Share data between servers

2002-08-12 Thread Sébastien Bonnegent
Hi, Is there a way to share data (in my case a apr_array_header_t) between all the httpd process ? I have to use it to provide single sign-on functionality with the proxy module. I have to store some informations about old requests from all httpd process (true and virtual). Thank you

Re: HTTP headers on 'trailing slash' redirects?

2002-08-12 Thread Phil Stoneman
Monday, August 12, 2002, 9:09:01 AM, you wrote: Phil Stoneman says: Now, my problem is this: Apache(1.3.26) is sending 301 (HTTP_MOVED_PERMANENTLY) when it does the 'trailing slash' redirects to contruct a valid URI for a directory. This is technically not against the RFC from what I can

user field of conn-rec in change from apache 13 to 20

2002-08-12 Thread Harrie Hazewinkel
HI, Can someone point me to the equivalent in the Apache 2.0.x versions of the user field that was in the Apache 1.3.x in hte conn_rec?? thanks by advance, Harrie

server push CGI problem

2002-08-12 Thread Michael Weiser
Hi, I've got an update problem regarding apache 1.3.24/2.0.39 and a home-grown server-push webcam CGI. The CGI continuously reads images from the cam, compresses them into JPEGs and puts them together into a multipart/x-mixed-replace stream to produce a poor-man's video with netscape-browsers.

Re: Share data between servers

2002-08-12 Thread Sébastien Bonnegent
Graham Leggett wrote: GL Sébastien Bonnegent wrote: GL GL Is there a way to share data (in my case a apr_array_header_t) GL between all the httpd process ? GL GL I have to use it to provide single sign-on functionality with GL the proxy module. I have to store some informations

Re: user field of conn-rec in change from apache 13 to 20

2002-08-12 Thread Jeff Trawick
Harrie Hazewinkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can someone point me to the equivalent in the Apache 2.0.x versions of the user field that was in the Apache 1.3.x in hte conn_rec?? They were moved to the request_rec. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Re: Share data between servers

2002-08-12 Thread Graham Leggett
Sébastien Bonnegent wrote: I want to make a transparent proxy where the client only have to give an authentification the first time for a domain and after the proxy gives the authentification for the others domains. In this system, the auth system must recognize the Basic and the Digest

Re: Share data between servers

2002-08-12 Thread Sébastien Bonnegent
Graham Leggett wrote: GL Sébastien Bonnegent wrote: GL I want to make a transparent proxy where the client only GL have to give an authentification the first time for a domain GL and after the proxy gives the authentification for the others GL domains. In this system, the auth system

[PATCH] handling ErrorDocument failures

2002-08-12 Thread Greg Ames
There have been a number of glitches with our canned error message support (ap_send_error_response) which are caused by us trying to use two different request_recs to send them, believe it or not. We get into this situation when an ErrorDocument specifies an internal redirect to a bad URI.

Re: Share data between servers

2002-08-12 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Sbastien Bonnegent wrote: A client connect to www.example1.com, and provide an authentification. Later, the same client connect to www.example2.com without give again an authentification. How is that not a security problem? Let's say we then have

Re: Share data between servers

2002-08-12 Thread Sébastien Bonnegent
Cliff Woolley wrote: CW On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Sbastien Bonnegent wrote: CW CW A client connect to www.example1.com, and provide an authentification. CW Later, the same client connect to www.example2.com without give again CW an authentification. CW CW How is that not a security

2.0.40 Win32 binary packages borked

2002-08-12 Thread Cliff Woolley
The .msi and .exe installers for 2.0.40 are borked... lots of default stuff (license, etc), and the registry keys created are apparently for 2.0.39 instead of 2.0.40 (or so says one of the several PR's on the matter). How soon can these be rebuilt? Should I pull the broken installers in the

