[PATCH] adds RequestHeader directive and variable expansion to mod_headers in Apache 1.3

2004-10-15 Thread Mathias Herberts
Hi, I've come up with the included patch to add a RequestHeader directive to mod_headers in the 1.3 tree. My patch adds a callback in the 'header parser' phase which takes care of the request headers. My patch also modifies mod_rewrite.c so in case we have EAPI installed lookup_variable is

[Patch 30399] New directive CacheIgnoreHeaders to prevent user defined headers from being stored by mod_cache

2004-10-15 Thread Rüdiger Plüm
Hi all, please find attached a new more general approch to prevent cookies from being stored in the cache. As proposed by Justin I replaced my original CacheStoreCookies directive with the more general CacheIgnoreHeaders directive. So far I only tested it for myself. If someone could test / have

Re: Regeneration of html version of manual from xml

2004-10-15 Thread Hiroaki KAWAI
Please see http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/docsformat.html. Hi all, does anybody know how to regenerate the html version of the manual once I made changes to the xml sources of the manual? Thanks in advance R

[RFC] Patch for mod_log_config to allow conditioning on status code

2004-10-15 Thread Luc Pardon
I patched mod_log_config.c (from the 2.0.51 distro) to allow conditional logging on HTTP status code, like so: CustomLog king-size.log common status=414 The patch also supports not and lists (like the %.. syntax) and wildcards, e.g.: CustomLog ungood.log common status=!20x,3xx

Re: [PATCH] adds RequestHeader directive and variable expansion to mod_headers in Apache 1.3

2004-10-15 Thread Andr Malo
* Mathias Herberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've come up with the included patch to add a RequestHeader directive to mod_headers in the 1.3 tree. We're going more and more to not adding new features to 1.3, so it's unlikely that the patch will go into that branch. It's considered *stable*, so

Re: [users@httpd] Asynchronous page creation?

2004-10-15 Thread Greg Ames
Craig, If I understand what you want to do, I've done a little like that with modifications mostly to the worker MPM for httpd-2.1. The patch is here - http://apache.org/~gregames/event.patch . But I was primarily interested in low hanging fruit - threads that are between HTTP requests. I

Use of X509_NAME_oneline in mod_ssl

2004-10-15 Thread Madhusudan Mathihalli
Hi, The current mod_ssl uses X509_NAME_oneline to get a one-line ASCII format of the DN. This however, is not compliant with the RFC - checkout http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#USER13. Moreover, the man page for X509_NAME_oneline (with OpenSSL 0.9.7x) says that the function is

Re: Use of X509_NAME_oneline in mod_ssl

2004-10-15 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 10:17:19AM -0700, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote: The current mod_ssl uses X509_NAME_oneline to get a one-line ASCII format of the DN. This however, is not compliant with the RFC - checkout http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#USER13. Moreover, the man page for

Re: Use of X509_NAME_oneline in mod_ssl

2004-10-15 Thread Madhusudan Mathihalli
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 21:14:16 +0100, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [SNIP] Moreover, the man page for X509_NAME_oneline (with OpenSSL 0.9.7x) says that the function is obsolete, and that we ought to use X509_NAME_print_ex. The RFC mentioned, RFC2253 is a mapping for DNs into a standard

Re: [RFC] Patch for mod_log_config to allow conditioning on status code

2004-10-15 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Luc Pardon wrote: I patched mod_log_config.c (from the 2.0.51 distro) to allow conditional logging on HTTP status code, like so: CustomLog king-size.log common status=414 The patch also supports not and lists (like the %.. syntax) and wildcards, e.g.:

Re: Use of X509_NAME_oneline in mod_ssl

2004-10-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:17 PM 10/15/2004, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote: Hi, The current mod_ssl uses X509_NAME_oneline to get a one-line ASCII format of the DN. This however, is not compliant with the RFC - checkout http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#USER13. Could you do us all a small flavor, give us

Re: [RFC] Patch for mod_log_config to allow conditioning on status code

2004-10-15 Thread Glenn Strauss
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 12:58:48AM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Luc Pardon wrote: The usual fate of patches in bugzilla is that, even if they are appropriate for inclusion, they need a committer to take sufficient interest to review and incorporate them. A chronic shortage of

Re: [RFC] Patch for mod_log_config to allow conditioning on status code

2004-10-15 Thread Paul Querna
Glenn Strauss wrote: On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Luc Pardon wrote: What are the general requirements to getting a patch or module included in the contrib/ directory? And on that topic, what happened to http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/contrib/ ? I think /contrib/ is dead. I would rather look at