Several people reported problems with the same test in mod_perl 2.0.
Only now I've figured why: they run the test suite while logged as
'root', which was absolutly non-obvious.
When this happens Apache::Test starts the server under user 'nobody' if
such exists, or dies otherwise. When the
--On Monday, December 2, 2002 8:44 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about using this for the stable tree?
To merge something from dev to stable (or fix it in stable if the
fix is specific to stable):
either
three committers (including submitter) state their approval
Well, I appreciate that, and apologize if it was a bad thing.
As to why in stable... This wasn't a major change. It doesn't
change the build output, and enabled a new way to build which I and at
least some others think is important. That is, I think
that--particularly for the stable
Currently, mod_proxy falls down if a filter is in the input chain
that changes the content of the original request. It will send the
original Content-Length not the size of the data it actually sends.
If the request was originally chunked, but the data it actually sends
isn't chunked (it sends no
Eric,
apachectl start gives the following error:
[Sun Dec 01 22:45:39 2002] [crit] (22)Invalid argument: make_sock: for address
0.0.0.0:443, apr_socket_opt_set: (IPV6_V6ONLY)
no listening sockets available, shutting down
Unable to open logs
if you still have above problem, try the patch
[CCing apr-dev because it looks like an apr problem.]
It looks like it might be a problem with revision 1.62 or apr
sockopt.c. I'll be out of town all day today, but tomorrow if
no one has gotten to it i'll see if i can come up with a patch.
revision 1.62
date: 2002/11/13 23:47:29; author:
Eric Gillespie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[CCing apr-dev because it looks like an apr problem.]
It looks like it might be a problem with revision 1.62 or apr
sockopt.c. I'll be out of town all day today, but tomorrow if
no one has gotten to it i'll see if i can come up with a patch.
As Mr.
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:09:55 -0800, Wilfredo Sánchez wrote:
Yuck OK. $ is used for the ApacheCoreOS2.def, though I suppose that
only matters for OS/2. I won't touch it.
That should be fine as only gnu make is used to build on OS/2. There's
another problem though that breaks the OS/2 build
On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 23:24:46 +1000 (EST), Brian Havard wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:09:55 -0800, Wilfredo Sánchez wrote:
Yuck OK. $ is used for the ApacheCoreOS2.def, though I suppose that
only matters for OS/2. I won't touch it.
That should be fine as only gnu make is used to build on
Currently, mod_proxy falls down if a filter is in the input chain
that changes the content of the original request. It will send the
original Content-Length not the size of the data it actually sends.
If the request was originally chunked, but the data it actually sends
isn't chunked (it
don't know whether it makes sense in general, but it just makes sense for
me ;-) Instead of generating a unique id for *every* request, it seems
better to give the user the possibility of restricting it to some files
(cgi-scripts etc.)
The attached patch works for me, but I'm not sure, that I
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 05:04, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Currently, mod_proxy falls down if a filter is in the input chain
that changes the content of the original request. It will send the
original Content-Length not the size of the data it actually sends.
If the request was originally chunked,
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 05:44, Jeff Trawick wrote:
How about using this for the stable tree?
To merge something from dev to stable (or fix it in stable if the fix
is specific to stable):
either
three committers (including submitter) state their approval
or
four days
As far as the APU-APR changes go on NetWare, the net result is the same for us.
Since we don't have autoconf on NetWare, this requires us to have our own version of
apr_ldap.h (ie. apr_ldap.hnw) just like the Windows platform. But unlike Windows and
Unix, we don't have to support different
Hi to all,
Do you know where I could find Apache 2.0.43 binaries
with SSL support for Windows ?
Regards
At 10:34 AM 12/3/2002, Brad Nicholes wrote:
As far as the APU-APR changes go on NetWare, the net result is the same for us.
Since we don't have autoconf on NetWare, this requires us to have our own version of
apr_ldap.h (ie. apr_ldap.hnw) just like the Windows platform. But unlike Windows and
If Netware or Win32 can 'conditionally' support ldap, then we need
to consider having an apr_ldap.hxx file that contains all of the
#define APR_HAS_LDAP_* 0 statements. The header should
always exist, and inform the app if ldap is available.
Of course, I'm expecting that Win32 will support LDAP
Hello! Wondering if anyone is working on/interested in a module that
wraps the ImageMagick functionality? I'm thinking it would be used as
such:
IMG SRC=/images/blah.gif?im=rot|90;size|100x100|
This would rotate the image 90 degrees and size it to 100x100 before
delivery. For
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Michael Montero wrote:
Hello! Wondering if anyone is working on/interested in a module that
wraps the ImageMagick functionality? I'm thinking it would be used as
such:
IMG SRC=/images/blah.gif?im=rot|90;size|100x100|
Just as a hint, mod_ext_filter and mod_cache in
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
regenerated every single time. Given those two, I bet you could get this
functionality having to actually write a new module. :)
Um, I seem to have lost a WITHOUT in there somewhere. ;]
--Cliff
I know Gerald Richter has a mod_perl module that does what you are describing.
might be worth a peek.
perldoc Apache::ImageMagick
sterling
Cliff, thanks for the reply. I read this:
mod_ext_filter presents a simple and familiar programming model for
filters. With this module, a program which reads from stdin and writes to
stdout (i.e., a Unix-style
filter command) can be a filter for Apache. This filtering mechanism is
much
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Currently, mod_proxy falls down if a filter is in the input chain
that changes the content of the original request. It will send the
original Content-Length not the size of the data it actually sends.
If the request was originally chunked, but the data it actually sends
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Michael Montero wrote:
My main concern would be with how expensive ImageMagick calls can be and
the need to call both mogrify and convert (in my experience) to get a
single thing done to an image. I would much rather read an image into
memory and then perform a host of
Completely understand. Of course, the fun part IS the development! :)
Perhaps I should defer to the list or anyone else that wants to chime in?
I suspect most users of any such module would prefer to put a cache in
front of itthis just makes the most sense to me.
Anyone else care to
At 12:35 PM 12/3/2002, Andre Schild wrote:
Under win32 there is no guarantee that a ldap library is available.
For compiling/linking the apache with ldap support under win32
you will need a third party ldap library.
Or Microsofts'. Your point?
It's actually harmless [in Win32] to build
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:48:53PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux (2.4.18 and 2.4.19, for me anyway) with apache versions
2.0.40 to 2.0.43 (that I've tested anyways) is broken with
TCP_CORK and IPv6. Bizarrely v6 requests will work the first
Colm MacCarthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:48:53PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux (2.4.18 and 2.4.19, for me anyway) with apache versions
2.0.40 to 2.0.43 (that I've tested anyways) is broken with
28 matches
Mail list logo
