an
open
file is being shared across
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 07:04:43AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
Why is this thing being run in the fixups phase? The whole point of the
insert_filters phase is to insert filters for the given resource Why
are we trying to insert resource based filters in the fixups?
Especially given that the
At 04:29 PM 3/5/2002, you wrote:
Also, why does mod_negotiation handle fixups in type_checker and
mod_dir does it in fixups? I'd suggest that we should move the
handle_multi call to be a fixups so that we are consistent where
our redirect calls occur -- justin
Cut it out already :-)
We don't
Will submit a patch later on this evening...
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; APR Development List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: apr_file_open() and caching
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:43:50PM -0600, William A Rowe, Jr wrote:
Cut it out already :-)
I'll try
Rbb and I chatted about this earlier today It seems like once the decision
is reached that we have a fast internal redirect, we should _stop_
processing
that main request Obviously some
Rbb and I chatted about this earlier today It seems like once the
decision
is reached that we have a fast internal redirect, we should _stop_
processing
that main request Obviously some well defined return value from
the
hook
fn, similar to DONE but not quite the same
Ahem,
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 05:07:38PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:53:23PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Here is the sequence of events:
1) a thread in child process A is
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 07:02:46PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Will they actually hold the semaphore while they are servicing long-lived
connections?
no the semaphore is held only during the poll+accept
I guess we'd have to make it so that as soon as that worker*
is done
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 05:03:16PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
axe the entry on graceful restart problems with worker
I was too stupid to read the code to determine that the accept mutex
failure log messages were harmless and not indicative of a real problem
I'll
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 07:02:46PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Will they actually hold the semaphore while they are servicing long-lived
connections?
no... the semaphore is held only during the poll+accept
I guess we'd have
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:13:29PM -0600, William A Rowe, Jr wrote:
At 07:53 PM 3/4/2002, you wrote:
Just wanted to state that I believe Ryan has the correct distinction here --
that we have three types of filters However, the third type is a misnomer,
and we can derive the proper name from
What would be most cool is to set an r-replace_request member to
the
subrequest we will run Then in the run request phase, look at
replace_request and run the insert_filters/run_handler against that
replacement
That could be goodness I agree that I'm not sure if it is really
Just built the current CVS of httpd-20 and ran into the following
problem:
I use PHP with httpd-20 through CGI and everything works fine with a
httpd-20 from a week ago, or so
Accessing a php file with the current CVS HEAD version of httpd-20
results in a ''download offer'' of the
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 05:41:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rbb 02/03/04 21:41:28
Modified:modules/http http_request.c
Log:
Remove another hack from the server. The add_required_filters function
was required to make sure that the sub request had the correct
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:35:35PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 10:34:55PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Just wanted to state that I believe Ryan has the correct distinction here --
that we have three types of filters. However, the third type is a misnomer,
and
39 matches
Mail list logo
