will the sun still shine when we get any next 2.1+ release?

2005-02-22 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, not much more to say than the subject; I think a couple of folks are waiting for any next alpha/beta/gamma release of the 2.1-dev line; and its only fair also for the developers of third-party modules that you start now to put _something_ out which shows up the main direction for 2.2

Re: will the sun still shine when we get any next 2.1+ release?

2005-02-22 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:56 AM +0100 Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, not much more to say than the subject; I think a couple of folks are waiting for any next alpha/beta/gamma release of the 2.1-dev line; and its only fair also for the developers of third-party modules that

Re: Proposal: Make --with-program-name NOT rename httpd.conf, but DO rename httpd.pid

2005-02-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
No, this makes no sense, if I build httpd13 and httpd2 I expect two different conf files. Bill At 10:01 AM 2/20/2005, Max Bowsher wrote: Proposal: Make --with-program-name NOT rename httpd.conf, but DO rename httpd.pid Since apache installs many config files, these config files are never placed

Re: Proposal: Make --with-program-name NOT rename httpd.conf, but DO rename httpd.pid

2005-02-22 Thread Max Bowsher
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: No, this makes no sense, if I build httpd13 and httpd2 I expect two different conf files. Then, how do you manage the other files that apache installs into the same directory as httpd.conf ? And, what do you do about the pidfiles, which both default to

Re: Proposal: Make --with-program-name NOT rename httpd.conf, but DO rename httpd.pid

2005-02-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:13 PM 2/22/2005, Max Bowsher wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: No, this makes no sense, if I build httpd13 and httpd2 I expect two different conf files. Then, how do you manage the other files that apache installs into the same directory as httpd.conf ? We should consider this.

Re: will the sun still shine when we get any next 2.1+ release?

2005-02-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:31 AM 2/22/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:56 AM +0100 Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been hoping to do the next 2.1 release soon, however, I'm not sure that OtherBill has reverted the changes that busted the Win32 build. Once he does that,

[PATCH] Fix mod_dav exports on Windows

2005-02-22 Thread Branko Čibej
A number of public functions in mod_dav.h aren't properly exported with DAV_DECLARE. This recently became a problem for Subversion, because mod_dav_svn now supports DAV locking, and mod_dav's locking functions were amongst the ones that were not exported. Nobody noticed this on Unix where

Error with Apache 1.x web servers while posting data from one HTML page to another HTML page

2005-02-22 Thread Rahul Kohli
Hi I have two HTML pages hosted on Apache 1.3.33 web server on Solaris. The first HTML page have some text fields and a submit button. On clicking the button this HTML page should posts the data to second HTML page. This has been done by specifying path for the second HTML page in the action

[VOTE] 2.1.3 as beta

2005-02-22 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
2.1.3 tarballs at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'd like to get enough votes for 2.1.3 to be a beta and commence the feature freeze towards a 2.2.0 GA. As we discussed at ApacheCon in November (over three months ago), this would mean we create a 2.2.x branch from the 2.1.3 tag and bump

Re: [VOTE] 2.1.3 as beta

2005-02-22 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:04 PM -0800 Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.1.3 tarballs at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'd like to get enough votes for 2.1.3 to be a beta and commence the feature freeze towards a 2.2.0 GA. For the record, +1. 2.1.3 passes httpd-test on