On 01/07/2011 08:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/7/2011 12:49 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
If caution is to be exercised for other reasons, such as losing data in the
event of a
crash, that's a separate issue, and should be handled separately.
It should be used with caution. Instead
On 07 Jan 2011, at 9:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
If caution is to be exercised for other reasons, such as losing
data in the event of a
crash, that's a separate issue, and should be handled separately.
It should be used with caution. Instead of arguing, replace the
caution.
Or I'm
On Saturday 08 January 2011, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Sat Jan 8 14:29:12 2011
New Revision: 1056713
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1056713view=rev
Log:
Fix a bug in authz logic merging which caused
section-op == AUTHZ_LOGIC_AND
auth_result ==
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:48 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 12/30/2010 8:09 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
I mean take the CMS I just wrote with mod_perl. It's 2K LOC, uses a custom
map_to_storage handler, and defers a good chunk of its (sub)requests to httpd
for things like
Hi,
there are some serious problems with how If ... is implemented right
now:
1) It is hooked into ap_file_walk() which is only called in the
map_to_storage hook. This means that it is not executed for non-file
requests like ProxyPass'ed requests. This reduces its usefulness a
great deal.
- Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Hi,
there are some serious problems with how If ... is implemented right
now:
1) It is hooked into ap_file_walk() which is only called in the
map_to_storage hook. This means that it is not executed for non-file
requests like ProxyPass'ed
On 1/8/2011 4:15 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
How about
noteThis directive should be used with caution as a crash might cause loss
of logging data./note
or something similar. Doc's wordsmithes please chime in :-).
Yup, that's the gist of it. Thanks for wordsmithing, and thanks Graham
for
On 1/8/2011 5:53 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
I've got a better idea. Why not collaborate with the other people in this
project instead
of attempting to bully them with the threat of yet-another-veto?
Before you try to mis-characterize me as a bully or as veto-happy, please
compare
the number
On 1/8/2011 8:50 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Saturday 08 January 2011, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Sat Jan 8 14:29:12 2011
New Revision: 1056713
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1056713view=rev
Log:
Fix a bug in authz logic merging which caused
section-op ==
