Re: Fix: Apache::TestRequest::redirect_ok

2004-10-22 Thread Stas Bekman
David Wheeler wrote: On Oct 19, 2004, at 11:23 PM, David Wheeler wrote: But please wait before mp2/Apache-Test are released tomorrow, since were are in the code freeze section as both have RC posted, and in theory no code should be committed (docs are OK). Will do. Committed. that was quick :)

Re: OpenSSL with Security Processor

2004-10-22 Thread Sander Temme
Hey Gurpreet, On Oct 21, 2004, at 3:57 PM, Gurpreet Grewal wrote: I am facing a problem when I am trying to use the OpenSSL (0.9.7d to be precise) with the BraodCom BCM5823 card. I tried running the following two commands- openssl des3 -in inputfile -out outputfile -engine ubsec

module filter vs handler

2004-10-22 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Quick question Can/Should something be designated as a filter AND a handler? For example the filter would pre-process the request such as POST data etc. The handler would work on what the filter setup? Or do I completely not understand the Apache module struct? Is there another place to

Re: module filter vs handler

2004-10-22 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote: Quick question Can/Should something be designated as a filter AND a handler? For example the filter would pre-process the request such as POST data etc. The handler would work on what the filter setup? Or do I completely not understand the

Re: module filter vs handler

2004-10-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:43 AM 10/22/2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote: Quick question Can/Should something be designated as a filter AND a handler? For example the filter would pre-process the request such as POST data etc. The handler would work on what the filter setup? Or do I completely not understand

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c protocol.c request.c scoreboard.c util.c util_script.c

2004-10-22 Thread Roy T . Fielding
+ * 20041022 (2.1.0-dev) API changes to clean up 64bit compiles */ #define MODULE_MAGIC_COOKIE 0x41503230UL /* AP20 */ #ifndef MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MAJOR -#define MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MAJOR 20040425 +#define MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MAJOR 20041022 #endif -#define MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MINOR 1

Re: module filter vs handler

2004-10-22 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Oct 22, 2004, at 10:58 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 11:43 AM 10/22/2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote: Quick question Can/Should something be designated as a filter AND a handler? For example the filter would pre-process the request such as POST data etc. The handler would work on what

Re: module filter vs handler

2004-10-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:54 PM 10/22/2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote: Is there another place to discuss 3rd Party modules? the modules list given on the http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html doesn't exist anymore? Did you try [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've rearranged some infrastructure, so I've asked Adam to

Re: module filter vs handler

2004-10-22 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Oct 22, 2004, at 12:11 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 01:54 PM 10/22/2004, Nathanael Noblet wrote: Is there another place to discuss 3rd Party modules? the modules list given on the http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html doesn't exist anymore? Did you try [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/modules/standard mod_include.c

2004-10-22 Thread Joshua Slive
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + 1.3.32: Tagged October 18, 2004. Not released. It may be silly to argue over, but for all intents and purposes, 1.3.32 was released. We just never sent an email announcement. It's on the website, it's in the distribution directory, and it hit

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/modules/standard mod_include.c

2004-10-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
Joshua Slive wrote: On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + 1.3.32: Tagged October 18, 2004. Not released. It may be silly to argue over, but for all intents and purposes, 1.3.32 was released. We just never sent an email announcement. It's on the website, it's in the

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c protocol.c request.c scoreboard.c util.c util_script.c

2004-10-22 Thread Allan Edwards
Roy T. Fielding wrote: whoa! -1 Was this even discussed on the list? You just changed the entire module API and introduced a dozen potential security holes. The precursor to this patch [PATCH] WIN64: httpd API changes was posted 10/7 so I thought we had had suitable time for discussion. I have

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c protocol.c request.c scoreboard.c util.c util_script.c

2004-10-22 Thread Roy T. Fielding
The precursor to this patch [PATCH] WIN64: httpd API changes was posted 10/7 so I thought we had had suitable time for discussion. I have addressed the one issue that was raised. That explains why I didn't see it -- I was in Switzerland. There have also been several other threads on the httpd apr

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c protocol.c request.c scoreboard.c uti...

2004-10-22 Thread TOKILEY
Roy is right... Willy-nilly throwing casts on data objects just to satisfy some anal-retentive urge to not see any warnings appearing during a compile is the absolute WRONG thing to do when it comes to porting 32-bit code to 64-bit platforms. The situation is NOT as simple as it was when

Re: Removing the Experimental MPMs in 2.2?

2004-10-22 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, ACK. We'd be glad to get it in the official tree. Have a patch against 2.1/cvs that I can review? Not yet - we're just working on 2.0.x. Where are major differences between 2.0 and 2.1 branches ? cu --