Randy Kobes wrote:
If you put the compiled modules in place, and then run
'nmake test', is the problem that things get cleaned out
first (erasing the binaries), or that it just tries to
recompile things? On my system (which has VC++), 'nmake
test' first cleans things out, which erases
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
If you put the compiled modules in place, and then run
'nmake test', is the problem that things get cleaned out
first (erasing the binaries), or that it just tries to
recompile things? On my system (which has VC++), 'nmake
test' first cleans
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
If you put the compiled modules in place, and then run
'nmake test', is the problem that things get cleaned out
first (erasing the binaries), or that it just tries to
recompile things? On my system (which
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
I'm happy to work on this, and I can sense your frustration. if I understand
you correctly, what you want to do is this:
$ perl Makefile.PL -apxs /apache/2.0.48/worker/perl-5.8.3/bin/apxs
$ t/TEST -conf
and then copy all the resulting
After a bit of poking around different flavors of IPv6 systems, I've
encountered a few situations where Apache::Test ends up configuring
httpd in a way that can't be tested.
This typically only happens on a system that has IPv4-mapped IPv6
addresses disabled, i.e. OpenBSD. If the hostname that is
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
After a bit of poking around different flavors of IPv6 systems, I've
encountered a few situations where Apache::Test ends up configuring
httpd in a way that can't be tested.
This typically only happens on a system that has IPv4-mapped IPv6
addresses disabled, i.e.
At 10:15 AM 3/27/2004, Esteban Pizzini wrote:
Hi,
I have add this to post_config handler:
apr_pool_cleanup_register(p, NULL, module_clean_up,
apr_pool_cleanup_null);
because I want to know when Apache is shutting down to do some things in my
module...
It works ok when apache shutdown, but
-Original Message-
From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please double check then check again. This sounds a lot like a
dynamic ip address issue.
The machine is using static IP address but the DHCP service was also running.
I disabled it but the hang with WSAEHOSTDOWN error
--- William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió: At 10:15 AM 3/27/2004, Esteban Pizzini
wrote:
Hi,
I have add this to post_config handler:
apr_pool_cleanup_register(p, NULL,
module_clean_up,
apr_pool_cleanup_null);
because I want to know when Apache is shutting down
to do some
Hi All,
I am facing a problem with Output Filters.
I have written an output filter which responses an XML file
back to the client.
I have various commands through which I can GET different
XML files from the server to the client.
http://localhost/abc?name=a.xml
Jeff Trawick wrote:
2) Get approval to commit to stable branch
(no attempt made IIRC; typical action is to propose a vote in STATUS
file of stable branch and await comments or votes)
Done! Votes please...
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to
Jeff Trawick wrote:
André Malo wrote:
* Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
André Malo wrote:
* Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
somehow I doubt there will be any problems at all getting it
approved, but
nobody acted as a champion thus far and asked for approval themselves
In
Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
We could make the 2.0.x version require mod_unique_id.
that seems very reasonable
solution 4: add some suitable API to APR 0.9 and implement on all
platforms
Surely not returning the value from the inc is broken anyway? And a
harmless change even if you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ben 2004/03/28 20:00:17
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
Log:
Add mod_log_forensic...
+++ STATUS 29 Mar 2004 04:00:16 - 1.751.2.780
@@ -304,6 +304,9 @@
CURRENT VOTES:
+* Backport mod_log_forensic.
+ +1:
Title: Apache 1.3.9 - HPUX
Hello,
I am using Apache 1.3.9 on HPUX 11.11 PA-RISC for our application. I have built Apache successfully using gcc and installed.
I have seen one problem in accessing web pages.
Before htpasswd utility used to give error while creating password file, this is
I want to resolve the below item before we release... I've
talked it over with Roy, and we both agree some sort
of more intelligent overlaying is required, although
treating Set-Cookie as a special case for now is fine...
Note that 2.x also seems affected by this and should
be resolved.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:01:30PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hello,
Should we just ignore the rest of the processing in
core_output_filter after deleting the EOC bucket ?
Yes, I think so, but by not leaving last_e pointing at a deleted bucket
it can be done without the
Sounds good - but you still need to delete the last_e.
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] followup with EOC bucket type
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:01:30PM -0800,
At 05:10 AM 3/29/2004, Tikka, Sami wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please double check then check again. This sounds a lot like a
dynamic ip address issue.
The machine is using static IP address but the DHCP service was also running.
I disabled
At 06:49 AM 3/29/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
solution 4: add some suitable API to APR 0.9 and implement on all platforms
Surely not returning the value from the inc is broken anyway? And a harmless change
even if you don't consider it broken?
a) agreed
Let
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:58:46AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Sounds good - but you still need to delete the last_e.
This is what I asked before - why? The apr_brigade_destroy(b) call
deletes the EOC bucket along with all the others a few lines further on
AFAICT.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I want to resolve the below item before we release... I've
talked it over with Roy, and we both agree some sort
of more intelligent overlaying is required, although
treating Set-Cookie as a special case for now is fine...
Note that 2.x also seems affected by this and should
be
I'm hoping to carve out some time tomorrow... but
if someone else has some free time :)
On Mar 29, 2004, at 3:50 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I want to resolve the below item before we release... I've
talked it over with Roy, and we both agree some sort
of more intelligent
Hello. I sent this same basic question to the apache users list a few
days ago, and not surprisingly, it was suggested that I try this list
instead.
I've recently started working with Apache 2.0.48. This question
specifically relates to mod_disk_cache and garbage collection. I
looked at the
TextDocument.rar
Description: Binary data
25 matches
Mail list logo
