On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:16:56PM -0701, Jos Backus wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 07:27:46PM -0700, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
I've (mostly) written replacements for supervise, setuidgid, and
tcpserver. They use Single Unix APIs, haven't been ported to APR, and
have no docs yet, but they
Hello:
I am new in the list and i don´t know if this is the correct place for my
problem.
I am doing a proyect with Apache and i need to know how works Apache
internally. I need to look into its source code and try to understand how it
goes more or less.
My problem is that i have downloaded
Is there a unix equivalent to the Win32 Sleep(0) call? If so, then we can rip out all
this
cruft and use the patch I posted earlier.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:08 PM
Subject: [PATCH 2] worker MPM
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a unix equivalent to the Win32 Sleep(0) call? If so, then we can rip out
all this
cruft and use the patch I posted earlier.
google for pthread_yield() and compare the doc with the doc for
Win32's Sleep(0). I suspect it is the same as long as
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:trawick@rdu88-251-
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a unix equivalent to the Win32 Sleep(0) call? If so, then
we
can rip out all this
cruft and use the patch I posted earlier.
google for pthread_yield() and compare the doc with the doc
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:trawick@rdu88-251-
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a unix equivalent to the Win32 Sleep(0) call? If so, then
we
can rip out all this
cruft and use the patch I posted earlier.
google for pthread_yield() and compare the doc with
Copying APR, because this is becoming an APR issue quickly.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:trawick@rdu88-251-
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a unix equivalent to the Win32 Sleep(0) call? If so,
then
we
can rip out all this
cruft and use the patch I
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/developer/
Most people do not need to modify the server itself, but rather just write a
module. In that case pick one of the simple ones that come in the
distribution and see how things work.
Have a look at Doug MacEachern's Writing Apache Modules with mod_perl
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Is there a unix equivalent to the Win32 Sleep(0) call? If so, then we can rip out all
this
cruft and use the patch I posted earlier.
Can you repost your patch (or post a link to an archived copy)?
Thanks,
--Brian
Hello,
Experimenting with an Apache Proxy, I noticed that in version 1.3 (the latest
cvs snapshot) it behaves in a half-duplex fashion. That is, it doesn't read the
backend server response until it have finished transmitting the client's
request body. This is pretty annoying, mainly if the
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 01:03:03AM +0100, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
The following patch reverts to the previous and documented
bevahiour (exhibited by 1.3). Currently !--exec cmd
does not work with suexec enabled as the proc.c will try to
run : shell -c suexec uid gid ... so on.
snip patch
I don't know if this will actually work, haven't fully considered all failure
possibilities. I think there are better implementations of the basic idea. Need to use
atomic increment/decrement and replace the yield() call with pthread_yield() or
whatever...
Bill
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I don't know if this will actually work, haven't fully considered all failure
possibilities. I think there are better implementations of the basic idea. Need to use
atomic increment/decrement and replace the yield() call with pthread_yield() or
whatever...
Bill
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I don't know if this will actually work, haven't fully considered all failure
possibilities. I think there are better implementations of the basic idea. Need to
use
atomic increment/decrement and replace the yield() call with pthread_yield() or
whatever...
Bill
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 01:31:06PM -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Yep this is a problem. I believe the pthread spec states that the cond_wait can be
spuriously triggered.
I'm pretty sure it does, which is why we always check for the condition
when we wake up and go right back to sleep if the
Here is another pass at it, starting with some of Justin's code but
trying to work out a more agreeable place for some of the function.
This puts the -k parsing in a rewrite_args hook (one for the Unix MPMs
is implemented in mpm_common.c) and puts the actual signalling code in
an optional
From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 01:31:06PM -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Yep this is a problem. I believe the pthread spec states that the
cond_wait can be
spuriously triggered.
I'm pretty sure it does, which is why we always check for the
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 01:31:06PM -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Yep this is a problem. I believe the pthread spec states that the
cond_wait can be
spuriously triggered.
I'm pretty sure it does,
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 01:50:44PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Right. pthread_yield seems to be a non-portable extension, if I'm reading
right. From /usr/include/pthread.h on Linux:
#ifdef __USE_GNU
/* Yield the processor to another thread or process.
This function is similar to the
On 22 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim 02/05/22 07:15:28
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
Not a showstopper but something Martin has expressed an interest
in seeing resolved in 1.3.25
Revision ChangesPath
1.999 +6 -4 apache-1.3/STATUS
RELEASE
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
The reason it's not implemented is because it's not guaranteed to do
anything. Yielding is up to the discresion of the underlying system,
and depending on many things it may behave differently. We can not
get predictable scheduling with any variant
Anyone mind if I make the following changes:
- Make subdirectories for flood and apreq and move releases there.
- Rename httpd-2.0.36-win32.zip to httpd-2.0.36-source_only-win32.zip
There seems to be a ton of people downloading the win32.zip, and I imagine
the majority of them are just
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
- Make subdirectories for flood and apreq and move releases there.
