httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/03/09 05:22:48 $]
Stuff to do:
* finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if
framework failed)
* change existing tests that frob the DocumentRoot (e.g.,
flood STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/09/06 10:24:42 $]
Release:
1.0: Released July 23, 2002
milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002
ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001
milestone-02: Tagged August 13,
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/03/09 05:22:48 $]
Stuff to do:
* finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if
framework failed)
* change existing tests that frob the DocumentRoot (e.g.,
Our group is involved in expanding the Flood model to test parts of a page
in parallel. As Flood seems to rely more on the multithreading model than
on parallel processes (the build logic will go that way as long as the
support is found in the APR as built on the current operating system, and
the
Jeff Trawick wrote:
This is Justin's suggested logic from an earlier thread, with some minor
tweaks.
Applying this patch to the 2.0.45 tarball allowed binbuild.sh to create
a binary distribution on Linux. Prior to this change, apr configuration
would bail because it didn't support a layout
At 9:11 PM + 4/2/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -2067,12 +2098,12 @@
splitout_queryargs(r, p-flags RULEFLAG_QSAPPEND);
/*
- * Again add the previously stripped per-directory location
- * prefix if the new URI is not a new one for this
- * location,
* Jim Jagielski wrote:
At 9:11 PM + 4/2/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -2067,12 +2098,12 @@
splitout_queryargs(r, p-flags RULEFLAG_QSAPPEND);
/*
- * Again add the previously stripped per-directory location
- * prefix if the new URI is not a new one for this
--On Thursday, April 3, 2003 7:04 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just got our first PR on this, so I've committed it to 2.1-dev, suggested
it for merge in APACHE_2_0_BRANCH/STATUS, and mentioned the patch in
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.0.45/
(My
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
FWIW, I would have put the logic into APR_SUBDIR_CONFIG by adding a
third parameter that lists what options to drop before calling the
subdir's configure. This way the logic can be abstracted by the calling
functions. This would make it a little bit easier and cleaner
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/03/19 15:27:51 $]
Release:
1.3.28-dev: In development. Jim proposes a release on or
before April 1, 2003 and offers to be RM.
1.3.27: Tagged September 30, 2002.
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/03/07 20:24:07 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related
Hi all,
I've attached a patch for the current head of CVS that represents the
latest state of distcache support. This includes the autoconf hooks so
that, if mod_ssl is configured to be built, distcache support will be
probed for and enabled if found. If --enable-distcache is specified then
The following message came into the moderation queue for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bringing to this list for any followup past my own.
Patrick: yes, we *do* intend to continue maintenance for 1.3. There will
probably continue to be some minor feature work, but 1.3 is mostly about
maintenance [including
FYI:
When compiling 2.0.45 on AIX 4.3.3 I am getting
loads of Informational messages like (but not limited to):
1506-304 (I) No function prototype given for _Errno
1506-304 (I) No function prototype given for strcasecmp
1506-304 (I) No function prototype given for
Bennett, Tony - CNF wrote:
FYI:
When compiling 2.0.45 on AIX 4.3.3 I am getting
loads of Informational messages like (but not limited to):
I shouldn't have turned this on (-qinfo=pro) except for
--enable-maintainer-mode because of the _Errno issue. Sorry :(
1506-304 (I) No function
Hi All,
I have failed to compile 2.0.45 on Solaris 9, 8, and 7. The errors are the
same for 9 8. Any hope getting this resolved soon? I need to upgrade
from .44 to .45 for reason of security.
Sincerely,
Jie
Jie Gao wrote:
I have failed to compile 2.0.45 on Solaris 9, 8, and 7. The errors are the
same for 9 8. Any hope getting this resolved soon? I need to upgrade
from .44 to .45 for reason of security.
I just posted some questions to that PR that may help shed some light on
the problem, but it may
I started seeing a lot of these in the 2.0.45 build:
(22)Invalid argument: apr_socket_opt_set(SO_RCVBUF): Failed to set
ProxyReceiveBufferSize, using default
I dug into this and discovered to my suprise that the APR never implemented SO_RCVBUF
for the unix platform. Previous versions of the
Sorry... but -1. You need a version check here because 0.9.6 isn't
going away anytime soon.
Bill
At 09:57 PM 4/3/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick 2003/04/03 19:57:10
Modified:.CHANGES
modules/ssl mod_ssl.h ssl_engine_kernel.c
Log:
Fix a compile
19 matches
Mail list logo
