David Wheeler wrote:
On Oct 19, 2004, at 11:23 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
But please wait before mp2/Apache-Test are released tomorrow, since
were are in the code freeze section as both have RC posted, and in
theory no code should be committed (docs are OK).
Will do.
Committed.
that was quick :)
Hey Gurpreet,
On Oct 21, 2004, at 3:57 PM, Gurpreet Grewal wrote:
I am facing a problem when I am trying to use the OpenSSL (0.9.7d to
be precise) with the BraodCom BCM5823 card. I tried running the
following two commands-
openssl des3 -in inputfile -out outputfile -engine ubsec
Quick question
Can/Should something be designated as a filter AND a handler? For
example the filter would pre-process the request such as POST data etc.
The handler would work on what the filter setup? Or do I completely not
understand the Apache module struct?
Is there another place to
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
Quick question
Can/Should something be designated as a filter AND a handler? For
example the filter would pre-process the request such as POST data etc.
The handler would work on what the filter setup? Or do I completely not
understand the
At 11:43 AM 10/22/2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
Quick question
Can/Should something be designated as a filter AND a handler? For example the
filter would pre-process the request such as POST data etc. The handler would work
on what the filter setup? Or do I completely not understand
+ * 20041022 (2.1.0-dev) API changes to clean up 64bit compiles
*/
#define MODULE_MAGIC_COOKIE 0x41503230UL /* AP20 */
#ifndef MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MAJOR
-#define MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MAJOR 20040425
+#define MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MAJOR 20041022
#endif
-#define MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MINOR 1
On Oct 22, 2004, at 10:58 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:43 AM 10/22/2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
Quick question
Can/Should something be designated as a filter AND a handler?
For example the filter would pre-process the request such as POST
data etc. The handler would work on what
At 01:54 PM 10/22/2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
Is there another place to discuss 3rd Party modules? the modules list given
on the http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html doesn't exist anymore?
Did you try [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've rearranged
some infrastructure, so I've asked Adam to
On Oct 22, 2004, at 12:11 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:54 PM 10/22/2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
Is there another place to discuss 3rd Party modules? the
modules list given on the http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html
doesn't exist anymore?
Did you try [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ 1.3.32: Tagged October 18, 2004. Not released.
It may be silly to argue over, but for all intents and purposes, 1.3.32
was released. We just never sent an email announcement. It's on the
website, it's in the distribution directory, and it hit
Joshua Slive wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ 1.3.32: Tagged October 18, 2004. Not released.
It may be silly to argue over, but for all intents and purposes, 1.3.32
was released. We just never sent an email announcement. It's on the
website, it's in the
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
whoa! -1
Was this even discussed on the list? You just changed the
entire module API and introduced a dozen potential security holes.
The precursor to this patch [PATCH] WIN64: httpd API changes
was posted 10/7 so I thought we had had suitable time for
discussion. I have
The precursor to this patch [PATCH] WIN64: httpd API changes
was posted 10/7 so I thought we had had suitable time for
discussion. I have addressed the one issue that was raised.
That explains why I didn't see it -- I was in Switzerland.
There have also been several other threads on the httpd apr
Roy is right...
Willy-nilly throwing casts on data objects just to satisfy some
anal-retentive urge to not see any warnings appearing during a
compile is the absolute WRONG thing to do when it comes
to porting 32-bit code to 64-bit platforms.
The situation is NOT as simple as it was when
* Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
ACK.
We'd be glad to get it in the official tree.
Have a patch against 2.1/cvs that I can review?
Not yet - we're just working on 2.0.x.
Where are major differences between 2.0 and 2.1 branches ?
cu
--
15 matches
Mail list logo