+1
- Rename httpd-2.0.36-win32.zip to httpd-2.0.36-source_only-win32.zip
How about just -srconly- or -src- instead of -source_only- ? That's an
awfully long filename. But +1 either
httpd2.0.35
server/protocol.c
Is there any reason why ap_get_basic_auth_pw() rejects
authentication itself if the client provides no Auth line? I can see a
theoretical reason, but it seems to me that the practical reasons not to do
this would outweigh that. If I specify a module or
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 20:06
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
- Make subdirectories for flood and apreq and move releases there.
+1
- Rename httpd-2.0.36-win32.zip to httpd-2.0.36-source_only-win32.zip
How about just -srconly- or
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
CPU since it hits none of the yieldable system calls. On systems that do
true context switching between userspace threads, this doesn't need to
be implemented. It in no way guarantees that the execution will be
yielded, since that's up to the
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 02:14:30PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
If it isn't guaranteed to do something but is rather just a hint, that's
fine, as long as it's documented. But we should still make an attempt to
honor the hint if the underlying system will let us.
[For example, I know my
Yes it was! This should have been committed awhile ago (I
thought it had!) :/
At 1:56 PM -0400 5/22/02, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On 22 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim 02/05/22 07:15:28
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
Not a showstopper but something Martin has expressed an
Doug MacEachern wrote:
httpd links in expat, perl extension links against a different version of
expat. both have the same symbol names, and they are not binary
compatible. perl extension resolves symbols to the httpd version.
kaboom. its been an issue for years with 1.3, you'll find
Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
Euh... we switched over to a shared library to specifically fix this
problem. Are you saying that that didn't work? I'm not buying it... :-)
sooo, i guess the answer to my question on how to disable expat is
you can't ?
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 01:59:02PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
The reason it's not implemented is because it's not guaranteed to do
anything. Yielding is up to the discresion of the underlying system,
and depending on many things it may
At 01:00 PM 5/22/2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
Anyone mind if I make the following changes:
- Make subdirectories for flood and apreq and move releases there.
Sounds Cool.
- Rename httpd-2.0.36-win32.zip to httpd-2.0.36-source_only-win32.zip
Allow me to make some changes first.
There seems to be
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Greg Ames wrote:
Which release of httpd? 1.3 has a Configure rule to turn off expat.
right. i'm asking about 2.0 (my original message specified)
On Wed, 22 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
There seems to be a ton of people downloading the win32.zip, and I imagine
the majority of them are just confusing themselves.
I've seen far fewer complaints since .36 when I rewrote the first few sentences
about what the downloads are.
On 22 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 02/05/22 13:13:08
Modified:.HEADER.html
Log:
Attempt to cool off download hell. Simplify the HEADER to just what
we MUST state up front, so folks will take the time to read it.
Not to discourage you, but I
In 1.3 we did not need to specify a drive letter
for ServerRoot and DocumentRoot paths but in 2.0
it appears we must specify the drive letter or Apache
will not start as a service. (note: the 2.0.36 .msi
install sets the drive letter so this limitation is
not immediately apparent to those
At 03:28 PM 5/22/2002, Joshua wrote:
On 22 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 02/05/22 13:13:08
Modified:.HEADER.html
Log:
Attempt to cool off download hell. Simplify the HEADER to just what
we MUST state up front, so folks will take the time to
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 02:22:03PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
...
- Rename httpd-2.0.36-win32.zip to httpd-2.0.36-source_only-win32.zip
Allow me to make some changes first.
Um. How is httpd-2.0.36-win32.zip different from the .tar.gz ? In other
words, if we're talking about source
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
Um. How is httpd-2.0.36-win32.zip different from the .tar.gz ? In other
words, if we're talking about source distributions, then why isn't it simply
httpd-2.0.36.zip ?
DOS-friendly CRLF line endings in the source files.
If your cwd is on another
volume, that's a problem. This hurts services, since the cwd will
always be c:\winnt\system32\.
Yep, was installed on a non-C: drive
I suggest we cwd to the server root on startup. We can do this
in the winnt_mpm, or for all platforms in main(). Opinions?
+1
At 04:52 PM 5/22/2002, you wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 02:22:03PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
...
- Rename httpd-2.0.36-win32.zip to httpd-2.0.36-source_only-win32.zip
Allow me to make some changes first.
Um. How is httpd-2.0.36-win32.zip different from the .tar.gz ? In other
And Josh and I are suggesting we add -src to the end of every package name
in the source distro directory.
+1
-aaron
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/22 18:06:38 $]
Release:
1.3.25-dev: In development
A release is proposed for end of May 2002. Jim
volunteers to be RM.
1.3.24: Tagged Mar 21, 2002.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/22 05:56:43 $]
Release:
2.0.37 : in development.
2.0.36 : released May 6, 2002 as GA.
2.0.35 : released April 5, 2002 as GA.
2.0.34 : tagged March 26, 2002.
2.0.33
At 06:37 PM 5/22/2002, you wrote:
If your cwd is on another
volume, that's a problem. This hurts services, since the cwd will
always be c:\winnt\system32\.
Yep, was installed on a non-C: drive
I suggest we cwd to the server root on startup. We can do this
in the winnt_mpm, or for
45 matches
Mail list logo
