Re: STATUS mailings for stable httpd 2.0

2002-12-05 Thread TOKILEY
Justin wrote ( RE: Apache STATUS files )... Oh, I hate to get more email that I just delete as soon as it comes in Does anyone actually read these things though? Yes.

Should mod_proxy abort when browser aborts?

2002-12-05 Thread Tikka, Sami
Another thing I have been oogling is proxy_http.c line 946 where the HTTP response is passed to proxy output filters: if (ap_pass_brigade(r-output_filters, bb) != APR_SUCCESS) { /* Ack! Phbtt! Die! User aborted! */ p_conn-close = 1; /* this causes socket close below */ finish

Re: Linux + TCP_CORK + IPv6 = Broken [PATCH]

2002-12-05 Thread Colm MacCárthaigh
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:16:02AM +, Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:38:06PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:05:21PM +, Joe Orton wrote: Colm, can you try running the apr/test/sendfile binary with your machines? It was one of the first

Re: Linux + TCP_CORK + IPv6 = Broken [PATCH]

2002-12-05 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:54:53AM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: .. telnet [v6addr] 80 GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: madeup.tld observe lack of response Have you verified with tcpdump/ethereal etc that this hang is because the server is not sending the packets? What does netstat -t show for this

Re: Linux + TCP_CORK + IPv6 = Broken [PATCH]

2002-12-05 Thread Colm MacCárthaigh
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:30:29AM +, Joe Orton wrote: On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:54:53AM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: .. telnet [v6addr] 80 GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: madeup.tld observe lack of response Have you verified with tcpdump/ethereal etc that this hang is because the

RE: Linux + TCP_CORK + IPv6 = Broken [PATCH]

2002-12-05 Thread Jeroen Massar
Colm MacCárthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:58:48PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: I'm using vanilla 2.4.18, from Debian kernel-source-2.4.18 , one machine has the broadcom bcm5700 module, and the the other has the intel e1000 module. O.k., more

[PATCH] Re: Broken find usage in server/Makefile.in (HEAD and APACHE_2_0_BRANCH)

2002-12-05 Thread Eric Gillespie
Eric Gillespie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tmp=export_files_unsorted.txt; rm -f $tmp touch $tmp; for dir in /usr/lo cal/apache2/src/include /usr/local/apache2/src/os/S_DIR PR_INCLUDEDIR PU_INCL UDEDIR /usr/local/apache2/src/modules/http; do find $dir -maxdepth 1 -type f -name '*.h' $tmp;

Re: [PATCH] Re: Broken find usage in server/Makefile.in (HEAD and APACHE_2_0_BRANCH)

2002-12-05 Thread Thom May
* Eric Gillespie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Eric Gillespie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tmp=export_files_unsorted.txt; rm -f $tmp touch $tmp; for dir in /usr/lo cal/apache2/src/include /usr/local/apache2/src/os/S_DIR PR_INCLUDEDIR PU_INCL UDEDIR /usr/local/apache2/src/modules/http; do

Re: Linux + TCP_CORK + IPv6 = Broken [PATCH]

2002-12-05 Thread Colm MacCárthaigh
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:17:53PM +, Joe Orton wrote: To summarize some off-list dicussion - the kernel guys have said that using sendfile on IPv6 sockets may trigger bugs in cards which do hardware TCP checksumming for card/driver/OS combinations which support that. (since the cards have

Re: Should mod_proxy abort when browser aborts?

2002-12-05 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Thursday, December 5, 2002 11:35 AM +0200 Tikka, Sami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should the check for conn-aborted flag be added into proxy_http.c? No, I'd prefer not. The core_output_filter should be returning the error code. The fact that it is returning APR_SUCCESS when there was an

Re: IPv6 breakage on NetBSD

2002-12-05 Thread Eric Gillespie
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unfortunately, I did not apply the patch to APACHE_2_0_BRANCH until last night. Please update server/listen.c to pick up the fix and report back. IMHO we shouldn't release 2.0.44 without this issue resolved. While I'm sure the patch fixes it, it would

2_0_BRANCH tree status

2002-12-05 Thread Sander Striker
Hi, So many commits lately I'm having trouble keeping track. If I were to tag 2_0_44_PRE1 now, would I be leaving anything important out (apart from the IPv6 TCP_CORK fix)? Is there more reverting/fixing to do on the aaa front (Japanese docs)? Thanks, Sander

Re: 2_0_BRANCH tree status

2002-12-05 Thread André Malo
* Sander Striker wrote: So many commits lately I'm having trouble keeping track. sorry ;-) Is there more reverting/fixing to do on the aaa front (Japanese docs)? I won't touch the japanese files, since I would produce weird results, that I can't verify. However, if nobody else does the

Re: 2_0_BRANCH tree status

2002-12-05 Thread Brian Havard
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:11:41 +0100, Sander Striker wrote: So many commits lately I'm having trouble keeping track. If I were to tag 2_0_44_PRE1 now, would I be leaving anything important out (apart from the IPv6 TCP_CORK fix)? Is there more reverting/fixing to do on the aaa front (Japanese docs)?