Geoffrey Young wrote:
I needed to make the following changes in order to get the
perl-framework running with Apache 2.1, which is now upated for APR
1.0. I went back and checked 2.0.39 and both the symbols are there, so
the changes are good at least that far back. I guess we need to decide
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
[ .. ]
It should work during 'make test' as well, since it already runs t/TEST
-config. And also whenever you provide any options to t/TEST it reconfigures,
so I believe the normal run will do
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
[ .. ]
It should work during 'make test' as well, since it already runs t/TEST
-config. And also whenever you provide any options to t/TEST it reconfigures,
so I believe the normal
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
it probably doesn't make any difference if older releases won't work
with it.
+1. As long as the top-of-tree 1.3-dev, 2.0-dev, and 2.1-dev all build
and run, that's fine. Older point releases are not an issue.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Requiring a IKnowIAmOperatingAOpenProxy flag that needs to
be set explicitly would be a better idea then :)
That's what the ProxyRequests directive does. Giving it a
From: Blair Zajac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 7:32 PM
Hello,
Just tried building apr/apr-util and httpd-2.1 from CVS head and got
the following compile error:
[...]
If I manually delete 'include apu_compat.h' from exports.c it
compiles just fine.
Did you
First release of the MySQL authn handlers for Apache 2.1. The Apache
module supports both the normal MySQL server and our embedded server.
http://www.mysql.com/portal/software/item-334.html
-Brian
--
___
Brian Krow Aker, [EMAIL
* Glenn wrote:
1) Why does includes virtual sometimes fail with
unable to include potential exec \%s\ in parsed file %s
when Options IncludesNoEXEC is used? Why is this check performed?
What is the reasoning behind it?
Not to execute anything, as the option name may imply ;-)
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
So perhaps it's time to deprecate req_rec::handler in favor of a handler_fn
or some other sort of hash, and make the handler phase 1:1 on the request?
That sounds like a very good idea to me.
But how would you handle things like handler1 returns DECLINED and
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 12:15:44AM +0200, Andr? Malo wrote:
* Glenn wrote:
1) Why does includes virtual sometimes fail with
unable to include potential exec \%s\ in parsed file %s
when Options IncludesNoEXEC is used? Why is this check performed?
What is the reasoning behind
It's too bad you can't set the ScriptLog in a per-dir context -- that
would allow an individual user (aka myself) to debug their own cgi scripts
into their own error log even though there's no global ScriptLog enabled.
--Cliff
11 matches
Mail list logo