RE: 2.0.40 Win32 binary packages borked

2002-08-12 Thread Bill Stoddard
The .msi and .exe installers for 2.0.40 are borked... lots of default stuff (license, etc), and the registry keys created are apparently for 2.0.39 instead of 2.0.40 (or so says one of the several PR's on the matter). How soon can these be rebuilt? Should I pull the broken installers in

RE: [PATCH] Workaround for bogobrowsers

2002-08-12 Thread Bill Stoddard
+1 Some browsers have an unusual breakage: when they receive a redirect, and the redirect response's content-type includes a charset, they remember the charset and apply it to the target of the redirection -- overriding any charset the target's response specifies. This gets tickled when

Re: [PATCH] Workaround for bogobrowsers

2002-08-12 Thread Joshua Slive
Jim Jagielski wrote: By the by, do we have a canonical list of such env-vars currently is use? Last I checked, the doccos were somewhat dated and sparse. The canonical list is here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/env.html#special (and similarly for 2.0) But I believe that some of the recent

Re: [PATCH] Workaround for bogobrowsers

2002-08-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
Joshua Slive wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: By the by, do we have a canonical list of such env-vars currently is use? Last I checked, the doccos were somewhat dated and sparse. The canonical list is here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/env.html#special (and similarly for 2.0) But I

Re: user field of conn-rec in change from apache 13 to 20

2002-08-12 Thread Ryan Bloom
The user field is in the request_rec now, because users are a request-based entity in HTTP. Ryan On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: HI, Can someone point me to the equivalent in the Apache 2.0.x versions of the user field that was in the Apache 1.3.x in hte conn_rec??

different module building semantics

2002-08-12 Thread Aryeh Katz
In order to build the non-standard modules, configure requires a command line option of the form --enable-module-name. The problem with this (other than being unable to use the --enable-module=) syntax, is that you can't choose to build as a shared library. This causes much work in order add a

Re: different module building semantics

2002-08-12 Thread Ian Holsman
Aryeh Katz wrote: In order to build the non-standard modules, configure requires a command line option of the form --enable-module-name. The problem with this (other than being unable to use the --enable-module=) syntax, is that you can't choose to build as a shared library. This causes

Re: different module building semantics

2002-08-12 Thread Aryeh Katz
Aryeh Katz wrote: In order to build the non-standard modules, configure requires a command line option of the form --enable-module-name. The problem with this (other than being unable to use the --enable-module=) syntax, is that you can't choose to build as a shared library. This

Re: different module building semantics

2002-08-12 Thread Ian Holsman
Aryeh Katz wrote: Aryeh Katz wrote: In order to build the non-standard modules, configure requires a command line option of the form --enable-module-name. The problem with this (other than being unable to use the --enable-module=) syntax, is that you can't choose to build as a shared library.

Why can't ap_send_error_response() count on charset?

2002-08-12 Thread Carlo Perassi
Hi all. In modules/http/http_protocol.c the comment say ap_send_error_response is used for any response that can be generated by the server from the request record. This includes all [snip] messages that have not been redirected to another handler via the ErrorDocument feature. On line 2331 I

Re: different module building semantics

2002-08-12 Thread Aryeh Katz
I was referring to modules that are in the experimental directory... you mean something like --enable-cache=shared doesn't work for you? I used --enable-shared=all to force shared libraries. That's what I meant in my original post about different module building semantics. Once I set it

RE: [PATCH] Workaround for bogobrowsers

2002-08-12 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
yes please ! +1 redirect, and the redirect response's content-type includes a charset, they remember the charset and apply it to the target of the redirection -- overriding any charset the target's response specifies. This gets tickled when the redirect is coming out of any

Re: QNX 6.1a mod/peer review

2002-08-12 Thread Igor Kovalenko
Anyone? ping! Or should i resumbit once a week as Justin suggested once ;) - Original Message - From: Igor Kovalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 2:24 PM Subject: Re: QNX 6.1a mod/peer review Was that applied or not? Does not seem to be in