Torn about solving plog

2007-08-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
For the most part, we can and do tear down plog before we re-run the open_logs hook. But the stderr pipe, and especially the stderr/main server log's pipe process, really must survive the open_logs phase (and then be torn down once new logs were successfully opened). I implemented this in terms

Getting apr_proc_fork to set SELinux Context / Domain

2007-08-22 Thread JoshuaKramer
Howdy All, Is there an easy way to get the apr_proc_fork mechanism to set the SELinux context or domain of child scripts? I am using an experimental module (mod_wsgi) to run Python scripts; the Python script is run in a Python interpreter which in turn is embedded in child HTTPD processes.

Re: Getting apr_proc_fork to set SELinux Context / Domain

2007-08-22 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 08/22/2007 07:21 PM, JoshuaKramer wrote: Howdy All, Is there an easy way to get the apr_proc_fork mechanism to set the SELinux context or domain of child scripts? I am using an experimental module (mod_wsgi) to run Python scripts; the Python script is run in a Python interpreter

Re: Getting apr_proc_fork to set SELinux Context / Domain

2007-08-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 08/22/2007 07:21 PM, JoshuaKramer wrote: Howdy All, Is there an easy way to get the apr_proc_fork mechanism to set the SELinux context or domain of child scripts? I am using an experimental module (mod_wsgi) to run Python scripts; the Python script is run in a

Re: Getting apr_proc_fork to set SELinux Context / Domain

2007-08-22 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On 23/08/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 08/22/2007 07:21 PM, JoshuaKramer wrote: Howdy All, Is there an easy way to get the apr_proc_fork mechanism to set the SELinux context or domain of child scripts? I am using an experimental module

Re: auth dbd pgsql issues

2007-08-22 Thread Chris Darroch
Guenter Knauf wrote: I think you would increase chance for another vote if there would be only _one_ patch which applies cleanly against current 2.2.x head; I've started testing with them, but got stopped since one patch didnt apply of them all; therefore I only voted on the first one

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Aug 22 23:47:28 2007

2007-08-22 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2007-08-22 21:25:50 -0400 (Wed, 22 Aug 2007) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Documentation status is

[STATUS] (httpd-2.2) Wed Aug 22 23:48:11 2007

2007-08-22 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.2 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2007-08-22 20:24:29 -0400 (Wed, 22 Aug 2007) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Documentation status is

[STATUS] (httpd-trunk) Wed Aug 22 23:50:54 2007

2007-08-22 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-08-22 16:41:03 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS Documentation status is maintained