We have a setup that uses an in-house module which works not entirely
unlike mod_vhost_alias, in that it has a single virtual host configured,
and then determines stuff like domain name, docroot, etc, from the request.
We'd love to be able to use SSL in this setup, but as far as I can see,
Hi,
I have developed an tested a mod_include.c improvement (httpd 2.2.15).
The module can now handle the include uvirtual command, where uvirtual
means unbuffered.
If command is include virtual and 200 OK there is a call to ap_rflush(r).
I had this idea because is useful to send chunk (also
mod_lua has 8 separate directives for adding hooks using external files
with Lua code (LuaHookX) and 8 more for adding the same hooks using
inline Lua code (LuaHookX). Most of the code to implement these
is common.
I think it'd be easier to understand - and document - the module if we
Spam detection software, running on the system heartofgold.mirimar.net, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for
Hi, all.
I found this document today stating the following:
Each developer is responsible for notifying the mailing list and
adding an action item to STATUS when they have an idea for a new feature
or major change to propose for the product.
Since I am not a committer, how would I go about
On 5/10/2010 1:28 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all.
I found this document today stating the following:
Each developer is responsible for notifying the mailing list and
adding an action item to STATUS when they have an idea for a new feature
or major change to propose for the product.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
mod_lua has 8 separate directives for adding hooks using external files
with Lua code (LuaHookX) and 8 more for adding the same hooks using
inline Lua code (LuaHookX). Most of the code to implement these
is common.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
mod_lua has 8 separate directives for adding hooks using external files
with Lua code (LuaHookX) and 8 more for adding the same hooks using
+1
~Jorge
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org
wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
mod_lua has 8 separate directives for adding hooks using
On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
...
to
LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
LuaHook CheckUserID /path/to/script.lua funcname
Any reason not to name the func before the script, especially since path names
On 5/4/2010 2:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Here's a backport vote to 2.2 for your consideration;
It is far too painful to adopt the new Mutex directive for modules targeting
httpd 2.2 and future 2.3. The solution, I believe, is to provide the mutex
directive for all developers to use,
+1 from me tests good (thx for the reminder ping!)
On May 10, 2010, at 4:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 5/4/2010 2:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Here's a backport vote to 2.2 for your consideration;
It is far too painful to adopt the new Mutex directive for modules targeting
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:03 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
...
to
LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
LuaHook CheckUserID /path/to/script.lua funcname
13 matches
Mail list logo
