Hi,
I think I might have spotted a slight bug in Session.py. When the
'secret' parameter is supplied to use the SignedCookie class, it appears
that __init__ of BaseSession doesn't check the return type of get_cookies().
If I understand the SignedCookie docs correctly, if the cookie value
* Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anyone knows how to detect the mpm used so that
module can be build with/without threading code
depending if the mpm is prefork or any other threaded
one like worker by using apxs?
are you shure you really want to know the mpm name instead of
just
* Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
or if you've already compiled it ...
$ /usr/sbin/apache2 -V | grep MPM
-D APACHE_MPM_DIR=server/mpm/worker
Bad, very bad. Breaks crosscompiling.
Ah, yeah, apache cannot be crosscompile'd w/o massive manual
intervention at all ... ;-o
(but I'm
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-187?page=comments#action_12431530
]
Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-187:
-
I've audited tableobject.c for other lines where NULL is being passed to
PyString_FromString and found a
Hi folks,
I'd like to accounce that the apache httpd, apr + friends are
listed in the Comprehensive Source Database at:
http://sourcefarm.metux.de
This database contains the tarball URLs of dozens of package
releases and it's intended to be used by fully automated systems,
so no more
* Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at perchild with the aim of getting it working.
maybe you're looking for: http://www.metux.de/mpm
The project has been stalled for quite a while :(
But maybe it's time for revival ?
In STATUS I see:
Get perchild to work on platforms
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:59:02PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
The whole idea of passing *sockets* (instead of requests) between
processes only works on very few systems, ie. Linux, BSD and
perhaps some others. So the whole portability issue is useless -
those MPMs only work some Unix'es,
... so that ServerTokens doesn't affect what gets logged to the error
log at startup (or any other place where we want the description of
the server instead of the banner to be written over the network).
This patch axes ap_get_server_version() so that third-party modules
will be forced to make a
We tested a Sun t2000 with httpd 2.2. It did okay. Now, Sun says
there is an issue with 2.2 and portfs on Solaris 10 on the t2000. Not
real sure what this means. Anyone else heard this?
--
Brian Akins
Chief Operations Engineer
Turner Digital Media Technologies
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:20:52AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
We tested a Sun t2000 with httpd 2.2. It did okay. Now, Sun says
there is an issue with 2.2 and portfs on Solaris 10 on the t2000.
It didn't do very well for me with Solaris 10 either.
Not real sure what this means. Anyone else
Look at Sun Alert 102485:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102485-1
The bug should have been fixed with 118833-12 several months ago. Most
early evaluaters of Niagara with Apache 2.2 ran into kernel panics
because of the bug.
The most recent kernel update patch is
With all the talk of a generic scoreboard, here's something I whipped
up that allows any other module to have some amount of memory per
worker slot. We have a different module in-house at CNN which does
something similar. This one is a little rough around the edges, but
gives an idea of what
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 10:37 -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
With all the talk of a generic scoreboard, here's something I whipped
up that allows any other module to have some amount of memory per
worker slot. We have a different module in-house at CNN which does
something similar. This one is a
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Nice stuff but I am not sure that having shared memory per slot scales
when having a lot of entries, but that makes sure that one
process/thread won't overwrite another one slot.
It scales very nicely. We run with max clients set between 16k-32k with
no issues.
On 8/30/06, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most recent kernel update patch is 118833-20 (SPARC versions, X86
should be analogous).
Yah, that bug has been fixed. (Paul reported the bug early on, I think.)
We have also heard reports that the SSL crypto engine on the T2000's
is
Brian Akins wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Nice stuff but I am not sure that having shared memory per slot scales
when having a lot of entries, but that makes sure that one
process/thread won't overwrite another one slot.
It scales very nicely. We run with max clients set between
Yes - there are issues with Apache on Solaris 10 when using SSL (nothing
to do with the T2000). We currently have two bugs outstanding :
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6375348
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6374503
In our testing,
On Wed, 2006-30-08 at 23:02 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-30-08 at 12:59 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at perchild with the aim of getting it working.
maybe you're
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-07-27 13:26:10 -0400 (Thu, 27 Jul 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-08-22 16:41:03 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained
20 matches
Mail list logo
