hi all
I've been thinking about this situation for a while now...
Original Message
Subject: FAIL Apache-Test-1.06 darwin 6.8
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:03:19 +0200 (IST)
!!! no test server configured, please specify an httpd or apxs or put either
in your PATH. For example:
t/TEST
At 07:14 PM 11/10/2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
I have several reasons to believe that the wheel of httpd-dev life is
slowing down and something has to be done to get this wheel up to the
speed like in the good old days. The following observation are listed
in no particular order. I've also tried to
At 07:14 PM 11/10/2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
I have several reasons to believe that the wheel of httpd-dev life is
slowing down and something has to be done to get this wheel up to the
speed like in the good old days. The following observation are listed
in no particular order. I've also tried to
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:41:28AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
I am willing to code much of the cache system if there is signifigant interest
in it.
Sure - 'show me the code.' ;-) -- justin
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:41:46AM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
filter. What happens if the filter returns less bytes (while there is still
more data coming?) What happens if the filter returns more bytes than
requested (e.g. because it uncompressed some data). After all the incoming
Less
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 02:23:44PM +0530, Swapan Gupta wrote:
Hi,
Is Apache2x supported on Sol6?
When I try to build my Apache2 module on Sol6, I get the following
errors from within the apache2 include files:
../../sun/apache2/include/apr.h, line 306: Error: socklen_t is not
defined.
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 05:43:09AM -0800, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
There is also a compile time 'hard' limit: HARD_SERVER_LIMIT which
depending on your platform is set to 256, 1024 or 2048. It can be
overwridden at compile time with something like -DHARD_SERVER_LIMIT=1234.
For completeness
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:28:12PM +0100, Andr Malo wrote:
There's currently no API for modules to determine the unmodified server
version. I'd like to introduce one (and backport to 2.0) -- see
attached patch. Any objections, comments?
No objections here. Yet, perhaps we should add an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 31.10.2003 23:44:06
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Andre Schild wrote:
Please have a look at the following Mozilla bug report
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224296
It seems that mod_deflate does transfer encoding,
but sets the headers as if doing content encoding.
Hi,
following is my virtualhost configuration:
Listen 192.168.0.2:80
NameVirtualHost 192.168.0.2:80
VirtualHost 192.168.0.2
ServerNameabc.mydomain.org
ProxyPass / http://def.mydomain.org/
ProxyPassReverse / http://def.mydomain.org/
/VirtualHost
and the main ip address of
Something else to think about...
What's the differentiator in the market place between 1.x and 2.x?
(hint: it's not a feature list)
If I was to go out and buy Apache (Covalent) apart from some management
tools (features) what's the biggest differentiator between the old version
(public domain
Stas Bekman wrote:
1) Bugs
searching for NEW and REOPENED bugs in httpd-2.0 returns: 420 entries
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEWbug_status=REOPENEDproduct=Apache+httpd-2.0
yes, far too many :(
Suggestion: make bugzilla CC bug-reports to the dev list. Most
Andre Schild wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 31.10.2003 23:44:06
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Andre Schild wrote:
Please have a look at the following Mozilla bug report
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224296
It seems that mod_deflate does transfer encoding,
but sets the headers as if doing
hi,
2d). CRT seemed to come as a replacement for design discussions. It's
very easy to observe from the traffic numbers:
Please excuse the total ignorance of passive Apache-Dev readers, but
these abbreviations were new to me. I've found then im the Apache
Glossary, though, and provide them to
It's not anymore cool to work on Apache.
You nailed it - because no one knows where it's going. Where's the focus,
what does Apache really want to be, whose leading the charge?
I've been following this forum a long, long time and the change in the last
2 years has been the most dramatic - the
hi,
I'm not sure http-dev is the place to flam ASF and its commiters.
I don't think it was Peter's intention to flame anyone. The ASF has done
a great job to deliver a fantastic, widely-deployed webserver.
Consindering though that Apache 2 is mostly a refactored 1.3.x, which
doesn't provide
There is no flame - just a couple of points and a request for data.
