W. Rowe wrote
Ping(!) Would appreciate if anyone would try testing this release and
replying on-list if virtual, files in fact really are working. If not
I'll pull down the snapshot, if so I'll move forward on 'AspNet error'
to bypass Apache ErrorDocument handling.
Adrian says
This
Using mod_auth_sspi results in an exception in the WindowsIdentity class.
The user token is being sourced from the
System.Web.Hosting.SimpleWorkerRequest class which returns a null
pointer from the GetUserToken() method.
The ISAPIWorkerRequestInProc and ISAPIWorkerRequestOutOfProc classes
(same
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-77?page=comments#action_12356765
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-77:
---
Just to make this problem even more complicated, due to how Mac OS X handles
unloading of dynamically loaded
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-77?page=all ]
Graham Dumpleton updated MODPYTHON-77:
--
Attachment: grahamd_20051105.tar.gz
Here is my first go at an alternate patch for this problem. Patch was made
against SVN head, believed to be
So, same reason. Also in file mod_mem_cache.c around line 786, there
is a malloc(mobj-m_len), and a few lines later, another
malloc(obj-count) is performed.
If the second malloc fails, I think also should add something like
free(mobj-m);
mobj-m = NULL;
reasonable?
Thx, Xuekun
On 11/3/05,
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 03:37:10PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
All versions need unclean shutdown at least, not sure about keepalive. If
you
have new data to provide on this front that's great and very welcome, please
send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] bugzilla is not a
Brandon Fosdick wrote:
Noobie question...what's the difference between authentication,
authorization and access?
Authentication asks is this user who they say they are, this stage
usually involves a username and password of some sort, or a certificate,
etc.
Authorisation asks is this
Eric B. wrote:
# Production Server
Location /ASPTest/
ProxyPassReverse /
/Location
ProxyPass /ASPTest/ http://192.168.100.1/
# Development Test Server
Location /dev/ASPTest/
ProxyPassReverse /
/Location
ProxyPass /dev/ASPTest/
On 11/4/05, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 03:37:10PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
All versions need unclean shutdown at least, not sure about keepalive.
If you
have new data to provide on this front that's great and very welcome,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-77?page=comments#action_12356757
]
Boyan Boyadjiev commented on MODPYTHON-77:
--
Sorry - I didn't saw the change done for MODPYTHON-83. PyThreadState_Swap must
be added in the non thread case of
Anyone?
* Andr__ Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Aug 4 10:07:57 2005
New Revision: 227435
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=227435view=rev
Log:
mod_proxy: Fix over-eager handling of '%' for reverse proxies. PR 29554.
Note
Nick Kew wrote:
I'm not convinced by that either. In fact, I dislike the whole run it in a
quick handler principle - it runs a supertanker through the KISS principle,
and has consequently left us with a cache that never really worked.
Even if we fix this, it's sure to have a high bugrate for
Xuekun Hu wrote:
So, same reason. Also in file mod_mem_cache.c around line 786, there
is a malloc(mobj-m_len), and a few lines later, another
malloc(obj-count) is performed.
If the second malloc fails, I think also should add something like
free(mobj-m);
mobj-m = NULL;
reasonable?
No.
On 11/3/2005 at 10:38 pm, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As if the old system wasn't hard enough to wrap one's head around.
Just when
I had it figured out enough to go and write mod_auth_userdir you guys
go and
change things on me.
BTW, when did this change? I've
Graham Leggett wrote:
The httpd cache is simply yet another cache in the chain of HTTP/1.1
caches that are typically present when a browser accepts a page from a
website. The authentication issue is handled by RFC2616 already, and as
long as httpd mod_cache conforms to the correct headers
Bengt-Arne Fjellner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The documentation for APR::Request ought to mention that atleast jar
and params returns undef if there is no cookie/param
done.
--
Joe Schaefer
Joshua Slive wrote:
I haven't looked carefully at the code, but I don't believe
protocol-level things like the force-response-1.0 variable are stored in
the cache.
If it's a global setenvif variable (runs is post-read, before
quick-handler), then these adjustments work, because
Joshua Slive said:
I agree with you about 90%. The problem is that there are a very few
things that aren't accounted for in standard HTTP caching rules. One
example is Varying access by client IP address.
I can't see how you could have any meaningful caching at all if the
content is varied
I almost tried to snip the comments below in my reply, and there was nothing
I could clip out - thank you Graham for explaining so clearly the entire design
principals of how and why mod_proxy does exactly what it does.
It leaves us wondering; how can allow from/deny from n.n.n.n be mapped to
Graham Leggett wrote:
Joshua Slive said:
I agree with you about 90%. The problem is that there are a very few
things that aren't accounted for in standard HTTP caching rules. One
example is Varying access by client IP address.
I can't see how you could have any meaningful caching at all
On 11/04/2005 08:20 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
[..cut..]
In this case you'd probably not use the cache at all for this part of the
URL space.
This is the case we've been discussing where someone wishes to, for
example, restrict a reverse proxy to a particular
On 11/04/2005 07:36 AM, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
[..cut..]
Maybe I'm pessimistic, but I think, omitting the Vary header for
uncompressed ressources will lead to poisoned caches, which statistically
nearly always will request the uncompressed variant and so actually
*add* load to your
This has been discussed many times before and no one
seems to understand what the fundamental problem is.
It is not with the servers at all, it is with the CLIENTS.
What both of you are saying is true... whether you "Vary:"
on "Content-encoding" and/or "User-agent" or not... there
is a risk of
On Oct 30, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
I'm just looking at docs/2.1 and noting some existing pages that
definitely
need updating. No reference to pages that need writing, or to non-
English
versions of anything. I might tackle some of these myself, but no
promises.
*** = really
This is currently listed as a show stopper in the 2.2.x/STATUS file:
The edge connection filter cannot be removed:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-devm=105366252619530w=2
jerenkrantz asks: Why should this block a release?
stas replies: because it requires a rewrite of the filters
25 matches
Mail list logo
