On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:07:44PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
The way I would expect it to work would be by passing f-next in to
the store_body callback, it looks doomed to eat RAM as currently
designed. mod_disk_cache's
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Joe Orton wrote:
I've run into apr_brigade_insert_file() creating brigades that's not
possible to sendfile() (EINVAL), this is with httpd-2.2.2 on Ubuntu
Breezy Linux amd64 (64bit). The file in question is 4.3GB, and it
seems that sendfile() doesn't cope with that.
Has
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:26:56AM +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Joe Orton wrote:
OK, what filesystem? Colm had reported the same thing on Debian/IA64,
which was on an NFS mount, IIRC. If you adjust apr_brigade_insert_file
to only allow buckets of MAX_BUCKET_SIZE
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
1. This is an API change which might be hard to backport.
2. I do not really like the close tie between the storage provider
and the filter chain. It forces the provider to do things it
should not care about from my point of
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Joe Orton wrote:
This was on XFS and on an NFS mount. It should be noted that this
works on a 32bit (also Ubuntu Breezy) machine with identical config.
Can you try it on a local ext3 filesystem?
Same results.
if (length MAX_BUCKET_SIZE) {
does that work?
It
Graham Leggett wrote:
I think in the long run, a dedicated process is the way to go.
I think using a provider architecture would be best and keep complexity
out of mod_cache. Some module(s) would implement the necessary cache
management functions and mod_cache would push/pull/probe the
On 5/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Thu May 4 04:18:45 2006
New Revision: 399665
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399665view=rev
Log:
Stop returning DECLINED from the output filter for proxy
requests.
FWIW, this is a rather obscure codepath.
Hello, I need to use a handler that intercept all the incoming requests in Apache for that I can change the values of this requests. I tryed to create a new handler called mod_test.c, using the mod_asis structure ( I took the mod_asis ,changed some function name, and saved this new file like
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Joe Orton wrote:
This was on XFS and on an NFS mount. It should be noted that this
works on a 32bit (also Ubuntu Breezy) machine with identical config.
Can you try it on a local ext3 filesystem?
Same
Sorry, but are you running a 32 bit userland with your 64 bit kernel? If
you are, then the compatibility layer is involved, and sendfile is still
taking 32 bit values...
I think I see a kernel bug here that would cause any count (2 ** 31 - 1)
to get garbled, but only with 32-bit compat mode
Could someone change the subject of this status mail?
Hi --
I've been working away on PR #39275 and in the process of thinking
about that and studying the scoreboard and the various MPMs, I've
turned up a few things. Rather than try to jam them all together
I've broken out the first set of them and thought I'd start mailing
them to the list.
Hi --
It looks to me like the memory allocated for ap_scoreboard_image
is a little bit over-sized. In r104404 the lb_score elements were
added to the scoreboard in the manner of the worker_score array,
and then in r105134 much of this was reversed, but the call to
calloc() still sizes
Hi --
This may not be necessary, but I notice that prefork and most of
the other MPMs set ap_my_generation to an initial value of zero.
The worker and event MPMs don't, though.
Chris.
=
---
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:36:54PM -0400, Chris Darroch wrote:
This may not be necessary, but I notice that prefork and most of
the other MPMs set ap_my_generation to an initial value of zero.
The worker and event MPMs don't, though.
Yes, we don't have any consistency in the actual code
Hi --
An older but essentially identical version of this patch is
in Bugzilla PR #38737.
Using the worker MPM (but not the event MPM), if Keep-Alives
are enabled and the timeout is reasonably long (e.g., 15 seconds),
then worker threads wait in poll() after handling a request
for any
On 05/04/2006 01:26 PM, wrote:
Author: trawick
+ *) mod_charset_lite: Bypass translation when the source and dest charsets
+ are the same. [Jeff Trawick]
As I am not an expert on mod_charset_lite a short question:
Can this ever happen apart from a situation where the server is
On 05/04/2006 10:51 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Here is the expected way to encounter that:
Location /
CharsetSourceEnc IBM-1047
CharsetDefault ISO-8859-1
/Location
Location /somedir/
# already in the right charset
CharsetSourceEnc ISO-8859-1
/Location
So we shouldn't go through
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Alexey Toptygin wrote:
Sorry, but are you running a 32 bit userland with your 64 bit kernel? If
you are, then the compatibility layer is involved, and sendfile is still
taking 32 bit values...
Never mind, on reading the thread more closely, I see that you said 64
bit.
19 matches
Mail list logo