If you want to improve something, you should provide solutions,
not critics
Certainly - early next year you will see them. Here are some current
performance stats with some new technology we're working on.
Configuration
* Daniel Lorch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I can get my name into the headlines [1] when writing Java-Stuff,
hell, then I'll do it.
Read The Cathedral The Bazaar from ESR [2]. It provides a good
insight into the social structures of the community: motivations,
incentives, .. It's not
Daniel Lorch a écrit :
hi,
I'm not sure http-dev is the place to flam ASF and its commiters.
I don't think it was Peter's intention to flame anyone. The ASF has done
a great job to deliver a fantastic, widely-deployed webserver.
Consindering though that Apache 2 is mostly a refactored 1.3.x,
Peter J. Cranstone a crit :
There is no flame - just a couple of points and a request for data.
If you want to improve something, you should provide solutions,
not critics
Certainly - early next year you will see them. Here are some current
performance stats with some new technology we're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
Wether I am using Apache 1.3 with mod_auth_ldap 1.6.0 (from Rudedog) or Apache
2.0 with the distributed auth_ldap module (which is, as I understand, based
on the rudedog module), I am experiencing the same problems.
Over at the [EMAIL
Ace Suares wrote:
Wether I am using Apache 1.3 with mod_auth_ldap 1.6.0 (from Rudedog) or Apache
2.0 with the distributed auth_ldap module (which is, as I understand, based
on the rudedog module), I am experiencing the same problems.
BTW, when you reply to a post on some topic and then change
Read The Cathedral The Bazaar from ESR [2]. It provides a good
insight into the social structures of the community: motivations,
incentives, .. It's not always the money, you know ;) Market share?
Who cares! Customers? Who cares! I want my name to be a three letter
acronym everyone
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Andre Schild wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22902
Any ideas on this subject ?
It seems to me that we should only recommend the AddOutputFilterByType
configuration, since compressing everything has too many potential
problems.
I think
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:02:36AM -0700, Peter J. Cranstone wrote:
So, anyone got any hard data that shows Apache 2.x serving pages factors
faster than 1.x?
Yes, plenty :) ftp.heanet.ie serves about 1 million requests, well over
a terabyte of data per day and maintains an average of about
Cahya Wirawan wrote:
Listen 192.168.0.2:80
NameVirtualHost 192.168.0.2:80
VirtualHost 192.168.0.2
ServerNameabc.mydomain.org
ProxyPass / http://def.mydomain.org/
ProxyPassReverse / http://def.mydomain.org/
/VirtualHost
and the main ip address of my interface is
The worst part is that it's now easy to sneak in code which
otherwise
would never be accepted (and backport it to 2.0). I don't have any
examples, but I think the danger is there.
There is a barrier to getting things backported to 2.0 as a protection
against
possible drawbacks of C-T-R.
If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ace Suares wrote:
Wether I am using Apache 1.3 with mod_auth_ldap 1.6.0 (from Rudedog) or
Apache 2.0 with the distributed auth_ldap module (which is, as I
understand, based on the rudedog module), I am experiencing the same
problems.
BTW,
Ace Suares wrote:
BTW, when you reply to a post on some topic and then change the subject, in
many mail clients your post will appear in the thread of that old topic.
That seems to be the case with this new thread.
Hmm... very intersting.
I was not aware that I replied to a post on this list
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 05:14:35PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
3). Contributions
I don't have numbers to support my clause, but I have a strong feeling
that nowadays we see a much smaller number of posts with contributions
from non-developers
More facetious than anything else, I'm going to
At 03:31 AM 11/11/2003, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:41:46AM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
filter. What happens if the filter returns less bytes (while there is still
more data coming?) What happens if the filter returns more bytes than
requested (e.g. because it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oh... thank you for pointing that out. I *might* have done that, I hate typing
emailaddresses :-)
I'll post the article once again, properly.
