I'm looking for secure versions of ap_get_server_name and ap_get_server_port
which can be trusted to always evaluate to the correct host and port for
re-constructing the original URL the user requested. I've removed all of the
code below which seemed to rely on DNS, or info sent from the
Sorry let me clarify. I'm looking at doing external policy evaluation of the
URI like is done is most SSO products. I have to create a policy for every
URL the user may hit (with support for wildcards). I would like to minimize
the number of policies created. So while there may be 5
Great idea
Nick
Jani M. wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing with the idea of adding support for the proxy module
to add stickysession cookies on behalf of the backend servers. I have
one case on my hands right now where this would be needed, and I can
think of this being of use for others too.
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
You can already do this with mod_headers. Just add
Header add Set-Cookie MYCOOKIE=SOMEVALUE.%{BALANCER_WORKER_ROUTE}e;
path=/; env=BALANCER_ROUTE_CHANGED
Ah. Don't know why, but for some reason I didn't even think of using
mod_headers for this. Now that you mentioned
On Mar 6, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Jani M. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
You can already do this with mod_headers. Just add
Header add Set-Cookie MYCOOKIE=SOMEVALUE.%
{BALANCER_WORKER_ROUTE}e; path=/; env=BALANCER_ROUTE_CHANGED
Ah. Don't know why, but for some reason I didn't even think of using
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The advantage of mod_headers is more flexibility that what could
be comfortably added to the proxy module itself as well...
This comes up maybe once or twice a year... I think I'll add
it to my standard Apache 2.2
On Mar 6, 2008, at 3:10 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The advantage of mod_headers is more flexibility that what could
be comfortably added to the proxy module itself as well...
This comes up maybe once or twice a year... I
On Mar 6, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Mar 6, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Jani M. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
You can already do this with mod_headers. Just add
Header add Set-Cookie MYCOOKIE=SOMEVALUE.%
{BALANCER_WORKER_ROUTE}e; path=/; env=BALANCER_ROUTE_CHANGED
Ah. Don't know
Hi --
This looks great! Some semi-random thoughts, dealing just with
the main header file.
I was a little puzzled by the name socache because I assumed
so meant shared object, like mod_so, until I read the code comments.
I wondered if it was true that people would only use this kind of
On 06/03/2008, Chris Darroch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was a little puzzled by the name socache because I assumed
so meant shared object, like mod_so, until I read the code comments.
I wondered if it was true that people would only use this kind of
interface to store small objects -- I
10 matches
Mail list logo
