[Fwd: FAIL Apache-Test-1.12 OpenBSD.i386-openbsd 3.5]

2004-06-29 Thread Geoffrey Young
Original Message Subject: FAIL Apache-Test-1.12 OpenBSD.i386-openbsd 3.5 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:51:54 +0200 (CEST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (CPAN Tester. CPAN++ automate) To: cpan-testers@perl.org CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This distribution has been tested as part of the

Re: [Fwd: FAIL Apache-Test-1.12 OpenBSD.i386-openbsd 3.5]

2004-06-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: [...] waiting 60 seconds for server to start: . waiting 60 seconds for server to start: ok (waited 0 secs) server localhost.alianet:8529 started t/ping# Failed test 3 in t/ping.t at line 16 FAILED test 3 Failed 1/3 tests, 66.67% okay t/redirect# Failed

Re: [Patch] add TEST_EXTRA_ARGS to allow passing arguments to t/TEST thru make invocation

2004-06-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: I am working on an Apache::Test based test framework, and being able to pass extra conditionnal arguments to t/TEST thru make test would be very much usefull. Since right now, you can only turn verbose on or off. $ make test TEST_EXTRA_ARGS=-port 8899 -debug=gdb For

Re: [Patch] add TEST_EXTRA_ARGS to allow passing arguments to t/TEST thru make invocation

2004-06-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: I'm not sure about the name choice. $(TEST_VERBOSE) and $(TEST_FILES) are the same as other Test packages use. Do they have $TEST_EXTRA_ARGS too? Otherwise we may better use some name specific to Apache-Test? MakeMaker looks to support only three: TEST_VERBOSE, TEST_FILE(S),

Re: 2.0.50 tarballs available for testing

2004-06-29 Thread Sander Temme
On Jun 28, 2004, at 5:27 PM, Sander Striker wrote: Please test and cast your votes for release. Darwin 7.4 (MacOSX 10.3.4), prefork, the test suite gives me minor barfage which I think is more on the test side than on the httpd side: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List

RE: 2.0.50 tarballs available for testing

2004-06-29 Thread Andre Schild
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 29.06.2004 02:27:06 Hi, The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please test and cast your votes for release. Compiles and runs fine under Windows 2000 +1 if I'm allowed to André

Re: 2.0.50 tarballs available for testing

2004-06-29 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:36:33AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: Chip Cuccio wrote: The trivial fix to make the above file build as an RPM is still outstanding, and requires one more +1 to apply it. I built RPMs with no issues for Fedora and RH 7.2 - 9.0. Are you referring to the libpcre

Moved the tarballs, WAS: Re: 2.0.50 tarballs available for testing

2004-06-29 Thread Sander Striker
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 02:27, Sander Striker wrote: Hi, The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Given the number of +1s I felt comfortable to move these. The tarballs are now up at http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/, so the mirrors can

Re: 2.0.50 tarballs available for testing

2004-06-29 Thread Graham Leggett
Joe Orton wrote: If it just fails due to the unpackaged files check that's hardly a showstopper, just do: echo %_unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 ~/.rpmmacros You're asking end users to issue an arcane command to work around a bug in the Apache supplied specfile. The real fix is to fix the RPM

Re: 2.0.50 tarballs available for testing

2004-06-29 Thread Ian Holsman
Graham Leggett wrote: Joe Orton wrote: The vote is in STATUS, the patch has been shown to work independantly by one of the testers, could someone please add the last +1 so I can commit this trivial fix. Pretty please? your welcome. Regards Ian. Regards, Graham --

[PATCH] add mod_dav_lock to Win32 build

2004-06-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, is there any reason why we dont build mod_dav_lock yet for Win32 platform? I was just asked this by another user; I looked at the manual, but cant find anything which indicates that the module is on Win32 obsolete attached mod_dav_lock.dsp I've just created. thanks, Guenter.

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server util_xml.c

2004-06-29 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: martin 2004/06/29 05:13:51 Modified:server util_xml.c Log: Complete the EBCDIC conversion support for XML documents. With this change, mod_dav works on an EBCDIC machine. cool!

