I'm seeing this error on NetBSD 3.0 with make/gmake and autoconf 2.59
I can duplicate it on FreeBSD, but only using autconf 2.60.
gmake[6]: Entering directory
`/home/pgollucci/dev/repos/asf/httpd/apreq/2.08-RC4/glue/perl/xs/APR/Request/Apache2'
Steve Hay wrote:
Sorry, but I'm still seeing quite a few failures. I started with a
completely fresh build (with your patch applied) and the top-level
nmake test failed a bunch of upload.t tests first time. (So it's not
just running the test multiple times that causes the problem.)
I then
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Sorry, but I'm still seeing quite a few failures. I started with a
completely fresh build (with your patch applied) and the top-level
nmake test failed a bunch of upload.t tests first time. (So it's
not just running the test multiple
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
Also, just to verify that it is the stray temp files
left over that are causing the problem, does it help
if you change the APR_EXCL flag in the
call to apr_file_mktemp on about line 832 of library/util.c
to APR_TRUNCATE?
Yep, that
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 06:54:33PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/23/2006 02:10 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
- use APR apr_file_* not ANSI C fopen,
I need a FILE *.
Maybe you could use BIO_new_file / PEM_read_bio_PKCS7 as it is done in
similar
On 07/24/2006 09:15 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 06:54:33PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/23/2006 02:10 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
- use APR apr_file_* not ANSI C fopen,
I need a FILE *.
Maybe you could use BIO_new_file /
That is, bug and feature request, not bug and feature request.
As I reported in
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39907
I'm finding that with the worker MPM and a pristine httpd 2.2.2 on an
i386 Debian platform, changes I make to the configuration within
balancer-manager will
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
Sorry, but I'm still seeing quite a few failures. I started with a
completely fresh build (with your patch applied) and the top-level
nmake test failed a bunch of upload.t tests first time. (So it's not
just running the test multiple times that
On Mon, July 24, 2006 2:50 am, Davi Arnaut wrote:
Here is the first code drop regarding my SoC proposal Redesigning and
extending
the Apache cache architecture
(http://verdesmares.com/Apache/proposal.txt).
The patches are mainly clenaups and bug-fixes, except a new mod_disk_cache
directory
Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
That is, bug and feature request, not bug and feature request.
As I reported in
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39907
I'm finding that with the worker MPM and a pristine httpd 2.2.2 on an
i386 Debian platform, changes I make to the configuration
On 24.07.2006 15:23, Vincent de Lau wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c
+ certificates (`/path/to/file' - PEM ecnoded))
Typo: encoded, also in later patches (latest is r424735?)
Fixed in r425052. Thanks.
Regards
Rüdiger
I don't want the 2.2.3 release to be held up too much, but there
are some things being worked on in the proxy balancer code
that would be useful to be available in 2.2.3. Mladen and
JFC are working on the AJP stuff and as soon as they
commit their changes, I'll be adding in my balancer set
On 24.07.2006 16:12, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I don't want the 2.2.3 release to be held up too much, but there
are some things being worked on in the proxy balancer code
that would be useful to be available in 2.2.3. Mladen and
JFC are working on the AJP stuff and as soon as they
commit their
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Sorry, but I'm still seeing quite a few failures. I started with a
completely fresh build (with your patch applied) and the top-level nmake
test failed a bunch of upload.t tests first time. (So it's not just running
the test multiple times that causes
Having added the following to my virtual host
location /
reject ip 127.0.0.1
/location
results in a 401 response and the following entries in the error_log
[Mon Jul 24 16:56:03 2006] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] user (null): authorization
failure for /:
[Mon Jul 24 16:56:03 2006] [error]
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I don't want the 2.2.3 release to be held up too much, but there
are some things being worked on in the proxy balancer code
that would be useful to be available in 2.2.3. Mladen and
JFC are working on the AJP stuff and as soon as they
commit their changes, I'll be adding in
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I don't want the 2.2.3 release to be held up too much, but there
are some things being worked on in the proxy balancer code
that would be useful to be available in 2.2.3. Mladen and
JFC are working on the AJP stuff and as soon as they
commit their changes, I'll be adding in
On 7/24/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of this sounds great!But I'm planning to TR by Wednesday, it'sjust been way too long since we've had a release.Pathetic really :)TR = Tag and release right?Same voting rules apply? no member input is welcome but votes don't count?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I don't want the 2.2.3 release to be held up too much, but there
But if any of the proxy/balancer devs know of actual showstoppers, real
regressions, it would be great to get that patched by sometime tomorrow.
I doubt thats realistic
On Jul 24, 2006, at 12:54 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I don't want the 2.2.3 release to be held up too much, but there
are some things being worked on in the proxy balancer code
that would be useful to be available in 2.2.3. Mladen and
JFC are working on the AJP stuff
Jim Jagielski wrote:
All of this sounds great! But I'm planning to TR by Wednesday, it's
just been way too long since we've had a release. Pathetic really :)
We can then do a quick 2.2.4 in a month to capture the balancer
and other goodies.
That would be great.
There are few things
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
On 7/24/06, *William A. Rowe, Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of this sounds great! But I'm planning to TR by Wednesday, it's
just been way too long since we've had a release. Pathetic really :)
TR = Tag and release right?
Tag
On 7/24/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote: On 7/24/06, *William A. Rowe, Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of this sounds great!But I'm planning to TR by Wednesday, it's just been way too long since we've had a release.Pathetic really
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
On 7/24/06, *William A. Rowe, Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tag Roll :) It's similar, but there's no 'release' till it has
the votes.
Ooh so close ^^
So tag - source code is tarred?
tag - we bump versions and dup from
Ah that cleares it up :)Is there any [EMAIL PROTECTED] jargon page ;)i'll try to do a svn co
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/ and compile on mac os x tomorrow at work and maybe one later on windows once i get home.thinks to look fore are compile errors and
On 07/24/2006 10:28 PM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Ah that cleares it up :)
Is there any [EMAIL PROTECTED] jargon page ;)
I think not, but feel free to propose a patch for the
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/
section or a subpage :-).
i'll try to do a svn co
On 7/24/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/24/2006 10:28 PM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Ah that cleares it up :) Is there any [EMAIL PROTECTED] jargon page ;)I think not, but feel free to propose a patch for the
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/section or a subpage :-). i'll try to do a svn
Hi --
Some time ago, I proposed this large patchset (better described,
I think, by the message referenced by the second link below):
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-devm=114729206702495w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-devm=114788040600327w=2
Discussing
I just installed 2.2 on a FreeBSD box to start playing with it and noticed that
the installed httpd.conf has the, apparently self-contradicting, text shown
below. Granted, it's just a comment, but it could be confusing for new users.
Unless I'm missing something?
# Configuration and logfile
29 matches
Mail list logo
