Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43711] - 100-continue response when 401 expected

2007-10-27 Thread Ruediger Pluem
Moving over to dev@ as this is a technical discussion On 10/27/2007 01:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43711. ANY REPLY MADE TO

Proxying subrequests

2007-10-27 Thread Nick Kew
Our subrequest API currently handles only local subrequests, so for example mod_include doesn't support !--#include virtual=http://example.com/example.txt--. I've worked around this in the past with some ugly hacks. Looking at the code, it's actually very simple to build in support for remote

Re: Proxying subrequests

2007-10-27 Thread Graham Leggett
Nick Kew wrote: Our subrequest API currently handles only local subrequests, so for example mod_include doesn't support !--#include virtual=http://example.com/example.txt--. I've worked around this in the past with some ugly hacks. Looking at the code, it's actually very simple to build in

Re: Proxying subrequests

2007-10-27 Thread André Malo
* Nick Kew wrote: Our subrequest API currently handles only local subrequests, so for example mod_include doesn't support !--#include virtual=http://example.com/example.txt--. I've worked around this in the past with some ugly hacks. How ugly are they? I'd rather accept them than...

Re: Proxying subrequests

2007-10-27 Thread Paul Querna
Nick Kew wrote: Our subrequest API currently handles only local subrequests, so for example mod_include doesn't support !--#include virtual=http://example.com/example.txt--. I've worked around this in the past with some ugly hacks. Looking at the code, it's actually very simple to build in