_Ace
weird... the old thread has subject the wheel of httpd-dev life is surely
slowing down,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Due to a confusing post earlier, which happened to put this message into an
unrelated thread, I am reposting this one. I hope that clears things up. I
changed the subject, too, prefixing 'Q:' to distinguish from the other post.
Hi All,
Wether I
Here is a simple suggestion; does anyone mind if I run CHANGES in 1.3,
2.0 and 2.1 through the following filter?
perl -e while(stdin){s#([^ @]*)@([^ @]*)#$1 $2#g;print $_;}
instead of [William Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]] I end up with something
like [William Rowe wrowe apache.org]
Anyone can
I think we should put a warning on the second recomended configuration
that compressing everything can cause problems. (Specially with PDF files)
Could you file a bug against the documentation for this so it doesn't get
forgotten?
Done.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24614
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
instead of [William Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]] I end up with something
like [William Rowe wrowe apache.org]
fine with me if you remove the @ sign by whatever mechanism... cvs diff can
help you whether or not that one-liner did the trick
Well the http tuning of string handling is a known factor of
optimization
You're right - nothing new about optimizing string handling - just doing it
BTW, if you post these benchmarks on the HTTPd-dev list, should I
assume you'll give ASF your optimized tuned algorithms ?
I wouldn't assume
Thanks for the stat - our environment supports throughputs 1Gbps on a
single processor. Near linear scalability is expected with additional chips
up to 256 CPU's.
I agree with your comments on IPv6 - it's already here - might as well
embrace the horror.
Regards,
Peter
-Original
Hi,
I've tagged the 2.1 tree with STRIKER_2_1_0_PRE3. Hopefully this is the
last tag before the first 2.1 release. Please give it a test run.
Tarballs are at:
http://www.apache.org/~striker/httpd-2.1.0-pre3/
now since 1.3.29 / 2.0.48 is out the door, what happens to the 2.1.0 release?
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:33:39 -0800
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: http-2.0.48 (apr-util with db4) does not build on solaris
2.8?
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at
--On Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:24 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More bytes = Not OK. (Theoretically possible though with bad filters.)
Wrong. This is OK across the board, please consider;
Uh, no. We changed the filter semantics some time ago to stop this insanity.
At 02:16 PM 11/11/2003, Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
I've tagged the 2.1 tree with STRIKER_2_1_0_PRE3. Hopefully this is the
last tag before the first 2.1 release. Please give it a test run.
Tarballs are at:
http://www.apache.org/~striker/httpd-2.1.0-pre3/
now since 1.3.29 / 2.0.48 is out
* Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:28:12PM +0100, Andr Malo wrote:
There's currently no API for modules to determine the unmodified server
version. I'd like to introduce one (and backport to 2.0) -- see
attached patch. Any objections, comments?
No
--On Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:59 PM +0100 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, in concept I'd agree. (This function is was new for me :-)
But what about the cases where some vendor patches the patchlevel to name a
version like 2.0.48-1? I'd try to be flexible enough to allow such cases.
I'm able to reproduce the described symptoms every time
I check out the apache-1.3 repo. I've looked into it now but
couldn't find any problems so far.
It'd be great if one of the CVS gurus (infrastructure is cc'ed)
could have a quick look at this.
Further info:
a fresh checkout of httpd-docs-1.3
At 03:58 PM 11/11/2003, Erik Abele wrote:
I'm able to reproduce the described symptoms every time
I check out the apache-1.3 repo. I've looked into it now but
couldn't find any problems so far.
This is an artifact - htdocs/Attic should have never been left in apache-1.3
after it was moved across
According to William A. Rowe, Jr.:
Here is a simple suggestion; does anyone mind if I run CHANGES in 1.3,
2.0 and 2.1 through the following filter?
perl -e while(stdin){s#([^ @]*)@([^ @]*)#$1 $2#g;print $_;}
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht- Never put off until tomorrow what
Hi All,
Just thought I'd say thanks for this, as a lack of libapreq is one of the
reasons I have not yet moved to apache 2.x/mod_perl.
Thanks again!
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Joe Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] libapreq2-2.01_03-dev released
The
48 matches
Mail list logo