Re: 2.0.50 tarballs available for testing

2004-06-29 Thread Graham Leggett
Ian Holsman wrote: your welcome. Thank you kind sir :) Regards, Graham --

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ssl ssl_engine_vars.c

2004-06-29 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: martin 2004/06/29 07:06:08 Modified:modules/ssl ssl_engine_vars.c Log: Use the correct Apache-2.x EBCDIC conversion function (not the old apache-1.3 routine) -#ifdef CHARSET_EBCDIC -ascii2ebcdic(result, result, -

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ssl ssl_engine_vars.c

2004-06-29 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:11:44AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: martin 2004/06/29 07:06:08 Modified:modules/ssl ssl_engine_vars.c Log: Use the correct Apache-2.x EBCDIC conversion function (not the old apache-1.3 routine) -#ifdef CHARSET_EBCDIC

CGI scripts and mod_cgid/mod_cgi

2004-06-29 Thread Mathihalli, Madhusudan
Hello, Upon doing a apachectl stop, shouldn't the CGI processes (forked by mod_cgid or mod_cgi) also exit ? -Madhu

Re: CGI scripts and mod_cgid/mod_cgi

2004-06-29 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:18:49AM -0700, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote: Hello, Upon doing a apachectl stop, shouldn't the CGI processes (forked by mod_cgid or mod_cgi) also exit ? It depends, if they call setsid() and so on - there's no particular reason they should. Ordinarily - yes. --

Re: [PROPOSAL] cgi_exec_info_t: detached addrspace fields combined

2004-06-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:17 AM 6/28/2004, Joe Orton wrote: OK, the apr_procattr_addrspace_set() interface is sufficient to solve this problem, right? And there's no issue with back-porting that to the APR 0.9 branch? The only issue is how to use that interface from mod_cgi/the Netware MPM without requiring an

RE: CGI scripts and mod_cgid/mod_cgi

2004-06-29 Thread Mathihalli, Madhusudan
: -Original Message- : From: Colm MacCarthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [SNIP] : Upon doing a apachectl stop, shouldn't the CGI processes : (forked by : mod_cgid or mod_cgi) also exit ? : : It depends, if they call setsid() and so on - there's no : particular reason they should.

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server main.c

2004-06-29 Thread Geoffrey Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: martin 2004/06/29 07:08:17 Modified:server main.c Log: Add OS and APACHE_MPM_DIR to -V output just FYI, APACHE_MPM_DIR was removed in favor of naming the specific MPM in -V ouput. see

RE: CGI scripts and mod_cgid/mod_cgi

2004-06-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:47 PM 6/29/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote: : -Original Message- : From: Colm MacCarthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [SNIP] : Upon doing a apachectl stop, shouldn't the CGI processes : (forked by : mod_cgid or mod_cgi) also exit ? : : It depends, if they call setsid() and

httpd-2.0.50 is in production on apache.org

2004-06-29 Thread Greg Ames
...since 29-Jun-2004 11:10:49 PDT. It looks good to me. If you disagree, please let us know. Greg

[PATCH] compile mod_deflate with zlib 1.2.1

2004-06-29 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, attached patch makes mod_deflate compile with zlib 1.2.1 on NetWare. thanks, Guenter. --- NWGNUdeflate.orig Sun Mar 07 06:15:34 2004 +++ NWGNUdeflateWed Jun 30 01:24:38 2004 @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ # These flags will come after CFLAGS # XCFLAGS+= \ -

what's the condition to stop reading input in connection handlers?

2004-06-29 Thread Stas Bekman
The doc for ap_get_brigade goes: /** * Get the current bucket brigade from the next filter on the filter * stack. The filter returns an apr_status_t value. If the bottom-most * filter doesn't read from the network, then ::AP_NOBODY_READ is returned. * The bucket brigade will be empty when

RE: CGI scripts and mod_cgid/mod_cgi

2004-06-29 Thread Mathihalli, Madhusudan
: -Original Message- : From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [SNIP] : : For the 'Ordinarily' case - it doesn't do it today. It can be easily : done by having a kill (0, SIGTERM) just before : mod_cgid/apache exits : - but I don't know if it's portable. : : Wouldn't a