[STATUS] (flood) Wed Nov 5 23:45:53 EST 2003

2003-11-06 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
flood STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/07/01 20:55:12 $] Release: 1.0: Released July 23, 2002 milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002 ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001 milestone-02: Tagged August 13,

[STATUS] (perl-framework) Wed Nov 5 23:45:55 EST 2003

2003-11-06 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/03/09 05:22:48 $] Stuff to do: * finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if framework failed) * change existing tests that frob the DocumentRoot (e.g.,

Problem with ordering of modules in IHS 1x

2003-11-06 Thread Swapan Gupta
Hi, I am having a problem with the ordering of modules with IHS, based upon Apache1x. I have two modules which have their functions scheduled to be executed during the same phase (Check Access). The functions get executed in a reverse order than the one I intend to. The same is true

Re: should input filter return the exact amount of bytes asked for?

2003-11-06 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: I'm trying to get rid of ap_get_client_block(), but I don't understand a few things. ap_get_client_block() asks for readbytes from the upstream filter. What happens if the filter returns less bytes (while there is still more data coming?) What happens if the filter returns

Problem with ordering of modules in IHS 1x

2003-11-06 Thread Swapan Gupta
Hi, I am having a problem with the ordering of modules with IHS, based upon Apache1x. I have two modules which have their functions scheduled to be executed during the same phase (Check Access). The functions get executed in a reverse order than the one I intend to. The same is

Re: Problem with ordering of modules in IHS 1x

2003-11-06 Thread Jeff Trawick
Swapan Gupta wrote: I am having a problem with the ordering of modules with IHS, based upon Apache1x. I have two modules which have their functions scheduled to be executed during the same phase (Check Access). The functions get executed in a reverse order than the one I intend to. The same

RE: Problem with ordering of modules in IHS 1x

2003-11-06 Thread Sander Striker
From: Swapan Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:50 PM Yes, my config file does have ClearModule List and AddModule directives. Moreover, the ordering of LoadModule directives and AddModule directives is in the same as I want it to be, ie., entries for my

Re: sctp related compile errors (resolved, but see last paragraph)

2003-11-06 Thread Joe Orton
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 10:29:58PM -0500, James H.Cloos Jr. wrote: I figured this out shortly after posting ... :( What is happening is that something in the latest glibc or kernel headers (not linked into /usr/include, but glibc was built against the 2.6 kernel and probably grabbed some

module load order

2003-11-06 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, I was just asked again by a user about the load order of modules. While it seems that it is now with Apache2 less important, and also ClearModuleList and AddModule are removed now with Apache2, I think it is at least still important for auth modules. So I searched the manual for any hints,

Re: Problem with ordering of modules in IHS 1x

2003-11-06 Thread Jeff Trawick
Sander Striker wrote: From: Swapan Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:50 PM Then this is not an Apache issue and this question should be asked the IHS1x support team. Yes, I should have said that yet again instead of asking further questions. --/-- If you have

Structure of apache source

2003-11-06 Thread Pedro Picapiedra
I want to know if there's a document about the structure of Apache source, i must change something, and i don't know how start with it. ThanksUna mejor experiencia en Internet. Prueba gratis dos meses MSN 8.

Re: piped log files

2003-11-06 Thread Glenn
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:02:16AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: Bastiaan van der Put wrote: CustomLog |/usr/local/apache2/bin/logresolve /home/accounts/x/x/logs/access_log combined unless somebody speaks up soon, I'll commit the patch to Apache 2.1-dev status:

Re: Structure of apache source

2003-11-06 Thread joe user
--- Pedro Picapiedra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - I want to know if there's a document about the structure of Apache source, i must change something, and i don't know how start with it. This is the file I found on it:

OT: Freebsd 3.4 binaries on 4.8/4.9

2003-11-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
Because I want to provide some FreeBSD binaries of the latest release, and I'm lazy, I need to ask: Will binaries compiled under FreeBSD 3.4 work under 4.8/4.9 ?

Re: OT: Freebsd 3.4 binaries on 4.8/4.9

2003-11-06 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:26:55AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: Because I want to provide some FreeBSD binaries of the latest release, and I'm lazy, I need to ask: Will binaries compiled under FreeBSD 3.4 work under 4.8/4.9 ? The binaries will run, but if they use any kernel structures which

Best place to log error 500 errors

2003-11-06 Thread Andre Schild
Hello, what would be the best way to log all error 500 (all status 50x responses in fact) into a separate logfile ? One way could be a piped log, but depending of the format the user has configured the output can be very different. I think of something like a (transparent) filter in the output

Re: mod_ldap SEGV while caching on FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE

2003-11-06 Thread Jeff Trawick
Matthieu Estrade wrote: Hi Albert, Could you try this little patch posted on bugzilla: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=8185 Matthieu, can you take a look at the attached patch? I replaced a call to unlink() with apr_file_remove(). I also axed a bunch of tab

Re: Sending multiple responses

2003-11-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
12:44 AM 11/6/2003, amit athavale wrote: Hi, Requirement : --- I want to change the mod_dav code so that it sends 102 Processing responses after copying say 5 resources. This is necessary when COPYing or DELETEing large collections.(say depth 20 and total resources = 1. In

DDOS protection features request

2003-11-06 Thread Sergey Ignatchenko
There exists (and I know of several instances when it was successfully used) a trivial kind of DDOS attack that seems to be quite poorly handled by Apache: if multiple clients just create TCP connections to port 80 and do not send anything over those connections, it will take TimeOut (300 sec

Re: DDOS protection features request

2003-11-06 Thread Bill Stoddard
Sergey Ignatchenko wrote: There exists (and I know of several instances when it was successfully used) a trivial kind of DDOS attack that seems to be quite poorly handled by Apache: if multiple clients just create TCP connections to port 80 and do not send anything over those connections, it

Re: Sending multiple responses

2003-11-06 Thread amit athavale
Thanks Bill for the reply. My 2 cents (I am filter novice :) ) We need to create a new metadata bucket to pass on the Continue, or Processing, or other 1xx-style response codes. It needs to be processed by the HTTP filter so that these responses aren't inserted into 1.0 streams, or into the