Ok, these are whittling away. APR is hashing out the very last obstacles to
0.9.2 and those should be done in the next day or few.
I plan to lay down the -rc1 tag of httpd-2.0.45 just as soon at 0.9.2-rc1 is ready.
I have only three patches myself, first to change .dbgmark to .dbr (because
we
I have put the version(0.0.3) with these and a couple over small changes on
http://open.cyanworlds.com
Compiles and Works for me gov.
Few minor nits below. Feel free to ignore. Nothing major.
mysql_init can return a NULL; are we sure that mysql_close is thread safe
? And I'd make the
Hi,
Would there be a way to get ride of the following problem:
+++
httpd: module ../../server/apache2/mod_jk2.c is not compatible with this
version of Apache (found 20020903, need 20030213).
Please contact the vendor for the correct version.
+++
In include/ap_mmn.h we have:
+++
* 20020612
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Would there be a way to get ride of the following problem:
+++
httpd: module ../../server/apache2/mod_jk2.c is not compatible with
this version of Apache (found 20020903, need 20030213).
Please contact the vendor for the correct version.
That looks like a change
How can a user add to LDFLAGS_SHLIB?
I tried setting LDFLAGS_SHLIB outside of configure, but that replaced
the necessary AIX additions specified in src/Configure.
I tried setting EXTRA_LDFLAGS_SHLIB but that was ignored as far as I
could tell.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Would there be a way to get ride of the following problem:
+++
httpd: module ../../server/apache2/mod_jk2.c is not compatible with
this version of Apache (found 20020903, need 20030213).
Please contact the vendor for the correct version.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
2.0.39 versus 2.0.41+ tells (found 20020612, need 20020903) ;-)
2.0.45 will be 20020903, won't it?
Absolutely...
2.0.x will maintain compatibility as long as it is practical (which
hopefully is the entire maintained life of 2.0.x).
Jeff Trawick wrote:
How can a user add to LDFLAGS_SHLIB?
I tried setting LDFLAGS_SHLIB outside of configure, but that replaced
the necessary AIX additions specified in src/Configure.
I tried setting EXTRA_LDFLAGS_SHLIB but that was ignored as far as I
could tell.
src/Configure is
--On Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:06 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that was overkill. However, why put anything on the
contributors web page? I believe that information exists right
there, in the KEYS file, as to who signed a given release, with our
email
Ahhh... verification between project RMs of one another's tarballs?
Then don't plug this into KEYS and raise awareness (our workload)
to insurmountable levels. Let's start a wiki^H^H^H^Hdoc page all about
release signatures and PGP. Explain in a nutshell what is signed, why
it is signed and how
DW mysql_init can return a NULL;
Added a check for this in 0.0.5 ( now on http://open.cyanworlds.com )
DW are we sure that mysql_close is
DW thread safe ?
According the MySQL Website and documentaion, only
mysql_real_connect/mysql_connect are not thread safe.
DW And I'd make the psprintf's
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Paul Querna wrote:
DW mysql_init can return a NULL;
According the MySQL Website and documentaion, only
mysql_real_connect/mysql_connect are not thread safe.
Ack - I had a bang around the close - must have been something else.
I can't find any function called
This seg fault occurs sporadically on the FIRST SSL hit to
the server immediatly after startup. Subsequent hits to SSL
do not have a problem.
This occurs only with this in the conf:
SSLSessionCache shmht:/usr/local/apache/ssl/ssl_cache
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Adam Sussman wrote:
SSLSessionCache shmht:/usr/local/apache/ssl/ssl_cache
Didn't Madhu say that shmht was horribly broken and should be removed? I
don't quite remember.
--Cliff
Cliff Woolley wrote:
Didn't Madhu say that shmht was horribly broken and should be removed? I
don't quite remember.
sounds like the shared mem stuff in mod_auth_digest :)
I have been having problems with shmht (haven't looked into it for ages). Do
you get the same problem even with shmcb ?.
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Adam Sussman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Seg Fault on first SSL
[ Moved from another list... ]
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:24 PM +1100 Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused about the branches naming. Is the following correct:
You're not the only one. I suggested a long time ago renaming the
trees (when we did this whole mess), but
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nd 2003/02/18 19:01:21
Modified:.CHANGES
support apxs.in
Log:
insert LoadModule directives only outside of sections.
PR: 9012
Hmm, I'm unsure. Is it desired to backport such changes? I'm asking,
because the
Hi Paul,
I have put an updated version of mod_auth_mysql onto
http://open.cyanworlds.com/
Changes from Initial Release:
+ Removed evil signal() calls
+ Changed Config Style
+ Added Database Pooling
+ Added Multiple Database Connections
+ General Cleanup
TODO:
- Make Database Pool Size
Gunter, presume you just forgot a cc-to, but this discussion belongs
on the dev@apr list, so I'm copying it here. You are right, the DECLARE
macros are manditory.
Certain to commit for 0.9.2, but your completed patch based on that
DECLARE assumption would speed things up :-)
Bill
At 10:03 PM
This ia an apache-1.3 issue
Richard Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] has reported the following segfault on the
modperl list. The following patch tries to prevent the segfault:
Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
0x80b445b in ap_unescape_url (url=0x8162e89 ) at util.c:1609
1609url[x] =
this one could be taken from an OS lib:
mod_authn_mysql.obj : error LNK2001: Nichtaufgeloestes externes
Symbol __imp__tmpnam but I think you should better use here
APR_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_file_mktemp(apr_file_t **fp, char
*templ, apr_int32_t
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:07 AM +0100 André Malo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nd 2003/02/18 19:01:21
Modified:.CHANGES
support apxs.in
Log:
insert LoadModule directives only outside of sections.
PR: 9012
Hmm, I'm
I'd just like to point out that wading through hundreds of CLOSED reports
is a PITA for those of us who track Bugzilla incidents through email.
...a PITA only surpassed by some enterprising contributor who is willing
to wade through the reports and CLOSE those that are truly done and gone.
Stas Bekman wrote:
This ia an apache-1.3 issue
please disregard this one for now. I couldn't reproduce the problem and
based the possible solution on the posted backtrace, but it looks like
it's not what's happenning. I'll follow up after I dig more into this.
Richard Clarke [EMAIL
... gives me these errors at the end of the build process
copy Debug\Apache.dbg \Apache2\symbols\exe .y
The system cannot find the specified file.
NMAKE: fatal error U1077: 'copy': Return-Code '0x1'
Stop.
NMAKE: fatal error U1077:
'C:\Programme\Microsoft Visual
how did you get the source code?
make sure you are fixing the CL/LF endings for Unix 2 win32
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:01:20 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote
... gives me these errors at the end of the build process
copy Debug\Apache.dbg \Apache2\symbols\exe .y
The system cannot find
27 matches
Mail list logo
