+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Hi,
My name is Michael Simonetto, I'm a student in Brussels finishing my thesis
about communication in open source projects.
I need some interviews to illustrate and complete my work and have thought
the mailing list would be a convenient way to find some developers kind
enough to help me!
If you
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Nevertheless I think that the precleanup code in apr trunk and the
changes to the reslist
in apr-util trunk are not backportable just because of the example
above: Code may break
if you change an apr / apr-util 1.3 release under the hood. This should
not happen.
I
On Aug 3, 2008, at 4:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
So does this mean that trunk is now based on a broken or
incompatible version of apr? Do we need to now break off
trunk to 2.4 and baseline APR 1.3 to allow trunk to now work
with an incompatible APR rev?
There's
On Aug 3, 2008, at 2:44 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Nevertheless I think that the precleanup code in apr trunk and the
changes to the reslist
in apr-util trunk are not backportable just because of the example
above: Code may break
if you change an apr / apr-util 1.3 release under the hood.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Mon Aug 4 05:53:50 2008
@@ -1380,7 +1380,6 @@
proxy_worker *worker = (proxy_worker *)theworker;
if (worker-cp-res) {
worker-cp-pool = NULL;
-
On 08/04/2008 03:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Mon Aug 4 06:49:07 2008
New Revision: 682389
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682389view=rev
Log:
*) mod_cgid: Pass along empty command line arguments from an ISINDEX
query that has consecutive '+' characters
On Aug 4, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/04/2008 03:50 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Mon Aug 4
05:53:50 2008
@@ -1380,7 +1380,6 @@
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/04/2008 03:50 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Mon Aug 4 05:53:50
2008
@@ -1380,7 +1380,6 @@
proxy_worker *worker = (proxy_worker
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 4, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/04/2008 03:50 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Mon Aug 4 05:53:50
2008
@@ -1380,7
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:27:58PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to unit test my module (catacomb.tigris.org) using Python. My
idea is to load the module with ctypes (a python module that allows to
load functions from shared libraries into python) and test it in this
environment.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'll add though, that if you can do it from scratch, the obvious way in
this day and age is to start with the WIX project (sourceforge, MS created)
which is an XML format - very transparent, and can be built by any of the
contributors using free tools.
That's
Mladen Turk wrote:
If the under the hood apr_reslist behavior is of such
concern we can create apr_reslist_create_ex with some
param that will allow to specify the pool cleanup ordering
keeping everyone happy concerning backporting and still
allowing all the goodies.
In APR version 1.4.0 of
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
If the under the hood apr_reslist behavior is of such
concern we can create apr_reslist_create_ex with some
param that will allow to specify the pool cleanup ordering
keeping everyone happy concerning backporting and still
allowing all the
Hi,
Right now any event happening in mpm child process
is per request based. As an example I'll give
mod_proxy and its connection pool. The connection_pool
maintenance happens only when a request comes in which
is fine for a frequently accessed server. If there
is no request for a long time the
On 8/4/08 12:59 PM, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mod_balancer decaying (averaging) the transferred statistics,
so that node-up/recovery doesn't consume all the load.
mod_proxy_ajp sending ping/pong at regular intervals (detecting
node failure before
Mladen Turk wrote:
Comments, other ideas?
I would prefer to not add a separate 'dedicated' thread, but just 'use'
a worker thread, when it is about to idle instead. When you are about
to go into the idle wait, check if there are any timed tasks that need
to execute soon, and run that
On Aug 4, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Comments, other ideas?
I would prefer to not add a separate 'dedicated' thread, but just
'use' a worker thread, when it is about to idle instead. When you
are about to go into the idle wait, check if there are any timed
On Aug 4, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Akins, Brian wrote:
On 8/4/08 12:59 PM, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mod_balancer decaying (averaging) the transferred statistics,
so that node-up/recovery doesn't consume all the load.
mod_proxy_ajp sending ping/pong at regular intervals
Thanks for keeping track of this. Wouldn't it make sense to keep the
code identical in mod_cgi and mod_cgid?
Jim got this in r682475 before I could ACK. I updated the backport proposal.
Thanks for the review.
--
Eric Covener
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo