[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-155?page=all ]
Graham Dumpleton resolved MODPYTHON-155.
Resolution: Fixed
Memory inefficiency fixed, but more importantly new problem caused by fixes for
memory leaks described in MODPYTHON-181
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-181?page=comments#action_12425493
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-181:
Note that you will not actually see this change in the trunk now as changes
related to MODPYTHON-155
The site's been update (both mopython.org and the download page), so
3.2.10 is out. I'll work on the announcement next.
Grisha
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
Core +1 from me. I will take care of the signing, etc, some time tomorrow.
P.S. In order for you to be
In the section :
RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP:,
I think that the first link should target :
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDproduct=Apache+httpd-2keywords=PatchAvailable
(the difference is
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Philip M. Gollucci
Is a release in the 2.0.x (2.0.59) soon to follow ?
It is already there.
Regards
Rüdiger
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and The Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the release of version 2.2.3 of the Apache HTTP Server
(Apache).
This version of Apache is principally a bug and
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 Released
...
CVE-2006-3747: An off-by-one flaw exists in the Rewrite module,
mod_rewrite, as shipped with Apache 1.3 since 1.3.28, 2.0 since 2.0.46,
and 2.2 since 2.2.0.
Is a release
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I guess we've all agreed that checking hot standbys 1st before
checking other sets is what makes the most sense, so I've gone
ahead and enabled that. -trunk is now complete (except for
the docs)...
Right.
In all other cases it really does not mater where
the next request
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I guess we've all agreed that checking hot standbys 1st before
checking other sets is what makes the most sense, so I've gone
ahead and enabled that. -trunk is now complete (except for
the docs)...
Right.
In all other cases it really does
Greetings,
I think a lot of busy admins would appreciate it if the release
announcement pages had a date on them (eg
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html).
Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored.
PS - it's a bit cheeky to post this
Hi,
I'm use mod_auth_ntlm_winbind module, which provides support for NTLM
and Negotiate authentications throw the Samba's ntlm_auth utility.
(The same way Squid does NTLM now).
All works fine -- both for normal and proxy auth, except one little
issue with the proxy auth.
The
Cool, I'll see about updating the download webpage some time today thereby
unleashing 3.2.10...
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Grisha wrote ..
Is this a mod_python problem? Should we scrap 3.2.10? - it's out there,
but the download page has not beed updated and no
On 8/3/06, Dmitry Butskoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found that most browsers (Mozilla, IE) send also Proxy-Connection:
keep-alive header. IE6 sends it too when uses CONNECTION ...
HTTP/1.0. This header is similar to ordinary Connection: keep-alive
header, which alters the behaviour of
Brian Rectanus wrote:
On 8/3/06, Dmitry Butskoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found that most browsers (Mozilla, IE) send also Proxy-Connection:
keep-alive header. IE6 sends it too when uses CONNECTION ...
HTTP/1.0. This header is similar to ordinary Connection: keep-alive
header, which
It seems that there is a lot of people who were requiring this feature.I've developed a module ( http://modules.apache.org/search.php?id=962 ) that tricks the core of httpd by faking a proxy request in order to make it possible in module-land, to change this HTTP header.
To wrowe: If the response
On httpd.apache.org is at 2.059:
The Apache HTTP Server Project is *proud* to announce the legacy...
At 1.3.37
The Apache Group is *pleased* to announce the legacy...
Is the project is still proud to announce 2.0.x ?
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL
François wrote:
If the response is being forwarded through a proxy, the proxy application
MUST NOT modify the Server response-header.
I think that if you configure your httpd in a [reverse] proxy mode,
mod_header allow you to modify Server:, so it is not a problem if a
new directive
Steve VanDevender wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci writes:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and The Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the release of version 2.2.3 of the Apache HTTP Server
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Steve VanDevender wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci writes:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and The Apache HTTP Server
Project are
pleased to announce the release of version
On 08/03/2006 06:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Aug 3 09:01:50 2006
New Revision: 428437
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=428437view=rev
Log:
Use only one slotmem for status and checker.
Modified:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/03/2006 06:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Aug 3 09:01:50 2006
New Revision: 428437
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=428437view=rev
Log:
Use only one slotmem for status and checker.
Modified:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/03/2006 06:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Aug 3 09:01:50 2006
New Revision: 428437
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=428437view=rev
Log:
Use only one slotmem for status and checker.
Modified:
Hi --
Some time ago, I proposed this large patchset (better described,
I think, by the message referenced by the second link below):
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-devm=114729206702495w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-devm=114788040600327w=2
Discussing
If I recall correctly, the part of the core responsible for adding the HTTP header Server: is : /* keep the set-by-proxy server header, otherwise * generate a new server header */ if (r- proxyreq != PROXYREQ_NONE) {
server = apr_table_get(r- headers_out, Server); if (server) {
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Sebastian Nohn wrote:
please take the time to read it before voting against the proposal :)
If the response is being forwarded through a proxy, the proxy application MUST
NOT modify the Server response-header.
I haven't reviewed the patch, but I presume your
Brian J. France wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 3:57 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Sebastian Nohn wrote:
please take the time to read it before voting against the proposal :)
I am all for this patch (I know my vote means nothing)!
Which brings me to the question what the general process in
Please review the code style guidelines:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/styleguide.html
In the following revisions I found things that I consider to not be in
line with the guidelines:
427920
427928
428008
428029
Specifically, most of them are missing { and } around one life if/else
statements.
27 matches
Mail list logo
